1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Obama's Edge in News Coverage

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by Bach, Aug 18, 2008.

  1. Bach

    Bach Benched

    7,645 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Obama's Edge in the Coverage Race

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/15/AR2008081503100.html?sub=AR

    By Deborah Howell
    Sunday, August 17, 2008; Page B06
    Democrat Barack Obama has had about a 3 to 1 advantage over Republican John McCain in Post Page 1 stories since Obama became his party's presumptive nominee June 4. Obama has generated a lot of news by being the first African American nominee, and he is less well known than McCain -- and therefore there's more to report on. But the disparity is so wide that it doesn't look good.

    In overall political stories from June 4 to Friday, Obama dominated by 142 to 96. Obama has been featured in 35 stories on Page 1; McCain has been featured in 13, with three Page 1 references with photos to stories on inside pages. Fifteen stories featured both candidates and were about polls or issues such as terrorism, Social Security and the candidates' agreement on what should be done in Afghanistan.

    This dovetails with Obama's dominance in photos, which I pointed out two weeks ago. At that time, it was 122 for Obama and 78 for McCain. Two weeks later, it's 143 to 100, almost the same gap, because editors have run almost the same number of photos -- 21 of Obama and 22 of McCain -- since they realized the disparity. McCain is almost even with Obama in Page 1 photos -- 10 to 9.

    This is not just a Post phenomenon. The Project for Excellence in Journalism has been monitoring campaign coverage at an assortment of large and medium-circulation newspapers, broadcast evening and morning news shows, five news Web sites, three major cable news networks, and public radio and other radio outlets. Its latest report, for the week of Aug. 4-10, shows that for the eighth time in nine weeks, Obama received significantly more coverage than McCain.

    Obama's dominance on Page 1 is partly due to stories about his winning the bruising primary battle with Hillary Rodham Clinton and his trip overseas in July. The coverage of June 4, 5, 6 and 7 led to six Page 1 stories in The Post, including Obama's nomination victory, his strategy, elation among African Americans over the historic nature of his win and his fundraising advantage. Then he made an appearance at Nissan Pavilion with Virginia's Gov. Timothy Kaine and Sen. James Webb, and it became a local Page 1 story. During those few days, there was one Page 1 reference to an inside-page story about McCain going after Clinton's disgruntled supporters.

    When Obama traveled to the Middle East and Europe, the coverage dwarfed that of McCain -- six Page 1 stories from July 19 to July 27, plus an earlier front-page story announcing the trip. McCain managed one Page 1 story and one Page 1 reference; the July 25 story said he might pick a vice presidential candidate soon, but that didn't happen. While there was no front-page story about Obama on July 25, it seemed wrong not to count that day because a photo of him in Berlin dominated the front page. I also counted a story about a Post-ABC News poll concerning racism and its potential impact on the election; 3 in 10 of those polled acknowledged racial bias.

    Not all Page 1 coverage has been favorable. Obama was hit right away with two Page 1 stories about Washington insider James A. Johnson, a former Fannie Mae CEO, who was criticized for mortgage deals and then withdrew from vetting Obama's potential running mates. A story about Obama's former Chicago church reminded readers of the controversy over his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. There were also stories with a favorable cast -- about his patriotism, his first appearance with Clinton and the coverage from his foreign trip.

    McCain's Page 1 stories were a mix -- a story about the flap over former senator Phil Gramm's comment about a "nation of whiners" over the economy and a story about conservatives wanting to battle McCain on the party platform. But there also were stories about plans to make the federal government more environmentally responsible and McCain's proposal for offshore drilling.

    The single most revealing story about McCain -- and one of the best Post stories on either candidate -- was a top-of-the-front-page look at McCain's intellect. The story, by veteran reporter and editor Robert G. Kaiser, was the kind of analysis that tells readers something they didn't know. It was neither positive nor negative, just revealing and insightful.

    Another favorite was by Business reporter Lori Montgomery on how both candidates will have trouble lowering the deficit with their spending plans. A Style & Arts change of pace was movie critic Stephen Hunter's look at McCain and Obama as film icons-- McCain as John Wayne and Obama as Will Smith.

    Page 1 coverage isn't all that counts, but it is the most visible. Certainly there were many stories on the Politics page and elsewhere in the paper. (I'm not counting opinion columns.) The Trail, The Post's politics blog, had dozens of short items about both candidates, all interesting to political junkies. Post inside coverage has been a mix of horse-race coverage -- stories about endorsements, advisers, who can win where -- and issues stories.

    Style stories have dealt with the Internet, voters and volunteers, and the cultural aspects of the campaigns. Cindy McCain was featured in a big Style spread and Michelle Obama in a Metro story about her recent visit to Virginia.

