Go watch the welcome to training camp pc 2008. Then get back to me on how they didnt attack wade phillips.
Go watch the questions Ware, Newman, Romo, Jones etc were asked in that time period face to face. Then get back to me.
I gave you specific examples, Calvin Watkins Got up out of his chair at valley ranch and was arguing with Wade phillips in the summer of 09 and told Wade frigging phillips he could have coached the cowboys to the playoffs in 2008. It ended up getting him moved around at the DMN at the time.
Steve Dennis used to call Romo ...Tony Oh No.....he would ask other players on the team in the open locker room period if Calling romo tony oh no was accurate.
No idea where you get this notion that these guys didn't bring that stuff into the locker room/valley ranch and ask directly. They did all the time.
The new york post sent a Jessica Simpson look a like to the cowboys giants playoff game and they all covered it like it was important?
I am done for the day with this topic. If you were a fan of the team then and followed them closely you will see a stark difference in how they are covered and the standard they were held to.
lol - training camp 2008? Again, even assuming you are right about the "attack" on Phillips, you are still talking about an incident 12 years ago, and not the normal conduct of reporters in a press conference, and, again, by your own admission, not how things are done currently. You acted as if Dak gets treated with kid gloves and then admitted that no player gets treated that way today, so you are still contradicting yourself and providing support for what I said.
As for these other decade old or more examples, even though they don't support your point anyway, if you have evidence, bring it on. Simply saying another person should look up a press conferences from 10-12 years ago is a cop out. If it's easy to find, you do it. It's your point, so it's your responsibility to support it.
Asking is one thing. And I've addressed that. And, in fact, Dak obviously was asked about his contract situation, which is why he commented on it several times. But you weren't talking about asking, you were suggesting someone should have attacked him and brought "venom" (again, your word).
And a locker room is very different than a public situation like a press conference. I never said there weren't jabs in the confines of a locker room - to suggest I did was a fabrication on your part. Anyone that has ever spent time in a locker room knows things are different there than in public
Ultimately, you are still talking about instances over a decade ago, you still haven't show any evidence of the consistent "venom" and full on attacks you suggest were routine in press conferences back then, and you admitted yourself that not attacking Dak was consistent with how things are done today and not just the media treating Dak differently as you claimed.