Blackwater group is more nepotism from Repubs...

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by jterrell, Sep 18, 2007.

  1. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received

    Blackwater USA is a private military company and security firm founded in 1997 by Erik Prince and Al Clark. It is based in the U.S. state of North Carolina where it operates a tactical training facility which it claims is the world's largest. The company trains more than 40,000 people a year, from all the military services and a variety of other agencies. The company markets itself as being "The most comprehensive professional military, law enforcement, security, peacekeeping, and stability operations company in the world". At least 90% of its revenue comes from government contracts, two-thirds of which are no-bid contracts.[1]

    Corporate structure

    Blackwater USA consists of nine companies:

    Blackwater Training Center

    Blackwater Training Center offers tactics and weapons training to military, government, and law enforcement agencies. See facilities below. Blackwater Training Center also offers several open-enrollment courses periodically throughout the year, from hand to hand combat (executive course) to precision rifle marksmanship.

    Blackwater Target Systems

    This division provides and maintains target range steel targets and a "shoothouse" system.[2]

    Blackwater Security Consulting (Moyock, North Carolina)
    Blackwater MD 530F in Iraq
    Blackwater MD 530F in Iraq

    Blackwater Security Consulting (BSC) was formed in 2002. BSC is one of 180 private security firms employed during the Iraq War to guard officials and installations, train Iraq's new Army and Police, and provide other support for Coalition Forces.[3]

    Blackwater Security Consulting is very well equipped and known to use:

    * MD-530F "Little Bird" helicopters, organized into Quick Response Force (QRF) teams.
    * Sikorsky S-92 helicopters are known to be used based on Blackwater USA's careers page.
    * AB 412 utility helicopters in use in Iraq.
    * BAE RG-31 Mamba armored vehicles, purchased from the British Army are known to be used to transport personnel along Route Irish[4]
    * Force Protection Industries Cougar H[5]
    * Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano - Blackwater has purchased one of these aircraft for pilot training in the US, with possible plans for more in the Counter Insurgency (COIN) role later.[6][7]
    * Blackwater has won a S-70A modification/upgrade program for the UAE Special Operations Command which include Mounts for Machine Guns, Heads Up Display, Secure Communications and FLIR systems EO-IR sensor with Vectr mission system.

    Blackwater K-9

    Training canines to work in patrol capacities as war dogs, explosives and drug detection, and various other roles for military and law enforcement duties.

    Blackwater Airships, LLC

    Blackwater Airships LLC was established in January 2006 to build a remotely piloted airship vehicle (RPAV).
    Blackwater Armored Vehicle

    Blackwater recently introduced its own armored personnel carrier, the Grizzly APC.[8]

    Blackwater Maritime

    Blackwater Maritime Security Services offers tactical training for maritime force protection units. In the past it has trained Greek security forces for the 2004 Olympics, Azerbaijan Naval Sea Commandos, and Afghanistan’s Ministry of Interior.[9]

    Raven Development Group

    In 1997, the Raven Development Group was established to design and build Blackwater USA's training facility in North Carolina.

    Aviation Worldwide Services (Presidential Airways and STI Aviation)

    Aircraft maintenance and tactical transportation. Presidential Airways claims to hold a Secret Facility Clearance from the U.S. Department of Defense.[10]

    Greystone Limited

    A private security service, Greystone is registered in Barbados, and employs third country nationals for offshore security work.


    Blackwater's president, Gary Jackson, and other business unit leaders are former Navy SEALs. Blackwater was founded and is owned by Erik Prince, who is also a former Navy SEAL.[11]

    Prince and Jackson are also major contributors to the Republican party. In addition, Prince was an intern in George H.W. Bush's White House and campaigned for Pat Buchanan in 1992.[12]

    Cofer Black, the company's current vice chairman, was the Bush adminstration's top counterterrorism official when 9/11 occurred. In 2002, he famously stated: "There was before 9/11 and after 9/11. After 9/11, the gloves come off." But Black is not alone, Blackwater has become home to a significant number of former senior CIA and Pentagon officials. Robert Richer became the firm's Vice President of Intelligence immediately after he resigned his position as Associate Deputy Director of Operations in fall 2005. He is formerly the head of the CIA's Near East Division.[13]

