1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Spreadsheet of most effective drafters (teams) or: Why I miss Parcells

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by superpunk, Jan 29, 2013.

  1. superpunk

    superpunk Benched

    26,328 Messages
    73 Likes Received
    [IMG]

    http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Whos-been-doing-the-best-job-of-drafting.html

    There are some problems with methodology I think (bad teams are more prone to start young players) but it's pretty decent. The dropoff from when we lost the Tuna's guiding hand to the Wason Pharrett garbage we've seen recently really just jumps off the page. Who was the last pro-bowler we drafted? Mike Jenkins? lawd have mercy
  2. Erik_H

    Erik_H Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun. Zone Supporter

    2,443 Messages
    77 Likes Received
    Dez made the Pro bowl, but had to pass due to injury (as per Nick Eatman via the lunch break). But that's really besides the point since the pro bowl has become less and less about talent and more about which player ESPN chooses to over hype.

    Overall I think our drafting has improved significantly the last 2 years, so we may have what you were missing back (to a degree). It was the 2009 draft that haunts us and will do so for years. That was a disaster piled on top of a disaster.

    That said, Parcells made his mistakes too. Getting all excited about drafting a son of a former player hurt us pretty bad. Especially when the alternative was Nick Mangold. (Yes, I am rueing).

    I do think that there is reason for hope due to our last 2 drafts.
  3. SWG9

    SWG9 Well-Known Member

    1,040 Messages
    182 Likes Received
    Interesting. Also of note: over the last five years, Dallas is 31st in number of starts from its draft classes, and 30th in % of players still in the league in 2012.
  4. theebs

    theebs Believe!!!!

    22,213 Messages
    1,270 Likes Received
    The good old days.

    Larry lace well says everything's cool now That we ditched that Yankees defense and have him offering his services to the jones family.

    Btw

    I got an email telling me a number of seats had opened up in the 100 and 200 levels and were available to buy as season tickets. Are people ditching there seats after the last two seasons?

    Ironic. The day parcells was hired I believe they sold something like 177 season ticket packages.

    Its cool, shanahan and coughlin don't know what they are doing anyway...
  5. Yakuza Rich

    Yakuza Rich Well-Known Member

    12,100 Messages
    1,123 Likes Received
    Very flawed logic here.

    Would I really care that the Chiefs are #1 in the last 5 years or how low the Giants ranked?

    No, not really.

    I'll put it this way. For the most part we've drafted at least 6 players a year outside of the 2009 season. We are 42-38 in the last 5 years (Parcells was fairly long gone after then).

    So, it's not like we have been a squad built heavily on FA and yet our record is above .500. That indicates to me that we are doing a decent job drafting the past 5 years. I would have to see all of the other teams' records the past 5 years to get a better comparison.

    It also doesn't include UDFA's, which Dallas has done quite well with over the years.






    YR
  6. Shinywalrus

    Shinywalrus Active Member

    1,740 Messages
    8 Likes Received
    Very interesting, but isn't the bigger story that 3 of the Super Bowl winning squads are in (or extremely close to...) the bottom 5 of the 5-year list and that the exception is only barely in the top half?

    The top squads on the right are not a who's who of excellent teams. They are a who's who of the worst teams in football and the Seahawks.

    Our biggest problem over the last 5 years in terms of this statistic has been drafting injured players who continued to have injury issues. I don't think we can conclude that post-Parcells has been a disaster from these data.
  7. Angus12

    Angus12 Active Member

    123 Messages
    71 Likes Received
    Like all stats, which are fun to look at, but are for the most part worthless, so is this. Or should we take this seriously with the Chiefs, Dolphins, Cardinals, and Browns leading the way...? We've drafted far better in the last few years. Give it time to come to fruition.
  8. jobberone

    jobberone Genetically engineered moderating Orangutan Staff Member

    37,517 Messages
    3,819 Likes Received
    For me you have to look at each draft three and four years down the road.
  9. dogberry

    dogberry Well-Known Member

    2,416 Messages
    54 Likes Received
    theebs do fans purchasing 100s and 200s have to pick up the remainder of the seat licenses? Or did those seats not require a license? thanks
  10. theebs

    theebs Believe!!!!

    22,213 Messages
    1,270 Likes Received
    Not sure.

