1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

KC and SD are 2 teams the Cowboys spoke to...

Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by a_minimalist, Apr 25, 2012.

  1. a_minimalist

    a_minimalist Well-Known Member

    4,690 Messages
    131 Likes Received
    Ed Werder just reported the teams the Cowboys have spoken with about trading up and trading down. Kansas City to trade up and San Diego to trade down.
  2. Woods

    Woods Active Member

    12,375 Messages
    11 Likes Received
    Depending who is there at 14, I wouldn't mind a small trade down with SD to 18 and an extra 3rd.

    That's especially true if we have 3-4 guys rated about equally (which may actually be the case from what I can gather).
  3. Cowboy Junkie

    Cowboy Junkie leonargized

    2,512 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Kansas City does not surprise me. KC reported in a few places interested in Barron. Dallas reported most every where high on Barron and now KC and Dallas talking trade. hmmm
  4. NeonDeion21

    NeonDeion21 Well-Known Member

    2,136 Messages
    493 Likes Received
    To trade up to #11 it would cost us #81 and we would most likely get a 5th or 6th back. If that's what I took to get Barron I wouldn't mind it considering we got an extra 4th this year.
  5. JBell523

    JBell523 That's my Quarterback

    3,359 Messages
    586 Likes Received
    Trading partners with SD?

    Interesting since they both want Barron. Wonder who else SD has in mind.
  6. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    23,572 Messages
    2,434 Likes Received
    Makes sense.


    As for a trade up; it would be for Cox, not Barron. If KC wanted Barron, they why would they trade with a team that also wanted him?
    Plus coachspeak just said he has info saying we would only want Barron in a trade down scenario.
    I could not see going up for him anyway. but JMO
  7. funkytown

    funkytown Well-Known Member

    1,023 Messages
    54 Likes Received
    True. Would obviously be done because Barron is off the board. SD wants defense I assume. Would they trade up for Brockers? Poe?
  8. NeonDeion21

    NeonDeion21 Well-Known Member

    2,136 Messages
    493 Likes Received
    SD needs pass rushers and could use a WR like Michael Floyd if he fell.
  9. funkytown

    funkytown Well-Known Member

    1,023 Messages
    54 Likes Received
    Not sure i'd be ok with givng up 81 to secure Barron.
  10. Risen Star

    Risen Star Likes Collector Zone Supporter

    22,775 Messages
    10,069 Likes Received
    I really hope this kind of information isn't accessible to the media.
  11. NeonDeion21

    NeonDeion21 Well-Known Member

    2,136 Messages
    493 Likes Received
    I would love the trade back to #18. There will be some quality players there.
  12. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    23,572 Messages
    2,434 Likes Received
    Me neither. 81 could be a valuable pick this year.
  13. reddyuta

    reddyuta Well-Known Member

    6,282 Messages
    710 Likes Received
    that is a bad move,a 3rd rder should ideally be a starter for us down the line,we are not that deep to be throwing away 3rd rd picks.
  14. NeonDeion21

    NeonDeion21 Well-Known Member

    2,136 Messages
    493 Likes Received
    I think we would likely move down in the 2nd to recoup that pick.
  15. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    23,572 Messages
    2,434 Likes Received
    Yeah, not too far down to miss out but still could pick up an extra pick.
  16. a_minimalist

    a_minimalist Well-Known Member

    4,690 Messages
    131 Likes Received
    Barron, IMO, is a blue chip player. Him and DeCastro. Barron will have an impact that is felt more though.
  17. wittenacious

    wittenacious Active Member

    2,805 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I wouldn't mind seeing that trade either, for an extra 3rd. The Chargers have the 15th pick in the 3rd Round (worth 195 pts.). The Cowboys have the 18th pick in the 3rd, so it's even an improvement over where we're currently sitting.

    200 pt. difference between our R1 14th pick and their 18th pick. Fair trade range, on the face of it. Maybe get SD's 19th pick in R7 (worth 7 pts.) too. Not to be greedy, but if they're the ones that want to move up, why should we come up short on trade value points?
  18. a_minimalist

    a_minimalist Well-Known Member

    4,690 Messages
    131 Likes Received
    I hate the idea of trading down and will be pissed if they do. But, if they snag the extra 7th rounder it will stop me from using a few curse words and punching or kicking an object once or twice. They should ask for more than is expected from some point chart.
  19. Bowdown27

    Bowdown27 Well-Known Member

    2,686 Messages
    283 Likes Received
    If cox or Barron falls to 11 we jump up if not we trade back to San Diego spot.
  20. Sitting Bull

    Sitting Bull Active Member

    1,433 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I don't want to give up our third to get Barron. We've got other needs and that is a value pick.

    I don't like the trade down because I doubt Brockers or DeCastro make it past Philly and Cincy. I think a trade down gets us Poe.

    Just pick your player, Jerry.

Share This Page