    In October 2006, Kenneth Starr, independent counsel in the impeachment case of Bill Clinton in 1999, represented Blackwater in front of the US Supreme Court in a case related to the March 2004 killing of four Blackwater employees in Fallujah, Iraq.[14] In response to that event, Blackwater also hired the Republican lobbying and PR firm, the Alexander Strategy Group.[15]


    The facility, located in North Carolina, is composed of several ranges, indoor, outdoor, urban reproductions and has over 7,000 acres (28 km²) of land spanning Camden and Currituck counties.

    It is one of the largest firearms training facilities in the world. Company literature claims that the company runs "the largest privately owned firearms training facility in the world."

    In November 2006 Blackwater USA announced it recently acquired an 80-acre (30 ha) facility 150 miles (240 km) west of Chicago, in Mount Carroll, Illinois to be called Blackwater North. That facility is now operational.

    Blackwater is also trying[16] to open a facility in California for military training,[17] in Potrero, San Diego County.[18][19]


    Blackwater USA was formed in 1997 to provide training support to military and law enforcement organizations. In 2002 Blackwater Security Consulting (BSC) was formed. It was one of several private security firms employed following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. BSC is one of over 60 private security firms employed during the Iraq War to guard officials and installations, train Iraq's new army and police, and provide other support for occupation forces.[20] Blackwater was also hired during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina by the Department of Homeland Security, as well as by private clients, including communications, petrochemical and insurance companies.[21] In each case, Blackwater received a non-bid contract. Overall, the company has received over 500 million dollars in government contracts.[22]

    Iraq involvement

    In 2003, Blackwater landed its first truly high-profile contract: guarding Ambassador L. Paul Bremer in Iraq, at the cost of $21 million in 11 months. Since June 2004, Blackwater has been paid more than $320 million out of a $1 billion, five-year State Department budget for the Worldwide Personal Protective Service, which protects U.S. officials and some foreign officials in conflict zones.[23] In 2006, Blackwater won the remunerative contract to protect the U.S. embassy in Iraq, which is the largest American embassy in the world. It is estimated by the Pentagon and company representatives that there are 20,000 to 30,000 armed security contractors working in Iraq, and some estimates are as much as 100,000, though no official figures exist.[24][25] Of the State Department's dependence on private contractors like Blackwater for security purposes, U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, told the U.S. Senate: "There is simply no way at all that the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security could ever have enough full-time personnel to staff the security function in Iraq. There is no alternative except through contracts."[26]

    For work in Iraq, Blackwater has drawn contractors from their international pool of professionals, a database containing "21,000 former Special Forces troops, soldiers, and retired law enforcement agents," overall.[27] For instance, Gary Jackson, the firm's president, has confirmed that Bosnians, Filipinos, and Chileans (many trained under Augusto Pinochet), "have been hired for tasks ranging from airport security to protecting Paul Bremer, the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority."[28]

    Fallujah mission

    Main article: 31 March 2004 Fallujah ambush

    On March 31, 2004, Iraqi insurgents in Fallujah attacked a convoy containing four American private military contractors from Blackwater USA who were conducting delivery for food caterers ESS.[29] The four armed contractors Scott Helvenston, Jerko Zovko, Wesley Batalona and Michael Teague, were attacked and killed with grenades and small arms fire. Their bodies were hung over a bridge crossing the Euphrates.[30]

    Photos of the event were released to news agencies worldwide, causing a great deal of indignation and moral outrage in the United States. The event led to a failed U.S. operation to occupy the city in the First Battle of Fallujah, and the later successful attempt seven months later in the Second Battle of Fallujah.

