1. Like videos? Check out DirectDamage.com!

Photo: Romo not the reason Dallas can't win

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by jblaze2004, Jun 30, 2014.

  1. zack

    zack Well-Known Member

    2,270 Messages
    441 Likes Received
    Seriously, come on man. What you expect Romo not to sign a contract like that? You expect him to take less? You do know that if he was a FA, he was still going to sign a massive deal, right? If it wasn't here, it was going to be somewhere else. If you think otherwise, you are fooling yourself.
  2. Super_Kazuya

    Super_Kazuya Well-Known Member

    2,051 Messages
    1,138 Likes Received
    LOL, you are so full of crap it's funny. Luck was horrible in both games of the playoffs, it was his turnovers and inaccuracy that created the giant hole in a game they should have easily won. Holding that game up as some kind of pedestal for quarterback play shows how clueless you are. Alex Smith easily outplayed Luck and was fantastic all game long. What a laugh.
  3. Sportsbabe

    Sportsbabe Well-Known Member

    7,436 Messages
    2,336 Likes Received
    Now that IS my business ;)
  4. REDVOLUTION

    REDVOLUTION Return to Dominance

    28,534 Messages
    2,630 Likes Received
    Yes. Oh my. You nailed it. If you are speaking of JUST last year.

    Way to sample size it.

    As you were...
  5. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Backwoods Sexy Staff Member

    63,617 Messages
    7,328 Likes Received
    These are the kinds of threads where you find the people that think one Player is why a team wins or loses on a yearly basis and nobody else should share the blame...that is where, in your mind, you pull out a Bill Engvall catch phrase and (again in your own mind) say...here's your sign so you know not to have to deal with certain people.

    So you read someone saying that the reason this team loses is because of Tony Romo and nothing else...in your mind you say...
    [IMG]
    Heelsboy, DFWJC, 5Stars and 1 other person like this.
  6. kevm3

    kevm3 Well-Known Member

    1,262 Messages
    752 Likes Received
    We invested the majority of our resources into offense, so yes, the offense should have done more than the defense, especially since the defense was undermanned while the offense was mostly healthy.

    There's always going to be some thing or the other to blame. Romo is 'doing it all by himself'? How is that? We've spent year after year making the team "Romo friendly". The vast majority of our top pics went on offense. Just by doing that, your'e saying the offense should be skilled enough to carry the majority of the burden. Dez Bryant, Tyron Smith, Travis Fre
  7. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    26,637 Messages
    4,255 Likes Received
    No comments from me on Luck, but that poster you are responding to does not remotely understand the overall game of football.
    He and a few others badly degrade the quality of this website.
    5Stars likes this.
  8. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Well-Known Member

    2,929 Messages
    739 Likes Received
    What if making the offense Romo friendly was a strategic mistake by the brain trust that passes as a front office here? What if Romo needs a more "structured" offense that let's him do his thing but doesn't have to carry the team ever Sunday?
  9. ehcrossing

    ehcrossing Waiting for 6

    1,007 Messages
    663 Likes Received
    Anyone that watches this team play week after week and knows a damn thing about football should know Romo is not the one to blame for this teams lack of success. He is what keeps them from being a 3 -13 squad.
  10. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    6,952 Messages
    1,683 Likes Received
    The Romo-friendly moves are great stuff. I have never read about any changes that were Aikman-friendly, or in today's game, Manning-friendly . Some fan-friendly playoff and Super Bowl wins should have been the result, but it wasn't.
  11. Redball Express

    Redball Express All Aboard!!!

    3,497 Messages
    517 Likes Received
    Well..

    He's been hurt quite a bit and it's hurt his chances.

    But even way back when Parcells, Payton and a whole slew of good coaches and players rolled in and out...

    He still didn't and hasn't won but one playoff game.

    That's soon to be going on 8 years now.

    And if you want to count the last 3 seasons were we lost our last game to miss the playoffs..

    which were essentially 3 more playoff games for us..

    ..it starts to get really thick with reasons to move on soon.
  12. Dodger12

    Dodger12 Well-Known Member

    2,423 Messages
    944 Likes Received
    Romo can't be fired either; we're married to him and his salary. But this thread has gone on for 11 pages and I don;t see you tell anyone else to "give it a rest.". Why should Jerry be immune from criticism just because he isn't going anywhere? That's just silly.

    Jerry is the root of this team's problems. I dislike Garrett and disliked Wade Phillips even more but one man is responsible for bringing them here. People accepting (and defending Jerry) is a fan's version of Stockholm Syndrome.
    rcaldw likes this.
  13. Dodger12

    Dodger12 Well-Known Member

    2,423 Messages
    944 Likes Received
    Do you see anyone on this site can can do anything about any aspect of this team? If that was the criteria for posting, then no one would post or give their opinion.
    EGG likes this.
  14. Dodger12

    Dodger12 Well-Known Member

    2,423 Messages
    944 Likes Received
    Truth be told, this was one of the reasons we gave up two first round picks for Galloway. In addition, Jerry brought in an offensive minded HC in Gailey and let Aikman attend the workouts of potential draft picks (LaFleur) that Aikman gave his stamp of approval on before he was drafted.
  15. PA Cowboy Fan

    PA Cowboy Fan Well-Known Member

    2,319 Messages
    1,686 Likes Received
    And Aikman was on the decline by the time we got Galloway.
  16. Section444

    Section444 Well-Known Member

    4,792 Messages
    1,159 Likes Received
    Just two more years....
  17. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    6,952 Messages
    1,683 Likes Received
    Jerry has said that Galloway was a last effort to try and win one more Super Bowl with Aikman. He also said that it was a desperation move because he knew that the salary cap and age was ripping the team apart.
  18. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    6,952 Messages
    1,683 Likes Received
    Gailey was far from Aikman friendly. A totally different offense didn't help Troy. Galloway was a last effort for the Super Bowl by Jerry. LaFleur could be considered an Aikman move.
  19. Dodger12

    Dodger12 Well-Known Member

    2,423 Messages
    944 Likes Received
    Gailey followed Switzer and had success in Pittsburgh. We had some success his first year but the whole thing with benching Irvin for some scrub didn;t go over well. I say it was Aikman friendly in a sense that his hire was geared towards improving the offense.
  20. Animosity

    Animosity Active Member

    444 Messages
    189 Likes Received
    Sounds like what Romo did against the Redskins in that win and get in game. 3 interceptions.

    Only difference is that Luck rallied his team back and took responsibility of his turnovers to win against the 5th ranked defense in the league.
    jnday likes this.

Share This Page