ROFL. I can never tell if this is schtick or just poor logic. Did you bother to even look at the starter list for that article? Nate Livings. James Hanna, Will Allen. The simply truth is no one knew how Marinelli was employing our DL. It was guesses or trial moves. Initially most thought Ratliff was a 3T and Crawford was a SDE. Then nope, Ratliff is a 1T. Hatcher a 3T with Ben Bass RIGHT on his heels. Allen was beaten out by Wilcox then released. Hanna played a small portion of plays to the point we went out and got a full back. Only a complete moron thinks a 2nd year 3rd round pick who was a rotational player as a rookie has little to no value. You know who else wasn't on that list? Orlando Scandrick. Again the 22 starter nonsense is too limited to scope to mean much of anything. Did Livings being out hurt us? Did that hurt us more than Crawford? What about Will Allen? IF he had torn up a knee that's just as bad as Crawford right? The metric is stupid. STUPID. POINTLESS towards anything. BUT THE MOST HILARIOUS THING OF ALL...Quoting an article that claims to negate Crawford AFTER HE WAS INJURED. That article was July 25th... he was injured on the 22nd and ruled out for the season by the 23rd.