    Later incidents

    In April 2004, a few days after the Fallujah bridge hanging, a small team of Blackwater employees, along with soldiers of the Spanish Army, held off over four hundred insurgents outside the Coalition Provisional Authority Headquarters in Al Najaf, Iraq, waiting over three hours for U.S. troops to arrive. The Headquarters was surrounded and it was the last friendly area in the city. Supplies were running low. During this fight, a small but highly trained volunteer group of Blackwater contractors flew on a rescue mission to the Coalition Provisional Authority Headquarters to maintain its control, and bring an injured U.S. Marine back to safety outside of the city.[31] [32][33]

    In April 2005 six Blackwater independent contractors were killed in Iraq when their Mi-8 helicopter was shot down. Also killed were three Bulgarian crewmembers and two Fijian gunners. Initial reports indicate the helicopter was shot down by rocket propelled grenades. The six Americans killed have been identified as:[34]

    * Robert Jason Gore, of Nevada, Iowa
    * Luke Adam Petrik of Conneaut, Ohio
    * Jason Obert of Fountain, Colorado
    * Steve McGovern of Lexington, Kentucky
    * Erick Smith of Waukesha, Wisconsin
    * David Patterson of Havelock, North Carolina

    The three Bulgarians have been identified as:

    * Lyubomir Kostov [35]
    * Georgi Naidenov [36]
    * Stoyan Anchev [36]

    On January 23, 2007, five Blackwater contractors were killed in Iraq when their Hughes H-6 helicopter was shot down. The incident happened in Baghdad, Haifa Street. The crash site was secured by a Personal Security Detail Platoon, callsign "Jester" from 1/26 Infantry, 1st Infantry Division. Three Iraqi insurgent groups claimed responsibility for shooting down the helicopter, however, this has not been confirmed by the US.[37] A US defense official has confirmed that four of the five killed were shot execution style in the back of the head, but did not know whether the four were still alive when they were shot.[38] Robert Young Pelton broke the full details of the crash on his site. Pelton also met and flew with the Little Bird pilots.[39]

    On August 12, 2007, an MSNBC report noted the largely unaccountable and unsupervised nature of security contractor activities, and the high number of casual or indiscriminate civilian killings attributed to them. According to the State Department, on December 24, 2006, a civilian U.S. contractor, allegedly a Blackwater employee, shot and killed an Iraqi security officer.[40] In late May 2007, Blackwater contractors, "opened fire on the streets of Baghdad twice in two days... and one of the incidents provoked a standoff between the security contractors and Iraqi forces, U.S. and Iraqi officials said."[41] And on May 30, 2007, Blackwater employees shot an Iraqi civilian deemed to have been "driving too close" to a convoy of Blackwater armored vehicles.[42][43] Other private security contractors, such as Aegis Defence Services have also been accused of similar actions.[44] However, "Doug Brooks, the president of the International Peace Operations Association, a trade group representing Blackwater and other military contractors, said that in his view, military law would not apply to Blackwater contractors working for the State Department."[45]

    Revocation of Iraq license

    On September 17, 2007, Blackwater's license to operate in Iraq was revoked following an incident that occurred the previous day. A convoy of US State Department vehicles guarded by Blackwater was attacked in the al-Yarmukh neighborhood of western Baghdad. According to the incident report, the attack occured at 12:08pm, when "the motorcade was engaged with small arms fire from several locations". One vehicle was disabled in the attack, and had to be towed away. The report goes on to state that "The team returned fire to several identified targets" before leaving the area, and that a second convoy en-route to help was "blocked/surrounded by several Iraqi police and Iraqi national guard vehicles and armed personnel".[46] A Blackwater helicopter was also present, and according to a Washington Post employee, it fired several times from the air, although Blackwater has denied this.[47] Sources have also stated that the fighting began after an explosion, possibly a mortar round, went off close to the convoy, although this is not reflected in the incident report, which can be found here.[48] Iraqi Brigadier-General Abdul-Karim Khalaf confirmed that a mortar had landed close to the convoy and said the US firm had 'opened fire randomly at citizens'. Nine civilians were killed including one Iraqi policeman. No State Department officials were wounded or killed. [49] The State Department had not been notified of the Iraqi government's decision, and declined to speculate how it might affect State Department activities. Many doubt that the Iraqi government will have the resolve to revoke Blackwater's license over the long term due to Blackwater's political influence and other factors. Retired Marine Lt. Col. Bill Cowan, an independent military analyst and co-chairman of security consulting firm WVC3 Group, was quoted on September 17, 2007, by the Associated Press as saying: "You can bet the U.S. embassy is doing backflips right now pressuring the Iraqis not to revoke their license." [50]

