LaVar Arrington or Julian Peterson

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by SALADIN, Mar 18, 2006.


    SALADIN Jumper

    1,787 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    If you had a to chose one of the two, which one would it be and why?
  2. RealCowboyfan

    RealCowboyfan Championship

    4,587 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I say Julian Peterson because he is more willing to learn than Lavar Arrington..

    Arrington free lances too much with no instincts.. Lavar isn't no L.T.
  3. neosapien23

    neosapien23 Well-Known Member

    2,875 Messages
    122 Likes Received
    I would rather have Arrington, but with a contract like TOs. If he won't stop freelancing Dallas could cut all ties without being tied down to a huge signing bonus. That contract would also ensure he sticks to his assigments. He and Ware would have great pass rush potential.
  4. wileedog

    wileedog Well-Known Member

    11,049 Messages
    1,832 Likes Received
    I'd take Peterson because of the versatility he brings, but if we got either I'd officaily homer out and start predicting SB victories and stuff.
  5. Cowboys&Caps

    Cowboys&Caps New Member

    1,701 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Lavar is a slob:D
  6. ThreeSportStar80

    ThreeSportStar80 Benched

    27,093 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Julian Peterson all day, because he's not a head case like Lavar and would be open to playing in a Cowboys uniform.
  7. InmanRoshi

    InmanRoshi Zone Scribe

    18,334 Messages
    79 Likes Received
    Peterson can be a pretty good player in this defense.

    Lavar can be a Hall of Famer.

    Lavar's supposed freelancing is overblown. If it was really that much of a problem, why is Marv Lewis trying to bring him to Cincy? Julian Peterson is no rocket scientist either. Dude scored a 5 on his Wonderlic.
  8. Cowboy4ever

    Cowboy4ever Well-Known Member

    2,853 Messages
    904 Likes Received
    J. Peterson, 2 reasons, very good player and has NEVER been a redskin.

    SALADIN Jumper

    1,787 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    I tend to agree InmanR.

    How long has it been since the Cowboys had that young, explosive, catalytic player.

    I like Peterson a lot, but if B.P. can real Arrington in, the skys the limmit for him. He's never had a coach who knows more about the LB position than Parcells.
  10. Clove

    Clove Shrinkage

    47,260 Messages
    8,218 Likes Received
    If he scored a -2 on that test, I wouldn't care, as long as he can smash QBs and RBs.
  11. jrumann59

    jrumann59 Well-Known Member

    7,452 Messages
    2,087 Likes Received
    Ok I live in the DC area and Lavar is almost as bad as TO when it comes to his head games. He hides barbs in comments to the media about coaching, he doesn't take responsibility for his actions on the field. He still thinks he is in college ball where he can leap over the line and cream the quarterback, as much as I love RW our defense doesn't need another liability on the field.

    EMMITTnROY Well-Known Member

    3,104 Messages
    1,988 Likes Received

    Roy Williams..
    Demarcus Ware..
  13. SuperMan313

    SuperMan313 Benched

    31 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Julian Peterson definately.
  14. DBoys

    DBoys New Member

    4,713 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I dislike LaVar and he said he does not want to be a Cowboy. Plus Lavar would break the bank.
  15. TheHustler

    TheHustler Active Member

    5,392 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Irrelavant. Lavar does not want to play here.
  16. Dallas22

    Dallas22 New Member

    418 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I think that LaVar is a better all around LB but Peterson is probably a better fit. The main reason is because Peterson would play OLB while LaVar is an ILB. I would love to have both, but we just signed the J-Ville ILB and we are in need of someone to take over Singleton's OLB spot (especially is he is not healthy yet).

    Anyways, I hope that we can keep Larry Allen, get 1-2 more decent to good LB's, a GOOD kicker (VERY important!) and a Saftey to compliment Roy Williams (again, VERY important). If we can get these things "fixed" ASAP and through the draft, then I truely think that the Cowboys will be a MAJOR factor in the NFC and will make a REAL run at the Super Bowl in 2006...

    ... of course there are still other factors to worry about like team chemenstry AND the ever-annoying injury bug :(


  17. Rack Bauer

    Rack Bauer Federal Agent

    22,919 Messages
    1,018 Likes Received


    He's been an OLB his whole career, and his style of play would be perfect as an OLB in the 3-4.

    That said, I don't want him.
  18. dallasfaniac

    dallasfaniac Active Member

    4,196 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Arrington and Peterson have two different styles of play. I have never thought Arrington was as good as his hype and think that Peterson would fit our defense better anyway. I remember watching a 49ers game (wife is a fan) and watched Peterson cover the slot receiver and pick the pass. The thing is, this wasn't a slant or anything, he actually had to turn and run with the receiver. Granted he didn't do much of that in his career, averaging 1 pick a year, but that play stuck out in my mind. Personally between Arrington and Peterson's injuries and issues, I say pass on both unless the contract is Cowboy friendly.
  19. Rack Bauer

    Rack Bauer Federal Agent

    22,919 Messages
    1,018 Likes Received

  20. Dallas22

    Dallas22 New Member

    418 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    OOOPS, sorry about that... my fault.

    In that case, I say TAKE ARRINGTON... he is a monster. If the Cowboys go with Peterson though, I wouldn't be too upset. Either way, if we can get 1 of these 2 guys, it would be better than what we have there now to play opposite of D.Ware. Singleton is still not 100% off his injury and he never really stood out in our 3-4 defense.


Share This Page