Worst case

Killerinstinct

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,916
Reaction score
5,721
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?
 

mardwin

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,815
Reaction score
9,790
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?

Slater is the pick.
 

DBOY3141

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
5,955
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?
If I can't trade down...I take Slater. Who knows if the back issue thing is legit...I'm sure the Cowboys would.
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
19,779
Reaction score
16,022
Hope someone like NE wants to move up for Lance, if not I am drafting Parsons.

He has the most upside on the defensive side of the ball after the CBs.
 

JD_KaPow

jimnabby
Messages
11,035
Reaction score
10,803
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?
I run to the podium to hand in the card for Pitts. This is best case, not worst case.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
18,951
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?
Heard teams are fine with Slater’s medical
 

Bigdog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,704
Reaction score
11,354
This is what scares me. I am hearing that Carolina could be looking at CBs since their secondary was one of the worst in league last year according some of the experts. Now that they have their QB it they could go that way which would really throw a wrench in our plans.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,302
Reaction score
6,760
Slater or trade with a team that covets Trey Lance. The OL is the engine that makes the offense go.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
Slater for sure. The back stuff came back fine, after all.

If we don't like him, try to trade to 15-20 and go Moehrig
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,115
Reaction score
8,807
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?

If it falls this way (unlikely since Denver just traded for Bridgewater, so they probably don't move up to 4)...Pitts is the pick. Dallas wouldn't even use a quarter of their alotted time before handing in that pick.

Edit: just saw the correction post.
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,924
Reaction score
17,685
I’d want to take DeVonte Smith because 1, he’s a fantastic player and 2, I’d want to watch Timb2 freak out and jump off the ledge.

I would love to take Smith too. That guy just gets open. I don't think the NFL level players are going to change that either. The only negative is his size, but in his case I don't think it will hurt him. But to take Smith I would have to be willing to get rid of one of my receivers and that would probably be Gallup. The only problem with this is that would leave the Cowboys with 3 WRs on the field who are not exactly physical.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,326
Reaction score
43,954
I would love to take Smith too. That guy just gets open. I don't think the NFL level players are going to change that either. The only negative is his size, but in his case I don't think it will hurt him. But to take Smith I would have to be willing to get rid of one of my receivers and that would probably be Gallup. The only problem with this is that would leave the Cowboys with 3 WRs on the field who are not exactly physical.
Yeah, he’d be Gallup’s replacement.

Really I was half kidding just messing with Timb2. However, I do think Smith is going to be really, really good and I don’t think his size will hurt him at all. He does everything very well and he absolutely slaughtered the highest level of college ball at that size.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,961
Reaction score
9,138
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4.Denver/Atl trade Den takes fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
7. Waddle
8.Car takes Horn
9. Atl takes surtain
10.

Slater was an opt out and I am hearing med evals revealed back issues
Parsons opt out and character issues

Who do we take?

If you're telling me I can choose between Pitts and Slater I'd argue this is closer to best case scenario than worst case scenario. Have heard no legitimate concerns around health issues for Slater.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,326
Reaction score
43,954
If you're telling me I can choose between Pitts and Slater I'd argue this is closer to best case scenario than worst case scenario. Have heard no legitimate concerns around health issues for Slater.
He forgot to put in Pitts. He said take out Waddle and put Pitts in Miami.
 
Top