    Interior Ministry spokesman Brig. Gen. Abdul Kareem Khalaf said "the investigation is ongoing, and all those responsible for Sunday's killing will be referred to Iraqi justice." Iraqi authorities have issued previous complaints about shootings by private military contractors, but Iraqi courts do not have the authority to bring contractors to trial without the consent of their home country, according to a report from the Congressional Research Service.[51].

    The Private Security Company Association of Iraq, in a document last updated on July 3, 2007, lists Blackwater as having applied for, though not yet as having received, the license in question.[52] Blackwater's operations on behalf of the US Department of State and the CIA might be unaffected by this claimed license revocation.[53] Also, it is not clear whether the license revocation is permanent.[54] Nonetheless, the banning was described by P.W. Singer, an expert on the private military industry, as "inevitable," given the US governments' reliance on and lack of oversight of the private military industry in Iraq.[55]

    Blackwater has denied any wrongdoing in the incident.[56] The U.S. State Department said it plans to investigate what it calls a "terrible incident."[51] Henry Waxman, the chair of the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, also said his committee would hold hearings "to understand what has happened and the extent of the damage to U.S. security interests."[56]


    Blackwater is currently being sued by the families of the four contractors killed in Fallujah in March, 2004. The families allege that they are not suing for financial damages, but rather for the details of their sons' and husbands' deaths. They claim that Blackwater has refused to supply these details, and that in its "zeal to exploit this unexpected market for private security men, showed a callous disregard for the safety of its employees."[57] Four family members testified in front of the House Government Reform Committee on February 7, 2007. They asked that Blackwater be held accountable for future negligence of employees' lives, and that Federal legislation be drawn up to govern contracts between the Department of Defense and the defense contractor.[58] Blackwater has counter-sued the lawyer representing the empty estates of the deceased for $10 million on the grounds that the lawsuit was contractually prohibited from ever being filed.[59]

    On April 19, 2006, The Nation magazine published an article titled, "Blood Is Thicker Than Blackwater," concerning the lawsuit against Blackwater brought by some of the families of the four deceased employees.[60] The article discussed the removal of the word "armoured" from already-signed contracts, and other allegations of wrongdoing.

    According to an Army report, in November 2004, a Blackwater plane, "in violation of numerous government regulations and contract requirements," crashed into a mountainside, killing all six aboard.[61] The families of the three soldiers killed -- Lt. Col. Michael McMahon, Chief Warrant Officer Travis Grogan and Spec. Harley Miller -- filed a wrongful death suit against Blackwater, alleging negligence. However, Presidential Airways, a division of Blackwater, questioned the hastiness of the Army's report, stating that it "contains numerous errors, misstatements, and unfounded assumptions."[62]

    Post-Katrina Involvement

    Blackwater USA was employed to assist the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts on the Gulf Coast. According to a company press release, it provided airlift, security, and logistics and transportation services, as well as humanitarian support. Unofficial reports claim that the company also acted as law enforcement in the disaster stricken areas, such as securing neighborhoods and "confronting criminals".[63]

    Blackwater moved about 200 personnel into the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, most of whom (164 employees) were working under a contract with the Department of Homeland Security to protect government facilities[64], but the company held contracts with private clients as well.

