Browns looking to trade DTs

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by supercowboy8, Aug 27, 2013.

  1. Idgit

    Idgit Ice up, son. Ice up! Staff Member

    40,303 Messages
    18,613 Likes Received
  2. CowboysToTheBone

    CowboysToTheBone Member

    32 Messages
    12 Likes Received
    I would trade Tanner in a heartbeat. He played hard this preseason, but I think he's Hambrick 2.0
    iowast8rs likes this.
  3. Idgit

    Idgit Ice up, son. Ice up! Staff Member

    40,303 Messages
    18,613 Likes Received
    I'd trade Tanner and Randle, both, under the right conditions. Not particularly interested in DL, though, and we'd have to get real value.
  4. Floaty

    Floaty The Labeled One

    3,840 Messages
    2,007 Likes Received
    If the Browns are willing to let Phil Taylor go.....You take him in a heartbeat...and run like you stole it:D
  5. Ultimategamer5567

    Ultimategamer5567 Member

    824 Messages
    14 Likes Received
    Hell yeeesss.
  6. FiveRings

    FiveRings Well-Known Member

    1,767 Messages
    234 Likes Received
    There's been the fridge, sure, even the freezer, but now, we have the KITCHEN
    Idgit likes this.
  7. RS12

    RS12 Well-Known Member

    19,265 Messages
    5,820 Likes Received
    Bryant put up some good sack numbers at low level school. Think some had him as a 4th rounder till he did something stupid a week before the draft.
  8. CowboyDiver

    CowboyDiver Active Member

    123 Messages
    31 Likes Received
    You must not have been around very long....Nate Newton was the Kitchen
  9. RoyTheHammer

    RoyTheHammer Well-Known Member

    13,780 Messages
    686 Likes Received
    You read the part about running backs, too.. right?
  10. Ratmatt

    Ratmatt Active Member

    985 Messages
    106 Likes Received
    So we'll be battling Cleveland for guards who don't make the final cuts.
  11. funkytown

    funkytown Well-Known Member

    1,199 Messages
    162 Likes Received
    I wouldnt be willing to trade Tanner for any of those D-Lineman. We are going to need all of our RB depth this year.
  12. Fredd

    Fredd Well-Known Member

    4,994 Messages
    2,237 Likes Received
    Cleveland (or any team for that matter) isn't going to trade someone that starts to try to get depth at a position...they likely aren't going to want any of the guards that we would make available and I wouldn't want to see our RB's go with Murray being a smidgen brittle at times
  13. Cumart21

    Cumart21 Well-Known Member

    372 Messages
    283 Likes Received
    While I think our running back depth is important, I would definitely trade Tanner for a DL. I think he's a 3 yards in a cloud of dust type of RB, which could be replaced by a guy off the street.
  14. Pokes12

    Pokes12 Active Member

    570 Messages
    130 Likes Received
    Dez, Miles and Witren
  15. funkytown

    funkytown Well-Known Member

    1,199 Messages
    162 Likes Received
    I agree that RB's can be found anywhere, i'm not ready to give up on Tanner for a scrub defensive lineman.
  16. MichaelWinicki

    MichaelWinicki "You want some?" Staff Member

    38,152 Messages
    8,204 Likes Received
    Wake me up if a Dallas/Cleveland trade actually goes through.
  17. Cumart21

    Cumart21 Well-Known Member

    372 Messages
    283 Likes Received
    Well you get what you pay for. We aren't going to get much for Tanner. I think there's a better value in a guy who potentially gets cut.
  18. Manwiththeplan

    Manwiththeplan Well-Known Member

    8,597 Messages
    2,038 Likes Received
    I think anyone would, however, that would be like saying, "if the cowboys are willing to let Dez Bryant go, I'd make that trade," just because some article says we are looking to trade a receiver.
  19. Idgit

    Idgit Ice up, son. Ice up! Staff Member

    40,303 Messages
    18,613 Likes Received
    Yeah, we're obviously not talking Phil Taylor. We're talking a back-roster guy who, at best, has shown some promise.

    At this point heading into the season, we're only looking to shore up depth with young players or to potentially replace an injury prone OL with a guy with a similar physical build who looks to be healthier and have some room to develop over time. We're not going to be getting any meaningful snaps in a last-minute trade. Maybe we could at OG if Mack were to get hurt again and Kowalski is unavailable to take the starts.
  20. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    22,397 Messages
    2,972 Likes Received
    Tanner shouldn't be trade bait.
    He is our short yardage back.

    Dunbar OR Randle could be the guy they ship off IF they feel one of the lower end CLE DTs can help this year in a rotation.

    And NO Phil Taylor and Rubin are NOT available.
    They are talking bottom of the roster DTs, not rotational guys.

Share This Page