The decline of the fantasy RB

Discussion in 'Fantasy Sports Zone' started by Dodger, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. Dodger

    Dodger Indomitable

    4,216 Messages
    43 Likes Received
    An excellent article that questions the value of the RB first approach in fantasy football.

    Position Primer: Running Back
    [​IMG] By Brad Evans, Yahoo! Sports Aug 19, 8:39 pm EDT

    For years the signs of decline at running back were obvious. Increases in platoons, catastrophic injuries and air-happy offensive trends all played a significant role in the position’s deterioration. As a result, owners often accrued massive post-draft debt, sometimes defaulting on their championship dreams.

    Within the ‘expert’ community, the downturn created a schism. Running theorists continued to stick to their guns by imploring the masses to follow the traditional RB-RB-RB method. Conversely, mixologists preached diversification, a must when constructing a competitive team. After all, the failure rate at RB – defined as rushers drafted in the top 12 that didn’t finish inside the top 15 – was significantly higher than other positions. Over the past five years, 46.7 percent of RB1s have bombed compared to 26.3 percent of WR1s and 38.3 percent for QBs (Note: Only five percent for top 4 QBs drafted).

    It appears the Sir Mix-a-Lots were mostly right.

    Read the rest here.

Share This Page