    Overall, Blackwater had a "visible, and financially lucrative, presence in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as the use of the company contractors cost U.S. taxpayers $240,000 a day."[65] There has been much dispute surrounding governmental contracts in post-Katrina New Orleans, especially no-bid contracts such as the one Blackwater was awarded. Blackwater's heavily-armored presence in the city was also the subject of much confusion and criticism.[66][67]

    Other employments

    Blackwater USA is one of five companies picked by the Department of Defense Counter-Narcoterrorism Technology Program Office in a a five-year contract for equipment, material and services in support of counter-narcoterrorism activities. The contract is worth up to $15 billion. The other companies picked are Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Arinc Inc.[68]

    Blackwater USA has also been contracted by various foreign governments. In 2005, it worked to train the Naval Sea Commando regiment of Azerbaijan, enhancing their interdiction capabilities on the Caspian Sea.[69]

    Controversy and criticism

    In March 2006, Cofer Black, vice chairman of Blackwater USA, allegedly suggested at an international conference in Amman, Jordan, that the company is ready to move towards providing security professionals up to brigade size for humanitarian efforts and low intensity conflicts. Mr. Black denies the allegation. Critics have suggested this may be going too far in putting political decisions in the hands of privately owned corporations.[70] The company denies this was ever said.[71]

    Critics claim that Blackwater's private military company self-description is a euphemism for mercenary activities.[10]

    Perhaps the most thorough book about Blackwater was published in 2006 by investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill, titled Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.

    Author Chris Hedges wrote about the establishment of mercenary armies as a threat to democracy in his June 3, 2007 article for the Philadelphia Inquirer, "What if our mercenaries turn on us?" [72] Reprinted in the New York Times, Particularly of note in the article is the question being raised of the wisdom of allowing private enterprises to become involved in combat operations, and its potential advantages and disadvantages.


    1. ^ hamptonroads Blackwater: On the Front Lines by Bill Sizemore and Joanne Kimberline, The Virginian-Pilot, July 25, 2006
    2. ^
    3. ^ Role of security companies likely to become more visible
    4. ^
    5. ^
    6. ^
    7. ^
    8. ^ Blackwater Product Page
    9. ^
    10. ^ a b
    11. ^
    12. ^
    13. ^ Ken Silverstein, "Revolving Door to Blackwater Causes Alarm at CIA," Harper's Magazine, September 12, 2006.
    14. ^ Jeremy Scahill and Garrett Ordower, "From Whitewater to Blackwater" The Nation, October 26, 2006.
    15. ^ Blood Is Thicker Than
    16. ^
    17. ^
    18. ^
    19. ^
    20. ^ Role of security companies likely to become more visible
    21. ^ Private Security Company Creates Stir in New Orleans-The Virginian-Pilot
    22. ^ US-IRAQ: Blackwater Blues for Dead Contractors' Families, by Bill Berkowitz, IPS, June 29, 2007.
    23. ^,9171,1599682,00.html "Victims of an Outsourced War"
    24. ^ U.S. Security Contractors Open Fire in]
    25. ^,9171,1599682,00.html
    26. ^,8599,1662586,00.html
    27. ^
    28. ^,,1162441,00.html
    29. ^ left on without maps or support units. The High Risk Contracting Business
    30. ^ 'Residents hang slain Americans' bodies from bridge'—
    31. ^ 'Private Guards Repel Attack on U.S. Headquarters
    32. ^ 'Contractors in combat: Firefight from a rooftop in Iraq
    33. ^
    34. ^
    35. ^,2933,154280,00.html
    36. ^ a b
    37. ^ U.S. crew of downed helicopter shot at close range—
    38. ^ 4 Americans in Iraq Crash Shot in Head—
    39. ^ Pelton, Robert Young: "Licensed to Kill, Hired Guns in the War on Terror," Crown, August 29, 2006
    40. ^ "Iraq killing tracked to contractor could test laws"
    41. ^
    42. ^ [1]
    43. ^
    44. ^ [2]
    45. ^
    46. ^,8599,1662586,00.html
    47. ^
    48. ^,8599,1662586,00.html
    49. ^
    50. ^;_ylt=Aql4IIFirYmFfQkXWBWHmZWs0NUE
    51. ^ a b Blackwater security firm banned from Iraq
    52. ^ Private Security Company Association of Iraq, list retrieved, September 17, 2007.
    53. ^ Blackwater: Banned in Iraq? (Updated), Wired Blog, Sharon Weinberger.
    54. ^ Will Iraq Kick Out Blackwater? by Adam Zagorin & Brian Bennett, TIME, September 17, 2007: "A spokesman for Iraq's Interior Ministry has told reporters it has cancelled Blackwater's license and will launch an investigation into whether excessive force was used in the incident. But a senior Iraqi official contacted by TIME said that prime minister Maliki is expected to discuss the episode at a cabinet session scheduled for Tuesday and that, as far as the license being permanently revoked, "it's not a done deal yet.""
    55. ^ Blackwater Ban "Inevitable" by Noah Shachtman, Wired Blog, September 17, 2007.
    56. ^ a b Blackwater Denies Any Wrongdoing in Shooting Incident (Update1) by Ken Fireman and Robin Stringer, Bloomberg, September 17, 2007.
    57. ^,9171,1599682,00.html
    58. ^,9171,1599682–1,00.html
    59. ^
    60. ^
    61. ^
    62. ^
    63. ^ Overkill: Feared Blackwater Mercenaries Deploy in New Orleans
    64. ^
    65. ^
    66. ^
    67. ^
    68. ^
    69. ^
    70. ^ Blackwater USA says it can supply forces for conflicts
    71. ^ Inside America's Private Army (continued)
    72. ^ What if our mercenaries turn on us? by Chris Hedges for the New York Times,, June 3, 2007.
  2. burmafrd

