1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Parcells is 41-44 without Belicheck

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by REDVOLUTION, Dec 9, 2005.

  1. REDVOLUTION

    REDVOLUTION Return to Dominance

    25,286 Messages
    1,242 Likes Received
    One of the Spurts on PTI

    Bill Parcells is 41-44 without Bill Belicheck - making him mortal?

    Bill couldnt do it with Bledsoe back then with Pats.
    Can he do it NOW in Dallas?

    And that my fellow Cowboys fans is why we have faith and watch.

  2. TunaFan33

    TunaFan33 Benched

    1,824 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    That record is rather misleading, frankly.

    Parcells DID take New England to the playoffs in only his second year there. They finished that season on a 7 game win stread, and Bledsoe had a break-out season.

    Yeah-Bill B joined his staff after that awful 95 season, but so did Chris Palmer. Palmer had alot to do with helping Bledsoe to clean up his faulty mechanics in that Super Bowl year.

    BTW-Bill B can't do squat this year sans Weis and Crenell.
  3. dal0789

    dal0789 New Member

    592 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Did he do it with the giants???? YES
  4. Nors

    Nors Benched

    22,015 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Parcells took over a woefull Giants team, took over the worst team in NFL (Drafted Bledsoe #1 overall). And took over a dreadfull Jets team. They too may have been 1-15 year before his hire. He also took over a 5-11 Dallas team in a mess.

    What is Bellichecks career record as a HC?
  5. AbeBeta

    AbeBeta Well-Known Member

    25,612 Messages
    1,030 Likes Received
    What? Statistics don't lie. 41-44 means BP is a bad coach.

    Frankly Nors, I'm surprised after so much time here you still don't understand Cowboy Zone logic.
  6. HoustonSucks

    HoustonSucks Active Member

    693 Messages
    198 Likes Received
    And Belicheck was a world-beater in Cleveland.

    I'm SOOOO sick of hearing this. Who was that guy on PTI? Everytime he subs for Wilbonn I might as well mute the tv.
  7. TunaFan33

    TunaFan33 Benched

    1,824 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    You're joking, right?

    Everyone on ESPN is kind of missing the point-you NEED good personnel all around-regardless of who you are. The main reason why NE's hiccup season this year is that Belichick is now carrying a much heavier load with Weis and Crenell gone. When those 2 guys were there, Bill B entrusted them to bond with their respective players, make the game plans, et al. Now-their new DC(Eric Mangini) is no more than ordinary, and their OC is a committee of people. Overall-Belichick really doesn't have anyone he can trust this year.

    Not that Parcells' staff here is any better. Zimmer and DeHaven are awesome. However-Sean Payton isn't all that great, frankly. It seems like Bill P really doesn't have anyone he can rely on here either.
  8. silver

    silver Well-Known Member

    5,451 Messages
    344 Likes Received
    Im not impressed with Payton either, it just seems like he's handcuffed by BP in his play calling. Even Chan Gailey ran a more innovative offense than Sean Payton.
  9. AbeBeta

    AbeBeta Well-Known Member

    25,612 Messages
    1,030 Likes Received
    Funny. Why would BP specifically hand him the play-calling reigns then? If someone was handcuffing me like that, and I could stop it, why wouldn't I?
  10. silver

    silver Well-Known Member

    5,451 Messages
    344 Likes Received
    well, bp is an intimidating presence. i bet he has a lot of imput in the offensive game plan all week thus limiting the type of plays payton is allowed to call. whaddaya think?
  11. AbeBeta

    AbeBeta Well-Known Member

    25,612 Messages
    1,030 Likes Received
    I think if he approves everything Payton does.

    And I think blocking is handcuffing the offense. Not play calling (though that 3rd and 1 still pisses me off).
  12. zagnut

    zagnut New Member

    1,210 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Tom Landry never made it to a Super Bowl without Dan Reeves. Tom Landry is clearly an overrated bum.

    Tom Landry = 5 Super Bowls
    Dan Reeves = 8 Super Bowls

    Dan Reeves > Tom Landry

    (Sounds stupid, don't it.)
  13. ConcordCowboy

    ConcordCowboy Mr. Buckeye

    12,747 Messages
    2 Likes Received
    You are what you are!

    How many Super Bowls has he won? To be frank that's all I care about.
  14. jimmy40

    jimmy40 Well-Known Member

    15,206 Messages
    313 Likes Received
    Dan Reeves didn't win 3 Super Bowls to Landry's 2. What's stupid is the comparison.
  15. jimmy40

    jimmy40 Well-Known Member

    15,206 Messages
    313 Likes Received
    Who gives a crap? 3 Super Bowl wins.
  16. zagnut

    zagnut New Member

    1,210 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Both comparisons are stupid. Only the stupid can't see it.
  17. Bob Sacamano

    Bob Sacamano Benched

    57,073 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Bill has an whole lot of input in the whole team, and you dont' see the Defense struggling

    the problem is, the Oline is seriously handcapping our offense, just like RCB, and the pass-rush handcapped the D last year, and which made Zimmer look like an uncreative bafoon then, as what is making Payton look the same this year...

    execution is very underrated, and ask Bledsoe what he would like to change, he says their execution...
  18. Erik_H

    Erik_H Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun. Zone Supporter

    2,453 Messages
    81 Likes Received
    You should put that in your sig.

    :bow:
  19. jbsg02

    jbsg02 Active Member

    1,719 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    any coach would have trouble winning games with our o-line
  20. Doomsday

    Doomsday Rising Star

    10,404 Messages
    248 Likes Received
    Parcells is similar to Larry Brown they are willing to take on woeful franchises in desperate need of direction and turn them around. Id rather have guys like that than front runners who only take over loaded teams to boost their winning percentages / egos.

Share This Page