Spreadsheet of most effective drafters (teams) or: Why I miss Parcells

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by superpunk, Jan 29, 2013.

  1. Yakuza Rich

    Yakuza Rich Well-Known Member

    16,168 Messages
    7,219 Likes Received
    I said 'virtually nobody.' That's does not mean every one.

    If you happen to have the logic that we should do well in something that has a mathematic indirect correlation to winning in the NFL, so be it. At least we know where you stand.

  2. SWG9

    SWG9 Well-Known Member

    1,040 Messages
    182 Likes Received
    For the life of me I can't understand your thinking on this.

    If I were to create a similar chart with UDFA's, Dallas would likely be tops on the list or very high.

    If I were to run a similar analysis on that chart, it would likely show no correlation or a negative correlation between winning and losing.

    By your logic, that would mean that Dallas either did poorly with UDFA's, or that UDFA's don't matter at all.

    Both of those statements are clearly false.
  3. Idgit

    Idgit That sounds really boring Staff Member

    45,249 Messages
    29,767 Likes Received
    It would mean that doing well in terms of starts by UDFA doesn't result in more winning, and so is not a very useful measure of how an organization is run. I think that's pretty cut and dry.
  4. Trajan

    Trajan Active Member

    693 Messages
    69 Likes Received
    Actually, it could be a good indicator of how poorly an organization is run.
  5. SWG9

    SWG9 Well-Known Member

    1,040 Messages
    182 Likes Received
    So Dallas's success in acquiring UDFA's is meaningless and not a credit to the organization?
  6. Kristen82

    Kristen82 Benched

    965 Messages
    221 Likes Received
    Seriously, where would DAL's O be without Austin and Romo?

Share This Page