    burmafrd Benched

    43,820 Messages
    3,377 Likes Received
    repubs had blackwater; dems had white water. Both sides need to stay out of the water.
  3. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received

    that is pretty good:)


    I am definitely worried about these guys.
    Especially as they could and have been hired by foreign governments.
  4. sacase

    sacase Well-Known Member

    4,491 Messages
    203 Likes Received
    You do know why it is located in NC right? Maybe its because of those special ops guys from Ft. Bragg. These guys are very patriotic and will always put american interests first. There are laws that cover mercenary comanies like this. Basically they can't do anything that is against US interest.
  5. burmafrd

    burmafrd Benched

    43,820 Messages
    3,377 Likes Received
    If some gomers here think that a lot of former Clinton admin types are not doing the same thing then they really are dumb.
  6. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received
    Did you read the Wikipedia?

    This company has created branches and arms which could/would circumvent those rules.

    Anytime you corporatize the military you are setting yourself up for failure.
  7. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received
    Now you have lost me.

    Clinton's intern was a chub with admiration skills not a Navy Seal who now is a chairman for the world's largest mercenary company.

    These guys are simply trying to capitalize on their military training and background which is one hand commendable and on the other outright scary. Mercenaries generally go to the highest bidder.
  8. sacase

    sacase Well-Known Member

    4,491 Messages
    203 Likes Received

    First Blackwater is a US Company. It is subject to US LAW. They can create as many branches as they like it doesn't change the fact that they are a US company and are subject to US laws.

    Second, Blackwater is made of some of the most patriotic men this country has, most of these men are Special Forces types, men from the Rangers, Special Forces, Navy Seals, Pararescue and the 160th SOAR. The belive in this country and what it stands for. While you might find a couple who would do anything for any amount of money, there are far to many men in Blackwater with good morals and values who won't go against this country. While the purpose is to make money, they are not going to go against US policy, especially since they make a ton from the US government contracts.
  9. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received
    Blackwater has hired former guerrillas from Chile and Honduras and many other countries in bulk. In fact many nations that have pulled out of Iraq have seen those same fighting men go back in as members of Blackwater.

    When I asked if you read the wiki it was because it detailed them creating NON-US corporations which would be able to work around any regulations we place on them.

    And when the US does stop driving their enormous growth what happens? When there isn't an Iraq war to fight? I seriously doubt the next president sends them to a post-Katrina type disaster to make 240k per DAY.

    At some point they will run themselves as a business. Mercenaries may start out with patriotism and whatnot but this is a business that hires non-Americans and wants to insure a healthy bottom-line.
  10. sacase

    sacase Well-Known Member

    4,491 Messages
    203 Likes Received
    The parent company is still blackwater. Yes they created a subsidiary registered in Barbados to hire foreigners for jobs outside of the US, but they are not going against US policy. The minute they go against US policy they will be smacked down.

