1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

California judge rules early cell phone termination fees illegal

Discussion in 'Off-topic Zone' started by WoodysGirl, Jul 31, 2008.

  1. WoodysGirl

    WoodysGirl Everything is everything... Staff Member

    69,008 Messages
    9,415 Likes Received
    Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:48PM EDT
    See Comments (70)

    Buzz up!on Yahoo!

    In one of the most significant legal rulings in the tech industry this year, a Superior Court judge in California has ruled that the practice of charging consumers a fee for ending their cell phone contract early is illegal and violates state law.

    The preliminary, tentative judgment orders Sprint Nextel to pay customers $18.2 million in reimbursements and, more importantly, orders Sprint to stop trying to collect another $54.7 million from California customers (some 2 million customers total) who have canceled their contracts but refused or failed to pay the termination fee.

    While an appeal is inevitable, the ruling could have massive fallout throughout the industry. Without the threat of levying early termination fees, the cellular carriers lose the power that's enabled them to lock customers into contracts for multiple years at a time. And while those contracts can be heinously long, they also let the carriers offer cell phone hardware at reduced (subsidized) prices. AT&T's two-year contract is the only reason the iPhone 3G costs $199. If subsidies vanish, what happens to hardware lock-in? Could an era of expensive, but unlocked, hardware be just around the corner? It's highly probable.

    Of course, the carriers aren't going to take this lying down. Early termination fees are seen as critical to business, so carriers are expected to look for ways to reclassify the fees (such as by calling them "rates," part of the arcane set of laws that covers the telecommunications industry). The industry is also pushing for the federal government to step in and claim oversight over the early termination fee issue, which would invalidate any state ruling. The FCC is generally more tolerant of such fees, though Chairman Kevin Martin has proposed a plan whereby the fees are decreased the closer you are to the end of your contract.

    The FCC may also buy the argument that, since carriers are nationally based (and consumers can use their phones anywhere in the country), that a single policy should apply across the nation, rather than creating a patchwork of legislation that could lead to confusion and chaos caused by having 50 different policies.

    Is the early termination fee dead? Not yet, but it's looking a little haggard.
  2. the kid 05

    the kid 05 Individuals play the game, but teams beat the odds

    9,541 Messages
    3 Likes Received
    sa-weeet all i need is this to happen in IL now :)
  3. tomson75

    tomson75 Brain Dead Shill

    16,714 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Great. Now hop skip and jump your *** to Virginia and make it happen here too.
  4. trickblue

    trickblue Old Testament...

    29,160 Messages
    472 Likes Received
    Finally... some sense come from California Courts...

    The other 56 states applaud you! (DC and Puerto Rico too)...

    [IMG]
  5. Mavs Man

    Mavs Man All outta bubble gum

    4,668 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    [IMG]

Share This Page