You said it right there in your own post he was not the focus for the offense nNow is it my turn to put a bunch of LOL LMAO Rotfl Etc does that make this post much more credible? Does that mean I got some over you haha LOL LMAO how about whatever?
You said Ingram was hitting the wall and washed up. here are you own words.
"Mark Ingram ism is a prime example of what talking about .Here's a guy that has slowed down considerably and he's bouncing around now. How many yards did Ingram get last year? 15 games barely over a thousand yards he's 30 years old he's hitting the wall "
And not a shred of it was true. Ingram had probably his best season as a pro. 5 yards a carry and over 1000 yards on 200 carries. 15 total touchdowns.
No runningback is the focal point of any team's offense these days, except for maybe in a few places in the NFL. But, you didn't say "he's not the focus" you said "he's slowed down considerably, bouncing around now, hitting the wall" and that was all demonstrably false and now you don't want to own up to making a mistake, heh.
MY post wasn't credible? Your post was an outright lie, and i even linked to stats to prove it. But yet i'm the one not credible. OK.
This board is something else, i tell you what