I don't think the NFC East has been this bad since 1999.

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by Red Dragon, Sep 20, 2013.

  1. SilverStarCowboy

    SilverStarCowboy The Actualist

    10,175 Messages
    1,756 Likes Received
    I think "your poor Cowboys"...then realize who is really at fault in Dallas.
  2. nake

    nake Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    6,493 Messages
    3,012 Likes Received
    I think we have the makings of a team that will get stronger as the season goes on. Not just getting back Spencer and Ratliff at some point, but getting more out of our new players as they become acclimated to playing for the Cowboys. That would mean the Boys and the rest of the NFC East could be heading in opposite directions, although based on recent history I personally wouldn't count the Giants out until they are mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. As long as RGIII and Vick are starting for the Skins and Eagles, I don't expect to see much out of them. My biggest concern is the Eagles will bench Vick and start Foles.
    ScipioCowboy likes this.
  3. iceman117

    iceman117 Active Member

    740 Messages
    137 Likes Received
    it's still a better division than the AFC east and AFC north. It may not have the dominant team but the division is still very tough, no one is walking through any of these teams and there is no easy games in this division plus any of the 4 teams can reasonably win the division so I wouldn't call it a weak division.
  4. burmafrd

    burmafrd Benched

    43,820 Messages
    3,379 Likes Received
    Don't know what you have been watching but to claim this division is tough is hilarious.
  5. iceman117

    iceman117 Active Member

    740 Messages
    137 Likes Received
    Hilarious? I've been watching the same thing as you except I know better than to project an entire season off of 2 games, obviously you don't. Washington/Giants are struggling right now but they both will bounce back and win games they aren't supposed to (both will go 8-8 or 9-7). Eagles most likely are what they are right under a .500 team(6-10 or 7-9) and the Cowboys will be fine (9-7 or 10-6) they lost to a playoff caliber team on the road, I'm not throwing in the towel on the season because of it. The idea that the division is going to be this year terrible after 2 weeks is laughable. Come on please tell me you're more knowledgeable than that.

    RGIII didn't have a pre-season but if you don't think he is going to shake the rust off and play better than he has been your nuts. Jim Hasslett isn't going to have that defense playing this poorly either, they are going to play better as the year goes on.

    Giants have some injuries still on their offensive line and have been turning the ball over like crazy, (6 in week 1 and 4 in week 2) I highly doubt they turn the ball over 80 times this year cuz that's what they are on pace to do. JPP also didn't have a pre-season and once he gets going they will have a disruptive DLINE again, they are also going to play a lot better.

    so yes the NFC east is still a VERY tough division despite the way things have gone the first 2 weeks of the season.
  6. Chocolate Lab

    Chocolate Lab Run-loving Dino

    33,928 Messages
    2,894 Likes Received
    This division is lousy and has been lousy for a while. The last two years we've played for the division title at 8-7, for crying out loud. Several years ago that would've got you third place.
    PA Cowboy Fan and links18 like this.
  7. links18

    links18 Well-Known Member

    13,422 Messages
    5,044 Likes Received
    I seem to remember some pretty tough games between the Rams and Seahawks for the NFC West title a few years ago. That didn't prevent them from stinking compared to the rest of the league.
    Chocolate Lab likes this.
  8. AmberBeer

    AmberBeer Well-Known Member

    5,374 Messages
    2,670 Likes Received
    Using teams records to say that a division is weak is short sighted and naive. Their records aren't good because they beat up on each other.
  9. Chocolate Lab

    Chocolate Lab Run-loving Dino

    33,928 Messages
    2,894 Likes Received
    In 2007 the records were 13-3, 10-6, 9-7, and 8-8.

    I guess they played fewer division games back then. :confused:
  10. ScipioCowboy

    ScipioCowboy More than meets the eye.

    17,853 Messages
    6,275 Likes Received
    This is my take on it.

    The Cowboys are potentially set up to improve as the season goes on. It's not just getting players like Ratliff and Spencer back and getting Brian Waters to re-acclimate himself to the NFL. It's the younger players who should improve as the season moves forward, like Leary, Frederick, Wilcox, and Williams.
  11. Plankton

    Plankton Well-Known Member

    7,072 Messages
    6,875 Likes Received
    Irvin was on pace for 40 catches and 640 yards when he got hurt. Gailey was not a fan of his, and was trying to phase him out. I know that we all like to get nostalgic, but what was stated above was just not true.

    The 1999 team was a decent team who were not going to be able to hang with the top teams in the league, Irvin or no Irvin.
  12. jobberone

    jobberone Kane Ala Staff Member

    49,961 Messages
    13,261 Likes Received
    One Cowboys team started 0-2 and won a SB. A Giants team did the same. Wasn't Wash something like 3-6 last year at one point? It's too early to make predictions IMO.

    Wash looks bad, true. See above.
    Philly looks dangerous to me.
    NY always worries me.
    We aren't burning it up exactly but I like our chances.

    Guess we'll have to play the season out anyway.
  13. AmberBeer

    AmberBeer Well-Known Member

    5,374 Messages
    2,670 Likes Received
    Typical BSPN'ish type take. Take one season and use that as justification for a bigger cause. Try again.

Share This Page