1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Mock I did well before the Kiper Invitational

Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by Sifillest, Feb 17, 2013.

  1. Sifillest

    Sifillest Member

    474 Messages
    5 Likes Received
    That I didn't want to release prior to the actual draft starting...because I thought that it could potentially damage my board....little did I know....that my board was crushed right after I traded down!

    Didn't stick to this at all but...:banghead:




    My Mock:
    18)DE-Sam Montgomery
    47)OG-Larry Warford
    80)RB- Stepfan Taylor
    111)OC- Brian Schwenke
    144)WR-Marquise Goodwin
    175)DT-Montori Hughes
  2. robert70x7

    robert70x7 Active Member

    1,055 Messages
    9 Likes Received
    If we drafted Sam Montgomery at 18, I would punch a hole right through my television.
  3. Sifillest

    Sifillest Member

    474 Messages
    5 Likes Received
    you're a violent little chap aren't cha?:D
  4. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Bad Santa Staff Member

    61,260 Messages
    4,584 Likes Received
    He would be justified.:laugh2:
  5. Sifillest

    Sifillest Member

    474 Messages
    5 Likes Received
    Meh, I feel end is a slightly higher priority for us than DT.
  6. robert70x7

    robert70x7 Active Member

    1,055 Messages
    9 Likes Received
    Tea leaves point to Spencer being retained, as he should be. They drafted Tyrone Crawford with their 2nd pick in last year's draft.

    Name the last time the Cowboys spent higher than a 6th round draft pick on a DT or when was the last time they signed a big name free agent DT?

    I'll save you time. Willie Blade in 2001. Unless you trust a rotation of Ratliff/Lissemore/Hatcher then DT is a much higher need than end.
  7. ABQcowboyJR

    ABQcowboyJR Well-Known Member

    2,929 Messages
    130 Likes Received
    You need both an end and dt. Which ever one is higher on the board gets the nod.
  8. robert70x7

    robert70x7 Active Member

    1,055 Messages
    9 Likes Received
    Ware/Spencer/Crawford/Butler/Wilber > Ratliff/Lissemore/Hatcher/Callaway
  9. ABQcowboyJR

    ABQcowboyJR Well-Known Member

    2,929 Messages
    130 Likes Received
    I'm not holding my breath on Spence being here. I'm not sure how good Crawford is yet.
  10. Risen Star

    Risen Star Likes Collector Zone Supporter

    22,676 Messages
    9,903 Likes Received
    I agree we need both. It really comes down to opportunity. What's there when we pick.
  11. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Bad Santa Staff Member

    61,260 Messages
    4,584 Likes Received
    Just to clarify... I don't have a problem with a DT or DE at that pick... However there are a few I would not like and that player is one of them.
  12. Sifillest

    Sifillest Member

    474 Messages
    5 Likes Received
    What you got against Sam BP?
  13. Shinywalrus

    Shinywalrus Active Member

    1,740 Messages
    8 Likes Received
    That may be true, but only 60% of the left side there is under contract. If Spencer doesn't get re-signed, you're looking at Crawford as a starter vs. a Rat/Lissemore/Hatcher situation at DT.

    I like Crawford, but hard to argue in that case that end doesn't become a more pressing area of concern.
  14. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Bad Santa Staff Member

    61,260 Messages
    4,584 Likes Received
    Slow First step
    Injury History
    Rumors of questionable work ethic
    Should have put up much larger numbers with the players around him getting attention
    Should not be taken in the top or middle of the round...should be closer to the end of the round at best IMO.

    Personally none of the LSU D Linemen are on my wish list for the first round.

    We should have much better players available to us in the first round.

Share This Page