1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Hindsight is 20-15

Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by cc cowboy, Apr 30, 2006.

  1. cc cowboy

    cc cowboy Member

    144 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    I would have rather had Eslinger (center) in the 6th and Rod Wright (NG) in the 7th (both available after our picks) than the two nobodys we picked at those positions in the 6th and
    7th. The problem is that they did not call and ask me. They must not have me new number.
  2. Sarge

    Sarge Red, White and Brew... Staff Member

    20,876 Messages
    1,767 Likes Received

    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< crickets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  3. cobra

    cobra Salty Bastard

    3,134 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I'm going to go with Jeff Ireland's analysis over your analysis.
  4. VTEXPRESS

    VTEXPRESS New Member

    33 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Wright is not a Nose Guard.
  5. cc cowboy

    cc cowboy Member

    144 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Thanks for the reply ... did you say this on every pick of this draft where anyone had an opposing opinion or are you just trying to .... never mind.
  6. Jay

    Jay Active Member

    1,622 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Only reason Wright isn't a nobody to you is because you're probably a UT fan. Stanley fits the 3-4 better, and will be better, mark it.
  7. DallasEast

    DallasEast Cowboys 24/7/365 Zone Supporter

    28,268 Messages
    1,786 Likes Received
    On Eslinger...

    We already have Gurode and Johnson at center. They haven't proven that they are the best options at center, yet. But they ARE interchangeable options at center. Who is the real option behind Ferguson? "Thomas Johnson"? So, if we were to use hindsight, at the 182nd slot was to chose Eslinger at center instead of selecting a viable backup and possible successor to Ferguson in Stanley.

    Me? I preferred the Stanley pick over Eslinger at 182.

    On Wright...

    Even after the Fabini acquisition, we still need better options at right tackle. Is McQuistan a good option? We'll see, but at the 211st slot it was a better decision to go OT than DT. Combine that with the fact that 15 teams passed over Wright after we selected McQuistan AND 12 additional teams passed over him at least TWICE.

    Well, I'm okay with the fact that we didn't select Wright. Good luck to him, though.

Share This Page