And you people need to learn about logical fallacies and the distinction between criticizing a person's knowledge about the history of the game and the crappily supported editorial article he wrote are two different things, neither of which can be classified as pseudo intellectualism. By the way, the game has changed over the past twenty five years and you're right, I'm sure there's a lot that Gil Brandt has forgot. It just comes with age. Also, the collective knowledge of the total fans on this forum is probably pretty high. So way to shoot yourself in the foot.