Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by WoodysGirl, Feb 22, 2013.
I completely agree.
You, my friend, are peeing up a tree trying to talk to that kid.
Don't you know that he's been a Cowboy fan since 1988!
Makes sense to me, Flacco should set the market. Romo shouldn't make more than a superbowl-winning QB in the off-season after his superbowl victory.
And I hear that you spell "lose" the right way if you had stayed in school.
You can kill them with Raid...roaches too!
and another village has lost one
but I like crickets. They taste just like chicken.
step away from my village.
I'm not for or against Flacco, but I think you should review his numbers again before saying that. He was indeed terrible his first four playoff games, but he got better in 2010 and played very well in 2011. His team rode his coattails going into New England in the 2011 Championship game. Billy Cundiff's shank lost that game, not Flacco. He has gotten better in the playoffs for the last four years.
Just stating what is overall playoff performance had been up until this year. Some good games and some of the worst games in the history of the NFL. I think his team even won a game once when his QB rating was under 20. And he once had a QB rating of 10...no misprint, 10. Lowest ever in a playoff game.
Going into this year he had as many ints as TDs in the postseason
But I do give him credit for improving. He was good last year and even better this year in the post season.
Must be nice to have the team good enough that you can be an average regular season QB and still make the palyoffs every season. It's great for developement.
BTW, was not making any kind of statement about Romo's contract and I do think Flacco should get paid well.