Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by WoodysGirl, Oct 28, 2013.
This quote made me LOL!
This is turning out to be a funny thread.
I was actually defending Romo. No QB should have to deal with that nonsense. Just because I don't believe in his talent, that doesn't mean I can't be objective.
Don't see the problem since we can't "organize and adjust" even when Dez isn't going off, which has been displayed the past 3 years.
Notice in the second video, we have a leader and a diva colliding
Come on Dez, you're doing it wrong.....
These quotes are taken out of context. They make Irvin seem more critical of Dez than he really was.
lol, great thread.
I love how we have 4 pages about what Dez did, didn't do, should have done, etc..
Why is that funny to me?
Because no one on this forum still has any clue what was being said..
Yet everyone wants to talk like they know exactly what was going down.. good stuff.
This. heard them on the radio this morning and it wasn't that critical as they seem.
I agree. He was totally frustrated and vented. Maybe it was ill-timed and childish, but he vented because of frustration. It's the same old - same old and he's pissed about it. I get that.
Let's just say his team kept him involved (so did our defense).
That Brady incident was the first thing I thought about when the Dez situation occurred and started generating a lot of talk by television/radio commentators.
Of course, the rings are the great equalizer - or in this case, unequalizer.
I heard it on NFL Network, and I agree. It wasn't as harsh as it currently sounds.
But you can go after anybody else.. Notice Mike didn't say Dez couln't blow up on the sidelines nor did he deny he never did it...
Pretty much every Patriot game I see Tom is going off about something.
He's pretty intense.
Don't change Dez, it's nice to have someone around here with some fire for a change.
If you read Witten's lips you can see that he says "then go away" three times.
Also, will Dez be fined for the F bomb into the camera? It's akin to giving the finger to fans. A precedented no-no.