Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by MaineBoy, Oct 30, 2012.
Please don't pretend that you know me, it's embarrassing for both of us.
It's called playing your percentages. Look it up. It's a simple concept.
Haven't seen this much passive aggression since my last girlfriend but glad you're "with me". :laugh2:
Thanks for making my point. 1 on 1 coverage is playing the percentage. That is what you look for in the game of football. It's called match ups. We had rushed for 15 yards all game. Again playing the percentages. Get a clue!!!
I really don't believe that about Witten I was just trying to point out by his logic we can't trust anyone because of the inconsistency on offense.
Long pass to a 3rd receiver who hasn't caught a ball on 3rd and 1 is playing high percentages? I wish I can play poker with you. I think it's you who need to get a clue.
If you played poker with him you would have to give him some gas money to get home....
given that tree has not been producing I cannot understand why they even considered throwing to him on that critical play...
To be fair, that exact throw put us into field goal range against the Ravens when he was interfered with.
That said, I feel like Romo threw a catchable ball into tight coverage. Our WRs get paid NFL money to be NFL professional receivers and frankly do not play like it. Every week this season the WR core has been responsible for some major issue.
i wouldn't have thrown to him anyway...