1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Obama Makes Supreme Court Throws Out Janet Jackson Ruling

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by ConcordCowboy, May 4, 2009.

  1. ConcordCowboy

    ConcordCowboy Mr. Buckeye

    12,747 Messages
    2 Likes Received
    Just Kidding...JBond.

    :p:

    Supreme Court throws out Janet Jackson ruling

    Justices order appeals court to consider reinstating fine for nipple flash

    [IMG]
    The Supreme Court directed the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia to consider reinstating the $550,000 fine that the Federal Communications Commission imposed on CBS over Jackson’s breast-baring performance at the 2004 Super Bowl.
    View related photos


    WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a federal appeals court to re-examine its ruling in favor of CBS Corp. in a legal fight over entertainer Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction.

    The high court on Monday directed the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia to consider reinstating the $550,000 fine that the Federal Communications Commission imposed on CBS over Jackson’s breast-baring performance at the 2004 Super Bowl.

    The order follows the high court ruling last week that narrowly upheld the FCC’s policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television.

    In a statement, CBS said the Supreme Court’s decision was not a surprise given last week’s ruling and expressed confidence the court will again find the incident was not and could not have been anticipated by the network.

    Last year, the appeals court threw out the fine against CBS, saying the FCC strayed from its long-held approach of applying identical standards to words and images when reviewing complaints of indecency.

    The appellate court said the incident lasted nine-sixteenths of one second and should have been regarded as “fleeting.” The FCC previously deviated from its nearly 30-year practice of fining indecent broadcast programming only when it was so “pervasive as to amount to ’shock treatment’ for the audience,” the court said.

    The FCC appealed to the Supreme Court. The case had been put off while the justices dealt with a challenge led by Fox Television against the FCC’s policy on fleeting expletives.

    The case is FCC v. CBS Corp., 08-653.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30560265?GT1=43001
  2. JBond

    JBond Well-Known Member

    6,726 Messages
    36 Likes Received
    You reeled me in like a fish on a hook with that title.

    Well done!:D


    He does not run the Supreme court.......yet.;)
  3. ConcordCowboy

    ConcordCowboy Mr. Buckeye

    12,747 Messages
    2 Likes Received
    [IMG]

    :p:
  4. arglebargle

    arglebargle Well-Known Member

    5,033 Messages
    144 Likes Received
    Damn judicial activists! ;)
  5. CanadianCowboysFan

    CanadianCowboysFan Lightning Rod

    15,416 Messages
    372 Likes Received
    all that for a 1/10 of a second shot of a nipple, what a waste of money
  6. ConcordCowboy

    ConcordCowboy Mr. Buckeye

    12,747 Messages
    2 Likes Received
    BIG Time.
  7. Viper

    Viper Active Member

    2,190 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Just think of the revenue the government can generate by taxing nipples.:eek::

Share This Page