1. Like to discuss POLITICS? Come join us at PUNNDITS.com!
    If you like discussing politics and other related topics then your new home (hopefully) for doing just that can be found on Punndits.com! Come join us and help us grow Punndits into a wonderful and safe place to discuss politics with everyone.
    Dismiss Notice

How about Trent Richardson with first pick?

Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by Joe Realist, Mar 25, 2012.

  1. Joe Realist

    Joe Realist No Kool-Aid here!

    8,311 Messages
    1,189 Likes Received
    Trade Felix for what you can get (I don't see him being resigned at moment). I like Murray, but his history of injuries concerns me.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. GloryDaysRBack

    GloryDaysRBack Well-Known Member

    11,262 Messages
    2,853 Likes Received
    i thought about this idea the other day..it took me all of 2 seconds to determine that this team has so many holes that we cant justify taking Richarson
     
  3. Joe Realist

    Joe Realist No Kool-Aid here!

    8,311 Messages
    1,189 Likes Received
    He might just be BPA at the time and the best RB in the draft.
     
  4. Cowboy Brian

    Cowboy Brian 3.141529 Zone Supporter

    12,199 Messages
    440 Likes Received
    Don't think he will be there and with what Murray showed last year no need.

    Felix wouldn't fetch much in a trade, maybe a 4th rounder if that. Rather hold on to him. Murray has injury concerns yes but not they are not enough to justify spending the 14th pick in the draft on a RB.
     
  5. Dmoore Esq

    Dmoore Esq Member

    170 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    He's gone before we pick and we're not moving up to get him.
     
  6. reddyuta

    reddyuta Well-Known Member

    10,849 Messages
    3,745 Likes Received
    I think we pick him if he is there at 14.
     
  7. xwalker

    xwalker Well-Known Member

    23,233 Messages
    12,968 Likes Received
    He would be BPA at #14. I think some team would trade up for him.
     
  8. GloryDaysRBack

    GloryDaysRBack Well-Known Member

    11,262 Messages
    2,853 Likes Received
    trade down to 22..browns would definitely move up for him

    get an extra 3rd rd pick

    at this point in time..trading down is by far my favorite option
     
  9. Eskimo

    Eskimo Well-Known Member

    12,821 Messages
    496 Likes Received
    I would take Richardson but only if we had a 1st round offer on the table for Murray.
     
  10. casmith07

    casmith07 Attorney-at-Zone

    30,268 Messages
    6,057 Likes Received
    No thanks. Good trade bait though.
     
  11. SDogo

    SDogo Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ev

    13,899 Messages
    5 Likes Received
    Contingent on several factors but as the way all things set right now, no.
     
  12. Risen Star

    Risen Star Likes Collector Zone Supporter

    33,525 Messages
    35,465 Likes Received
    I'm for it. It would be a grand larceny steal at 14.
     
  13. GloryDaysRBack

    GloryDaysRBack Well-Known Member

    11,262 Messages
    2,853 Likes Received
    lmfao..it would be dumber than dumb

    you think CB is an overrated position and value RBs..unbelievable
     
  14. Fredd

    Fredd Well-Known Member

    4,995 Messages
    2,238 Likes Received
    My hope is that both Richardson AND Tannehill are still there at #14 (possible)...then perhaps we can see a little bidding war going on to get that pick from us...I have thought about the Browns and there are others as well, but having both of those players available would be a fantastic thing for the Cowboys...a great problem to have...
     
  15. Eskimo

    Eskimo Well-Known Member

    12,821 Messages
    496 Likes Received
    I agree that most RBs aren't worth a first rounder.

    However, special RBs are worth it. Would you argue that Adrian Peterson, Emmitt Smith, Terrell Davis, Ladainian Tomlinson and Bryan Westbrook aren't worth first round picks (knowing what we know about their pro careers).

    I think Trent Richardson is worth it if he drops that far and would be a steal. However we are way too loaded at RB and would need a deal for Murray to make this deal make sense for our roster. I'd be okay with a high second round pick. If we can't get the deal done I wouldn't make the move as I don't want a roster with both Murray and Richardson. That is too much investment in a non-premium position.
     
  16. GloryDaysRBack

    GloryDaysRBack Well-Known Member

    11,262 Messages
    2,853 Likes Received
    this team has way too damn many holes to take a RB and hope and pray that he turns out to be a once in a decade type RB..we already have a damn good RB on this team..no way in hell do i do it
     
  17. TheCoolFan

    TheCoolFan Well-Known Member

    8,204 Messages
    748 Likes Received
    Man we're STILL on this? Helllllllllll no!

    Look at the past Super Bowl winning teams. How many of those teams had high draft pick/franchise RBs?
     
  18. Avery

    Avery The Dog that Saved Charleston

    9,663 Messages
    2,958 Likes Received
    I would actually take him at #14, but 1. He won't be and 2. I bet we could get an intriguing trade package at that spot.
     
  19. Eskimo

    Eskimo Well-Known Member

    12,821 Messages
    496 Likes Received
    Then why didn't the team ahead of us take that package. :confused:

    Just kidding.

    It could happen that way but I would prefer the elite player (Richardson) and then swing Murray's rookie season into a first round pick from a RB-hungry team.
     
  20. AsthmaField

    AsthmaField Outta bounds

    15,520 Messages
    10,305 Likes Received
    I'd take Richardson with the first pick and then trade Felix Jones to the highest bidder.

    If I could secure 41gy as Jones' agent to promote him to other teams, we could probably get a top 10 pick for Felix... maybe even multiple first round picks. :cool:
     

Share This Page