NFL power rankings

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by LocimusPrime, Mar 19, 2017.

  1. mrtxstar

    mrtxstar Well-Known Member

    6,971 Messages
    3,500 Likes Received
    So you are saying the plan was to gut the defense and let the left over scrubs take over? Yeah, great plan. :rolleyes:
     
  2. Reverend Conehead

    Reverend Conehead Well-Known Member

    2,360 Messages
    1,513 Likes Received
    I'm not quite sure how they could even do power rankings right now when games aren't even being played.
     
  3. gimmesix

    gimmesix Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

    14,390 Messages
    4,652 Likes Received
    Although I'm not big on power rankings, I would think the fact that our offense is returning virtually intact would make us a top-10 team, since the offense was most responsible for our success.

    Right now, there is no indication the defense will allow us to end up much higher than that, which is the same as its been most years under Garrett.
     
    StarBoyz83 and cowboyblue22 like this.
  4. mrtxstar

    mrtxstar Well-Known Member

    6,971 Messages
    3,500 Likes Received
    So they aren't good enough to play for the Cowboys and the Cowboys can't afford to pay them. How convenient that worked out for everyone involved.... :muttley: You should be embarrassed to be peddling that garbage. The proof of your ridiculousness will be in how each of these individuals perform next season. So what, they have $12m in cap space. What good does it do when they don't invest it effective free agent contributors?
     
  5. FuzzyLumpkins

    FuzzyLumpkins The Boognish

    24,474 Messages
    10,077 Likes Received
    You want to pay Church or Carr $6m? You wanted to pay McClain $5m? You wanted to pay Wilcox $3m? You consider them "effective free agent contributors?"

    You were claiming that the team could not afford to pay them. You cannot figure out how them having cap space plays into that?

    You can talk about how I should be embarrassed but again I recommend introspection.
     
  6. mrtxstar

    mrtxstar Well-Known Member

    6,971 Messages
    3,500 Likes Received
    You are so in love with listening to yourself bloviate that you seems to have no time to listen to others. Did I advocate paying any of those bloated salaries? Nope, I agree with letting them walk if that means not paying those salaries but we have to invest in FA to upgrade those positions. Drafted players are cheap so don't tell me that is where the money saved is being spent. When is the FO going to reward it's fans with quality FA acquisitions?
     
  7. ActualCowboysFan

    ActualCowboysFan Benched

    2,388 Messages
    3,108 Likes Received
    :facepalm:
     
  8. pugilist

    pugilist Stick N Move

    4,717 Messages
    4,051 Likes Received
    power rankings in March?

    good lord this is going to be a long offseason
     
  9. Fletch

    Fletch To The Moon

    13,786 Messages
    5,675 Likes Received
    Addition by subtraction regarding the D.
     
  10. FuzzyLumpkins

    FuzzyLumpkins The Boognish

    24,474 Messages
    10,077 Likes Received
    If anyone is writing a bunch of nothing, bloviating, it is you. You assert a lot and support naught claiming that you could if you wanted to. That is bloviating.

    I asked a question. I never asserted you wrote that. Try and keep up.

    You did say that they could not afford to sign them and claimed that was why they were not resigned. You've just abandoned that instead of admitting you were wrong and are now moving to crying about not getting "quality" FA.

    PFF graded our moves at B or better and the Cowboys have not spent big money on large dollar UFA since Carr in 2013. We have gotten these modest 2 and 3 year deals and been better for it. The Cowboys reward us by putting together a competitive team and if you think that is done through big money FAs then you are ignorant.
     
  11. mrtxstar

    mrtxstar Well-Known Member

    6,971 Messages
    3,500 Likes Received
    blah blah blah. Bloviation
     
  12. LocimusPrime

    LocimusPrime Well-Known Member

    8,656 Messages
    18,507 Likes Received
    People are grouchy on Monday. Yeah Mondays are pretty bad.

    :popcorn:
     
  13. HoosierCowboy

    HoosierCowboy Put Pearson in the HOF

    2,283 Messages
    248 Likes Received
    I agree--who did we lose? I liked them all because they were Cowboys, but hey are all mediocre with no upside.
     
  14. Gameover

    Gameover Well-Known Member

    5,965 Messages
    1,836 Likes Received
    When did 7 become a bad ranking? Though we're better than the Giants.
     
  15. cowboyblue22

    cowboyblue22 Well-Known Member

    2,758 Messages
    1,670 Likes Received
    they have beaten the giants once in the last two years and it took a last minute comeback from tony for them to do that
     
    jobberone likes this.
  16. jobberone

    jobberone Kane Ala Staff Member

    49,409 Messages
    12,037 Likes Received
    We lost 4 DBs. Let me remind you many on here lamented Wilcox, Church, Carr and Mo as being worthless. Maybe you weren't but many wrung their hands over one or all many many times. Wanting them gone.

    This gives us an opportunity to add new blood and not keep paying for guys who were ok but not playmakers by any stretch.

    Personally I hate losing them all but when I think about it, we aren't so bad off. Heath isn't far behind Church or Wilcox if any. Mo couldn't stay on the field enough and Carr had trouble playing quick WRs. He had to muscle guys to play them well. I'd still like to have him on a friendly contract because he's a good matchup with some players.

    I'd like to have McClain but he couldn't stay healthy either.

    We'll be ok IF we have some depth.
     
    mrtxstar likes this.
  17. jobberone

    jobberone Kane Ala Staff Member

    49,409 Messages
    12,037 Likes Received
    Yeah, we have a problem with them for some reason. We hates Lucky Eli.
     
    mrtxstar likes this.
  18. mrtxstar

    mrtxstar Well-Known Member

    6,971 Messages
    3,500 Likes Received
    I hope you are right. I just don't see us recovering from that many guys walking away.
     
  19. jobberone

    jobberone Kane Ala Staff Member

    49,409 Messages
    12,037 Likes Received
    I think we'll likely be improved looking at the top 11 on D although again IDK about depth. I worry more about acquiring or having an edge rusher as I think depth is ok along the DL. LB is a little troublesome but I think it is likely ok. But at DB you need at least 7 who can start without a huge drop off in coverage. Teams run enough SPs that you have to have 7 DBs who can start generally three safeties and 4-5 CBs. You used to have two and hope you had two more who can step in due to injury. It's a different world now primarily due to the changes in coverage rules as well as the competence of the QBs and receivers AND the sophisticated passing offenses now.

    I used to think that Johnny U was the greatest QB of all time. And he was until the passing game and rules changed. Now any elite QB can read and defeat defenses. That's what makes them elite. Until then Unitas' only possible competitor was Otto Graham and I never saw Graham play.
     
    mrtxstar likes this.
  20. CCBoy

    CCBoy Well-Known Member

    25,123 Messages
    5,717 Likes Received
    Just sign Revis and await the draft...
     

Share This Page