    Can't imagine you don't have to buy the psl. It's mandatory.
  11. jimnabby

    jimnabby Well-Known Member

    3,824 Messages
    663 Likes Received
    Parcells was responsible for the horrendous '04 and '06 drafts, don't forget.

    The 5 year ranking is killed by the disastrous '09 draft and some slow development & injuries (Dez, Lee, Carter in particular) that limited starts and potential Pro Bowls. It will be interesting to see the five year ranking two years from now. In the best case, we'll have a boatload of Pro Bowls from Dez, Lee, Carter, Smith & Claiborne. In the worst case, the injuries never go away for Lee & Carter, Smith & Claiborne don't develop the way we hope, and Dez doesn't put his knucklehead days behind him the way he seems to be doing.
  12. superpunk

    superpunk Benched

    26,328 Messages
    73 Likes Received
    hooray
  13. Yakuza Rich

    Yakuza Rich Well-Known Member

    12,100 Messages
    1,123 Likes Received
    All stats are not worthless.

    Just the 'bad' stats that are ill conceived, illogical and incomplete like this one.

    The problem with this metric is if I were to run a regression analysis on it, I would be willing to bet that the correlation coefficient would be 0 (meaning: no correlation) or perhaps a negative number (meaning: indirect correlation)

    If we went purely on that math, we would conclude that either drafting has no correlation to a team's success or an indirect correlation to a team's success (meaning, the worst you draft the better you do).

    Does anybody believe that?

    Of course not.

    Unfortunately, people like yourself conclude that stats are worthless when in reality it's about somebody coming up with a ludicrous way of determing draft classes and never really checking out what they are saying and that gets lumped in with stats that tell a very accurate picture of what is really going on.

    This is great for the fans of hating Jerry because they erroneously think this proves something when it doesn't.

    It would have been nice if the creator of this chart had just taken a glance at how the worst teams do better on this chart and come up with a different way to view the draft. Let's say you are the Pats and you have Rob Gronkowski as your TE, you still need a #2 and #3 TE because those are important parts on the roster. But, your #2 (Hernandez) will not play nearly as much unless Gronkowski gets hurt. So if Gronkowski never got hurt, the Patriots look like idiots for drafting Hernandez because he can't start over Gronkowski and likely won't make the Pro Bowl either.







    YR
  14. Eddie

    Eddie Well-Known Member

    8,808 Messages
    377 Likes Received
    I disagree. While I can see Dez making a few Pro Bowls, none of the other fore-mentioned players will sniff the Pro Bowl.

    Lee and Carter don't even have a full season of starts if you add their starts together. Mo will be a good CB, but there are plenty better.
  15. superpunk

    superpunk Benched

    26,328 Messages
    73 Likes Received
    Or it indicates that the core we built 5 years ago is carrying the crap we've built since then.

    The article wasn't arguing for a correlation anyway so idk what you're carrying on about. For this the easiest thing to conclude for Dallas is that something changed 5 years ago in our drafting way way way for the worse.
  16. theebs

    theebs Believe!!!!

    22,213 Messages
    1,270 Likes Received
    06 wasn't terrible.

    especially when u throw in Austin, Bowen, Hurd.
  17. Angus12

    Angus12 Active Member

    123 Messages
    71 Likes Received
    Guess you missed where I said "For the most part". Stats can be twisted to tell whatever story it is you want to portray. Good and bad.
  18. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    43,933 Messages
    997 Likes Received
    I wonder if we get credit for Roy Williams' starts. I bet not. While, ultimately, that trade does not appear worthwhile, if we had drafted some other equally worthless players that played 40 games for us and then were cut, we'd still be getting credit for those players.

    Similar problem for Lee and Carter. I doubt anyone would not want us to have drafted those guys knowing what we know now. But they count as bad picks due to this system.

    In other words, flawed system is flawed.
  19. superpunk

    superpunk Benched

    26,328 Messages
    73 Likes Received
    At best I'd give us 20% credit there.

    Only because you are wishing it would measure something that it never pretends to. Should Bob Griffin 3's starts count three times? That's silly and opens an outrageous, nearly-impossible to measure can of worms.
  20. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    43,933 Messages
    997 Likes Received
    PS, Parcells basically had one ridiculously good draft, and there's evidence that wasn't the result of Parcells (e.g., Jerry telling Parcells he was drafting Ware over Parcells' objection).

Share This Page