    If you haven't looked there is always a war going on somewhere. We always have an interest in those. As long as blackwater accepts contracts that do not go against US poicy nothing is going to change. If they decide to go against US policy then they will be hit hard. You have to remember a bulkl of the men that work for the company are EXTREAMLY patriotic Americans. They won't go against US policy.
  11. burmafrd

    burmafrd Benched

    43,820 Messages
    3,377 Likes Received
    jterrel, you really need to stop using wikipedia to try and win arguements. that is a good place for general info but it is totally discredited as a source for anything serious. Anyone can log in there and change things and it has happened.
  12. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received
    I am not using wiki anything to win arguments. I am posting general information.
    Are you disputing this wikipedia?
    If so please do point out the error. If not do you really have a point at all?

    The shell company does have its own website...
  13. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received
    Sacase, actually they are going against American policy.
    They are just doing so in an acceptable way at this time.

    The reason they registered the corporation in Barbados was to avoid US policy. We are using them as a dirty tricks unit quite honestly but again thats while the well stays wet.

    I do agree many of their rank and file membership are hugely patriotic.

    Ultimately though they are a business. They report to a boss not to a commanding officer that reports to the commander in chief.


    sourcewatch has alot of info on them.
  14. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    84,316 Messages
    7,233 Likes Received
    There job is to provide protection and that is what they have been doing. In this lastest incident the convoy came under fire and of course they returned fire in protection of those who they were to protect. As far as I know they are not running raids or so called military missions.
  15. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    21,506 Messages
    2,366 Likes Received
    They perform in many capacities in many places.
    They have the most elite mercenary units in the world.

    They offer protection detail because thats what pays the best but they hire a lot of our countries best snipers as well. They have trained military forces setting up camps for foreign countries that mirror our navy seals programs.

    If we wanted someone assassinated right now I suspect they'd get the contract as opposed to the CIA.

    Originally concentrating on providing gun and firearms training for US government agencies, after the attacks of 11 September 2001, the company evolved and now defines itself as "not simply a 'private security company'".

    "We are a professional military, law enforcement, security, peacekeeping, and stability operations firm who provides turnkey solutions," its website reads.

    The company mission statement explains it can help draw up "national and global security plans" and "train, equip and deploy public safety and military professionals".

    But again I go back the business aspect because they have evolved into training for high school shooter situations and for post-katrina contracts.

    They do very much make money.

    They hire many of our best soldiers out from under the military who could never compete with those salaries.
  16. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    84,316 Messages
    7,233 Likes Received
    I understand that I was referring to what they are doing in Iraq. I knew overall they are a paid militia or Para military for the most part. I know back in the 70's Ross Perrot hired a group similar to Blackwater to get his people out of Iran when they were taken hostage something that our own Military was unable to do during the embassy takeover. These guys were former Marine Corp and very well trained and are not under the same restriction that the military faces at times.
  17. CowboyJeff

    CowboyJeff New Member

    1,905 Messages
    0 Likes Received


    It's the same with both parties. Go Independents!!!!!!
  18. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    84,316 Messages
    7,233 Likes Received
    What makes you think an independent is clean and free from the dirty world of politics and campaign contributions from special interest?
  19. Aikbach

    Aikbach Well-Known Member

    9,745 Messages
    42 Likes Received
    Exactly, and what precisely constitutes the moniker special interests? Often it is just another term for partisan political mudslinging.

    A lobby that didn't support some candidate or an expedient scapegoat for an issue.

    We all have interests, sometimes we are represented by Corporate America and sometimes we aren't, the term itself is a farce because typically it is used to create boogeymen and witch hunts.
  20. CowboyJeff

    CowboyJeff New Member

    1,905 Messages
    0 Likes Received

    Nobody is free from special interests. Technically, if you and your family go visit your local congressman (or congresswoman) and try and pursuade him/her to vote a certain way on an issue, then you are considered an unregistered special interest group.

    The current problem with the Republicans and Democrats is that both parties have been entrenched in power for so many years, there's years and years of special interest conspiracies with each party to the point both parties view their donations as yearly entitlements.

Share This Page