1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by StevenOtero, Jan 9, 2008.

  1. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted

    The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.

    As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

    Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.

    Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?

    "The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

    "They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.

    "What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."


    ----------------------------------------------

    With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.

    [IMG]

    The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

    Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.
  2. zrinkill

    zrinkill Diamond surrounded by trash

    33,046 Messages
    793 Likes Received
    How is your grandpa doing Otero?
  3. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    Hard to say at this point. They took him off of the respirator and now he is back on it.
  4. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    Obama and Paul got screwed in New Hampshire.
  5. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
  6. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District
    Vote fraud confirmed, Clinton reversed mammoth pre-polling deficit to beat Obama, Diebold machines aid Giuliani, Romney

    Major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire are circulating after Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama with the aid of Diebold electronic voting machines, while confirmed votes for Ron Paul in the Sutton district were not even counted.

    According to a voter in Sutton, New Hampshire, three of her family members voted for Ron Paul, yet when she checked the voting map on the Politico website, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

    With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map still says zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below.

    [IMG]

    It's not as if Sutton had a handful of voters like some other districts - a total of 386 people voted yet we are led to believe that not one voted for Ron Paul? Judging by the Iowa results, around 10% of residents would be expected to vote for the Congressman, returning a total of around 38 votes in this district. Let's be ultra-conservative and say just 5% support Paul - he'd still get 19 votes - but he got absolutely none whatsoever. Is there something wrong with this picture?

    Greenville also tallied 144 votes yet not one for Congressman Paul.

    Anyone else in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul needs to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

    Diebold voting machines also did Congressman Paul no favors last night - compared to hand counted ballots Giuliani gained just short of 0.5% from electronic voting whereas Paul lost over 2%, which was the difference between finishing 4th and 5th, as this graph documents.

    Mitt Romney profited the most from the Diebold swing, he received 7% more votes compared to hand counted ballots.

    In the Democratic race the Diebold voting machines clearly swung the primary in Hillary Clinton's favor at the expense of Barack Obama, who had a commanding lead over the New York Senator going into the contest.

    Zogby polling numbers had Obama leading Clinton by a whopping 42/29 per cent, yet Clinton eventually took the primary by three per cent.

    "If I was Barack Obama, I'd certainly not have conceded this election this quickly," writes The Brad Blog. "I'm not quite sure what he was thinking. And as far as offering an indication of whether he understands how these systems work, and the necessity of making sure that votes are counted, and counted accurately, it does not offer a great deal of confidence at this hour."

    "While I have no evidence at this time --- let me repeat, no evidence at this time --- of chicanery, what we do know is that chicanery, with this particular voting system, is not particularly difficult. Particularly when one private company --- and a less-than-respectable one at that, as I detailed in the previous post --- runs the entire process."

    Clinton would not have beat Obama without the aid of Diebold voting machines. In precincts where electronic voting machines were used, Clinton got a 7% swing over Obama, having gained 5% in comparison to hand-counted ballots and Obama losing 2%.

    As we reported yesterday, the contract for programming all of New Hampshire's Diebold voting machines, which combined counted 81 per cent of the vote yesterday, is owned by LHS Associates, whose owner John Silvestro has gone to great lengths to deflect accusations that the machines can easily be rigged.

    After purchasing a Diebold 1.94w machine, the same system used in New Hampshire, a computer repair shop employee picked at random by Black Box Voting was able to zero in on the system's vulnerable memory card within just ten minutes. Hacking expert Harri Hursti testified in front of the New Hampshire legislature that the machines were wide open to fraud.
  7. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    Fraud like this automatically makes the New Hampshire primary void. The Paul campaign should demand a recount. There is no time at all to waste. $67k is nothing to expose cheating like that. They claim it is "human error". That excuse can be used for just about anything. This is no conspiracy people.
  8. arglebargle

    arglebargle Well-Known Member

    5,041 Messages
    145 Likes Received
    My knowlegeable friend in government said that there was a TV expose on how to easily rig Diebolt machine numbers recently. Maybe on Frontline? Will have to hunt for it.

    I am probably the only person here who has ever actually read any amount of official election returns. There were loads of errors in the handwritten noting and addition. Usually nothing of import, and mostly not likely to effect much. Usually elections were not close enough for these things to matter. But there is no reason not to think that ruthless politicos won't screw with any aspect of the system. Rules and traditions get bent and broken by the power hungry and greedy.

    I wouldn't put anything past spellingsome of these folks, including vote rigging. It's not like this has not happened in the USA before.
  9. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
  10. arglebargle

    arglebargle Well-Known Member

    5,041 Messages
    145 Likes Received
    If this is a widespread event (Paul's votes disappearing) he should pony up the money for a recount, if nothing else, to bring the fraud to the surface and force a closer scrutiny of the upcoming races.

    No one in the mainstream is willing to mention this sort of thing, as it really rocks the status quo. All the better for it to be exposed, if it is there.....
  11. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    I'm getting reports coming in that Obama could've been screwed too. So it just isn't Ron Paul getting robbed. The Town Clerk of Sutton claimed it was "human error". :rolleyes:
  12. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,451 Messages
    415 Likes Received
    Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton

    SOURCE

    We have caught Sutton red-handed. However, there are other other tonwships that have been reporting 0 votes, including Greenville, as sourced here:

    http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=NHREP9

    Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited ‘human error.’ What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:

    http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=news0807

    Ladies and gentlemen, this is a pattern. Let’s get this info out ASAP.
  13. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,821 Messages
    1,678 Likes Received
    There is NOTHING on CNN or any other main stream news outfit about this.
  14. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Bad Santa Staff Member

    61,243 Messages
    4,572 Likes Received
    I have no clue if any of this is true. Not to be mean but it falls back to the conspiracy stuff where if someone is always posting it, it is harder to believe at times.

    However I doubt if the mainstream media cares about Ron Paul.

    Now if this IS true, I will say that if Obama, instead of Hillary, won...then it would be in the mainstream media on BOTH bias news spots.
  15. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    19,900 Messages
    1,488 Likes Received
    Sorry dude but thats crazy.

    When Obama has surged CNN was praising him at heartily as they ever did Hillary. The Media jumps on front runners period. You'll see some individuals who get enamored with any single candidate but overall the guys who get attention win at the polls: See Huckabee and Obama after Iowa.

    I get 3 or 4 News magazines and almost every one of them had Huckabee on the cover with a big Obama article inside. CNN was reporting Hillary was done when Obama had 10 point polling leads the day prior to the NH vote.

Share This Page