1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Senate GOP leader: Party must explain core values

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by WoodysGirl, Jan 29, 2009.

  1. WoodysGirl

    WoodysGirl Shut up and play! Staff Member

    67,119 Messages
    6,906 Likes Received
    By Liz Sidoti, Associated Press Writer – 6 mins ago

    WASHINGTON – After crushing defeats in back-to-back elections, the top Senate Republican warned Thursday that the GOP risks remaining out of power in the White House and Congress unless it better explains its core principles to woo one-time faithful and new loyalists.

    "The results of the two recent elections are real, and so are the obstacles we face as a party," Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told the Republican National Committee on Thursday. "My concern is that unless we do something to adapt, our status as a minority party may become too pronounced for an easy recovery."

    "The situation is challenging, but it's far from irreversible," McConnell added, a dash of optimism in an otherwise stark assessment of where the Republican Party went wrong as he provided a road map for how it can right itself.

    He spoke to Republicans gathered in Washington to choose the next national chairman; five candidates are trying to unseat former President George W. Bush's hand-picked RNC chairman, Mike Duncan of Kentucky. The vote is Friday.

    Implicit in McConnell's message was the concern that the Republican Party under Bush strayed from its beliefs, resulting in drubbings in two straight elections.

    While McConnell praised Bush as a man of principle, he said: "We can all agree, sad as it is, that he wasn't winning any popularity contests. And history shows that unpopular presidents are usually a drag on everybody else who wears their political label."

    McConnell called for the GOP to embrace its conservative principles — and resist diluting its message — to bring people back and attract new rank-and-file. Still, he added: "It's clear our message isn't getting out to nearly as many people as it should ... Too often we've let others define us. And the image they've painted isn't very pretty."

    He acknowledged GOP fears that certain demographics from certain regions have shunned the party. And, he warned: "In politics, there's a name for a regional party: it's called a minority party."

    Just eight years after Republicans controlled the White House and Congress, the GOP finds itself out of power and trying to figure out how to rebound while its foe has grown much stronger. The Democratic Party is empowered by a broadened coalition of voters — including Hispanics and young voters — who swung behind President Barack Obama's call for change.

    Meanwhile, Bush left the White House with very low job approval ratings, Republicans saw their ranks in Congress grow even smaller and the party finds itself without a standard-bearer. Perhaps even more damaging to the GOP, the slice of the country that calls itself Republican has shrunk over the past few years as Obama and his Democrats attracted voters of all political stripes.

    Among those challenging Duncan for party chairman are: former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, South Carolina GOP chairman Katon Dawson, Michigan GOP chairman Saul Anuzis and former Tennessee GOP chairman Chip Saltsman. They have spent the past few months arguing that Duncan simply represents a continuation of Bush.

    Republicans say it's all but certain no one will get a majority on the first ballot when the 168-member RNC votes. Republicans say Duncan leads in endorsements for a second two-year term, with Steele, Dawson and Anuzis in competitive positions, while Blackwell trails. Saltsman is by far the longest shot, Republicans say.

    Still, with at least two rounds of balloting expected, it's possible anyone could end up with a majority.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090129/ap_on_el_ge/republicans
  2. trickblue

    trickblue Old Testament... Zone Supporter

    28,937 Messages
    356 Likes Received
    The GOP must go back to their core values... not just define them...

    Eight years of frivolous spending and abandoning those very core values has cost them power. Maybe they'll get the message this time...
  3. MetalHead

    MetalHead Benched

    6,031 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Gave us Uhbama.
  4. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    44,029 Messages
    1,125 Likes Received
    Spending as a % of GDP was actually very low during Bush.
  5. trickblue

    trickblue Old Testament... Zone Supporter

    28,937 Messages
    356 Likes Received
    While the ratio may have been low, it was certainly not indicative of the conservative philosophy they claim to espouse...
  6. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    44,029 Messages
    1,125 Likes Received
    Why not? There's no other logical way to look at government spending except in terms of % of GDP.
  7. trickblue

    trickblue Old Testament... Zone Supporter

    28,937 Messages
    356 Likes Received
    Of course there is...

    Putting money away for a rainy day is a start... paying off debt... another...

    Do you have anything against saving money?
  8. Kangaroo

    Kangaroo Active Member

    9,893 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Preach it

    Yep I felt like the party abandoned what got them in office that is why I thought we be in trouble if McCain got elected as well not nearly as bad as the current President but let's say I had little faith in McCain
  9. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    44,029 Messages
    1,125 Likes Received
    It's politically impossible to consistently run surpluses (and undesirable). The next best thing is to have tiny deficits, which is what Bush was doing.

    The idea that government spending was rampant during the Bush years is just wrong. I've posted the numbers here before -- most people's reaction is, "huh, I didn't know that."
  10. ScipioCowboy

    ScipioCowboy More than meets the eye. Zone Supporter

    15,250 Messages
    2,450 Likes Received
    Can we at least balance the budget? As I recall, we had a considerable amount of success in the 1990s by balancing the budget.
  11. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    44,029 Messages
    1,125 Likes Received
    You could balance it, but I don't see any need to. Small deficits are fine.
  12. trickblue

    trickblue Old Testament... Zone Supporter

    28,937 Messages
    356 Likes Received
    We don't have a small deficit...
  13. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    44,029 Messages
    1,125 Likes Received
    Not this year. Under Bush it was.
  14. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    41,784 Messages
    1,666 Likes Received
    It was the republican congress, mainly under Newt's leadership, that made a balanced budget possible and the surpluses that came for a while. But once he was run out and the so called moderates took over it was all downhill after that. Hastert and Fritz were total disasters as so called leaders.
    And Bush was never really a fiscal conservative ever.

Share This Page