    Bill Hamilton, assistant managing editor for politics, thinks that I'm wrong to put weight on numbers. "We make our own decisions about what we consider newsworthy. We are not garment workers measuring our product every day to fulfill somebody's quota. That means as editors we decide what we think is important, because that's what our readers look for us to do -- not to adhere to some arbitrary standard.

    "The nomination of the first African American presidential nominee after a bitter primary campaign and his efforts to unite a party afterward were simply more newsworthy than a candidate whose nomination was already assured and who spent much of that time raising money. In the end, we can and should be judged on the fairness of our coverage, but that is a judgment that must be made over the course of the whole campaign, not a single period of time."

    Numbers aren't everything in political coverage, but readers deserve comparable coverage of the candidates.
  2. Angus

    Angus Active Member

    5,064 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    From the Post! What do you know . . . . . . . ?

    :)
  3. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Bad Santa Staff Member

    61,260 Messages
    4,584 Likes Received
    I have said it before and I will say it again as many times as someone (whines) about Obama's coverage.

    McCain should be HAPPY that Obama get's more coverage because it is less eyes on him and his gaffs and more eyes on Obama and his gaffs.
  4. iceberg

    iceberg detoxed...part 2 Zone Supporter

    28,347 Messages
    1,366 Likes Received
    yea. to me people spend far too much time and focus on being "fair" when in truth, it never will be. take your personal bag of crap and go is sometimes the best you can do. otherwise you get sidetracked on some strange stuff.
  5. bbgun

    bbgun Benched

    27,868 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Wouldn't it be cheaper just to send Obama roses?
  6. Bach

    Bach Benched

    7,645 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    The liberal media can almost taste it and they can't help themselves.
  7. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,845 Messages
    1,688 Likes Received
    The good thing about this is that more and more people are becoming aware of the liberal media and their bias and thus trusting them less. So overall its probably a good thing.
  8. masomenos

    masomenos Less is more

    5,971 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Look at the front page of our forum, who has more stories about him Obama or McCain? Look at the past 5 pages, same thing. Why would it be any different nationally, he's the one people want to talk about (for good or bad).
  9. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,845 Messages
    1,688 Likes Received
    And the media truly does what the public wants? Do you really think so?
  10. masomenos

    masomenos Less is more

    5,971 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Yes, they do what sells, they're a business.
  11. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,845 Messages
    1,688 Likes Received
    Then why are the newspapers losing money and readership?
    Why are the network news losing money and viewers?
  12. masomenos

    masomenos Less is more

    5,971 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Because more people get their news online?
  13. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,845 Messages
    1,688 Likes Received
    Maybe. But prove it. They have been losing viewers and readers for almost 20 years now. LONG before a lot of people were getting their news from online- which has really only been happening for maybe 10 years- AT BEST.
  14. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Bad Santa Staff Member

    61,260 Messages
    4,584 Likes Received
    One would think that if they have been losing viewers for 20 years, they would not have any viewers left by now and they would all be dead broke. Yet, cable news still has plenty of viewers and still get plenty of revenue.

    Newspapers and Magazines have lost revenue due to the net....that is pretty much a given.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=newspapers lose to internet&btnG=Google Search
  15. masomenos

    masomenos Less is more

    5,971 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    http://websearch.about.com/b/2008/03/03/where-do-you-get-your-news.htm


  16. Rackat

    Rackat Active Member

    2,134 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Thanks to TV and for the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative.
    - Kurt Vonnegut
  17. iceberg

    iceberg detoxed...part 2 Zone Supporter

    28,347 Messages
    1,366 Likes Received
    you could still choose to think for yourself and quit following the tv around.
  18. Rackat

    Rackat Active Member

    2,134 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Actually, I posted it for those that are die hard for one or the other. I don't watch much t.v., other than local news and some cable stuff (BSG, History, movies). I used to watch a lot of CNN and Fox news, switching back and forth to compare/contrast what was being said, until I got fed up with the malarkey that was being put out by both. Looked at CNBC and MSNBC and couldn't stomach either one of them.

    I subscribed to a couple of internet news sources, including the London Telegraph for expatriots, so that I had a broader view of world events. T.V. is not "my" main information source. I pity the people that depend on t.v. for their source information.
  19. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,845 Messages
    1,688 Likes Received
    Newspapers and Network News have been losing audience for almost 20 years. Trying to blame that on the internet- which really has been well used for only about the last 10- just does not wash.
  20. iceberg

    iceberg detoxed...part 2 Zone Supporter

    28,347 Messages
    1,366 Likes Received
    yea, i get that but appreciate the follow up. i don't really care who's biased one way or another, i make up my own mind and don't get my panties all bunched up when they're not nice to people i respect.

    for tv i do watch bbc america. pretty interesting views they put forth we don't really see in the "prime time" here. news here almost competes for entertainment value, not just news. with that, i put journalists for the most part up with actors. great you have a job where i get to know your name but that doesn't make you smart.

Share This Page