Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by Nors, Jan 26, 2006.
Where are the forum rules anyway? Do they apply to PMs as well? :lmao2:
Check your in box
PMs shouldn't be offensive, threatening, or vulgar, just like the forums.
We did ban a poster one time for making threats of physical harm and racial overtones to another poster. Naturally we rely on the integrity of the posters not to do that. If it happens there's no way we can know about it without it being reported.
I'm not crazy about the use of ****, or *** and I do and will ask posters not to use them.
In other words RT_M
You denied your opinion on the subject had ever changed. He provided a link that showed it had. You responded by denying this.
It's there in black and white. You said it. Rather than saying you had changed your opinion and showing your evidence you choose to say that your evidence is proof and his isn't. It doesn't work that way.
In the past you've held several people to one opinion and one only on a subject. It is how you define that poster.
Here, in this case, you got called on the carpet for the exact same practice and it is excusable in your mind.
That's hypocritical. You hold others to a standard you won't adhere to yourself.
A man would accept the facts. A worm will try and wriggle out of them. From there it is your call on how you want to be defined.
In a thread with some very good football analysis it seems a shame to erase that in a vain effort to stand on a pedastal.
I apologize, but I'm not sure what that acronym means.
Read the blanking manual
You lost me. I'm probably being very dense. Sorry.
Time to get Charles involved.
Is he an acronym translator too?