Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by Nirvana, Jan 16, 2014.
Everyone in Dallas gets pizza and a trophy no matter what the record is. Look at that scouting team.
Yep. He has always been my least favorite of the Cowboy writers. I'd rather read Mickey.
So we have a "LAME COACH" who is a "lame duck"????
If my company didn't have random drug test, I would love to try whatever Watkins is smoking.
Does this reply have a record number of likes? If not it should. Lol.
I don't know that Parcell's got an extension, but for some reason I recall him getting some fresh money. So maybe he got a 1-yr deal
It's not stupid...when the person suggesting it's stupid is missing the point. But continuing to harp on that point after I've clarified in other posts would be stupid.
I just checked and yes he was entering the 3rd year of his 4 year deal. But the overriding point was how he entered the season on the hot seat, because of the lack of success by the team.
i guess jerry did say it
yeah, comparing the coaching resumes of ron rivera to garrett the clown is beyond ridiculous
and so it begins....
excuse #1 for garrett groupies:
how can you expect the players to listen to him, he was a lame duck coach and never given the chance to succeed because of jerry.
Yeah, it would be stupid to compare the resumes of the two coaches if that's what I was doing..
WG, i dont think i have had a problem with anything you have said
You were responding to a post that had quoted me as suggesting that the two coaches resumes were equal. I was simply pointing out, to you, if no one else, that nobody in this thread actually made that point.
Sometimes things get lost when people scan a post and then attempt to make a snarky post.
That's what I'm wondering.....you got a few thinking it's a good idea to keep this guy even if we do decent this year.....
no thank you
This has shades of Clint Murchinson/Gil Brandt re-upping Tom Landry early in his coaching career, when a lot were calling for his coaching "head"..........I believe they gave him a new 10 year contract in the face of his detractors...........the rest is history.
Don't see much of Tom Landry in Jason Garrett............Landry was innovative in so many ways, he adapted his system to the strengths of his players.........Garrett is the opposite-in almost refusing to use bunch sets, quasi pik routes, motion, play action to any great extent to help his scheme.
i did a podcast on this subject:
Who cares of Rivera was on the hot seat? He improved both years, meaning turning the team around. His being on the hot seat was unjustified if we are actually talking progress, while Garrett's was justified.
maybe by telling jones he should extend garrett will make jones do the opposite ?