1. Are you a gamer? Come join us at GameNotOver.com
    If you are a gamer, then GameNotOver is your new home! Whether you are a PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, mobile or web gamer, you will find other gamers to talk with on GameNotOver where you can get help, share reviews of the latest games and gaming technology or even wax nostalgic over the gaming days of old. Come join us and help us grow GameNotOver into a wonderful community for gamers!
    Dismiss Notice

Tannehill injured

Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by jnday, Jan 13, 2012.

  1. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    8,622 Messages
    3,171 Likes Received
    Just saw on ESPN that Ryan Tannehill has broke his foot. Do you think his draft stock will go down ?
     
  2. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    87,963 Messages
    10,914 Likes Received
    Yes. I think it will drop.
     
  3. burntricersx

    burntricersx Member

    506 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Probably but not enough for us to want to draft him in round 2...
     
  4. elcocinero

    elcocinero Member

    482 Messages
    4 Likes Received
    I dont want to draft a QB in the first two rounds. We need two immediate starters out of our first two picks. QB in the 3rd would be ok if the value is there.
     
  5. TheCount

    TheCount Pixel Pusher

    23,164 Messages
    3,817 Likes Received
    Agreed, unless it's an unbelieveable value like RG3 is there at 14 somehow. We need starters, not backups. Least of all backups to players that aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
     
  6. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    8,622 Messages
    3,171 Likes Received
    I wouldn't have a problem with Tannehill in the second . He would be good value there . QB is not a position that I would consider a must .
     
  7. Gaede

    Gaede Well-Known Member

    10,632 Messages
    3,408 Likes Received
    We should be looking at QB in the next couple drafts...If Tannehill was around at our pick in the second, we'd definitely have to think about it...Not sure though if this is the year to spend a high pick on a QB, considering how many problems need fixing.

    It'd probably be smarter sign a FA to backup Romo this year and look for a developmental QB in rounds 3-7 to replace McGee.
     
  8. Deep_Freeze

    Deep_Freeze Well-Known Member

    7,449 Messages
    905 Likes Received
    And yet we still took Carter last year when we needed two starters out of the first two picks.

    Just never know with Jerry, depends on how we rate Tannehill.

    Since he is injuried, that might have actually moved him up Jerry's board instead of down....:cool:
     
  9. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    8,622 Messages
    3,171 Likes Received
    One good leg , second round ? Yeah , Tannehill is the second round pick .:laugh2:
     
  10. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    87,963 Messages
    10,914 Likes Received
    I agree. Maybe next year we look to draft a QB that we feel can be groomed behind Romo but right now I think Dallas has to address things like defense and more talent on the OL.
     
  11. unionjack8

    unionjack8 Well-Known Member

    4,392 Messages
    1,909 Likes Received
    he will still go in round one.

    Not because of immense talent but because thr value of a QB is so valued in the game today(see Locker, Ponder 2011).

    He's the 3rd qb and of that there's little debate. He's gone before #25 imo
     
  12. tm1119

    tm1119 Well-Known Member

    4,828 Messages
    1,886 Likes Received
    Id be willing to take a chance on Tannehill in the 3rd....as a WR. Not at all impressed with him as a QB. He only completed 61% of his passes and averaged 7.1 yards per completion. That along with his 16 INTS does not say 1st round QB. I understand hes still extremely raw at the position and teams are enamored with his athletic ability, but hes a HUGE risk for a 1st round pick. Couldnt imagine a team taking him in the 1st round banking on him being their franchise QB, just too much of a project.
     

Share This Page