What Tony Pollard’s Numbers Make Clear

Silver N Blue

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,287
Reaction score
8,801
FIRST OF ALL, LET ME SAY THIS OVER THE LOUD SPEAKER: ATTENTION ALL ZEKE SUPER FANS- THIS IS NOT AN ANTI-ZEKE THREAD. THANK YOU.

One of the bright spots that has clearly emerged this season is the development of Tony Pollard into a bonafide offensive weapon. So much so he can no longer just be a “rest opportunity” for Zeke. Pollard has shown that he can be a real asset in multiple situations.

I will go a step further: Tony Pollard is now a weapon that must be a part of every game plan.

Am I saying Zeke is not necessary? Absolutely NOT. Zeke is still a valuable offensive weapon too. Two things have changed. 1. Pollard has developed into a potential big play back. 2. Zeke is not what he was in 2016-18. He still has value. But he is no longer the “bell cow” 25 carries per game back, and he does not seem to have the burst to a big play he once did. Zeke still has value though in several areas including power runs, blocking and some passing routes.

It’s also clear Kellen Moore is recognizing Pollard’s increased value. Compare game one to game to game two regarding Pollard’s work load:
  • Game 1 vs TB- 7 touches. 3 rushes for 14 yards, 4 catches for 29 yards. 43 total yds
  • Game 2 vs LAC- 16 touches- 13 carries for 109 yds, 3 catches for 31 yds. 140 total yds.
Some of the numbers will vary depending on who we play. TB was certainly better than LAC against the run.

Looking at comparisons between Zeke and Pollard and explosive plays of 20 yds plus the last two years, the numbers speak for themselves.
  • Ezekiel Elliott - Number of plays of 20 yds+
    • 2016-2018- 30 plays of 20+ yds
    • 2019-20- 3 plays of 20+ yds
    • Notice the drop off after 2018.
  • Tony Pollard - Number of plays of 20 yds+
    • 2019-20- 8 plays of 20+ yds
    • 2021- already has 2 plays of 20+ yds
    • Last two years, Pollard has 10 plays of 20+ compared to 3 for Zeke.
Once again, not saying Zeke is no good or shouldn’t play. Just saying Pollard is more of a big play threat and needs to get more touches per game. The numbers are clear.
What ever it takes to win and if Amari is out he will be on the field even more IMO. I will say Zeke still has speed as the guy keeping pace with Lamb Sunday before the half he just doesn’t have the explosive burst you alluded to. Nothing wrong with a good one two punch.
 

Cowpolk

Landry Hat
Messages
18,849
Reaction score
28,791
Difference is Pollard actually has talent and has been successful without Zeke, and on early downs. Hambrick was an over hyped 3rd down back who used obvious passing situations to inflate his avg.
Pollard is a career backup Zeke is a career starter and his yardage is coming the same way Hambrick did it in spurts Do not know why anyone would want to get rid of either If you have 2 good running backs you play them.
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,118
Reaction score
14,024
One of the bright spots that has clearly emerged this season is the development of Tony Pollard into a bonafide offensive weapon. So much so he can no longer just be a “rest opportunity” for Zeke. Pollard has shown that he can be a real asset in multiple situations.

It’s also clear Kellen Moore is recognizing Pollard’s increased value. Compare game one to game to game two regarding Pollard’s work load:

Once again, not saying Zeke is no good or shouldn’t play. Just saying Pollard is more of a big play threat and needs to get more touches per game. The numbers are clear.

Here's a million dollar question ... what took Kellen Moore so freakin' long to finally start utilizing Pollard into the
offense such as this yea.. !!??

Hes' been here 3 years and only just now making him a true exploited weapon in this offense, more than just 2-3 touches per game. I think in one game in 2019, Pollard did not even get a single carry.
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,362
Reaction score
13,725
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The fact is when Pollard is running well they must keep feeding him. Can't remember which game last year when pollard broke off 40 yards and then never got another handoff the rest of the game. That just can not happen.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
16,501
Reaction score
63,090
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I did not say it was anti zeke, I agree with Church it is a different animal when you become top dog #1. You post 2 games and really 1 game that either back did much of anything. I hope Pollard to continues to make plays so believe me I am not anti Pollard but I also know the NFL season is a long one and 1 game does not make the season
No worries- I didn’t think you weren’t bashing Pollard. And I agree - as I stated in the OP. It’s not that Pollard needs to “take over”. It’s just that he needs to be featured every week. His numbers show he’s more explosive. But he can’t handle the job full time.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
No worries- I didn’t think you weren’t bashing Pollard. And I agree - as I stated in the OP. It’s not that Pollard needs to “take over”. It’s just that he needs to be featured every week. His numbers show he’s more explosive. But he can’t handle the job full time.

As a fan I want to see him and others continue to produce. My entire focus is this team winning, not who is paid what and not who starts it is simple, I expect guys to go out and produce when their number is called. Pollard clearly is a guy who can go out and make plays and I hope to see many more from him as the season moves on.
 

MonsterD

Quota outta absentia
Messages
7,894
Reaction score
5,451
Problem as has been pointed out by many is that the coaching staff can't conceive anything more than a "bellcow" RB that takes the load. It is way way too complicated for them to envision a RBBC group each feeding off each other and having overlapping skills.

I am not too optimistic they keep using Pollard he probably goes back to 2 or 3 carries a game. And Pollard should be used in RBBC with some other backs, Elliott should not be the receiver type to be in open space and create like Pollard can.

It is painfully obvious now Pollard is a poor man's McCaffrey and should be featured along with Elliott at the same time as a receiver, not only screens but more on routes too, but again they won't do it.

If you look at what is happening in NFL, more and more NFL teams are using a "running" WR like the Packers did a long time ago with Ty Montgomery.
I think they tried it with Tavon Austin, but he was not any good so they forced passing short to Elliott and he still gets them today.
 

Vegas_Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,151
Reaction score
7,344
I think we can use both but Pollard deserves more touches than Zeke at this point.
 

stiletto

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,003
Reaction score
12,941
Whatever the case, put me in the "Do NOT pay any RB's big money" Fan Club. Keep drafting stud OLinemen and let fresh RB's come in around the 4th/5th round. Let them get that big $ contract somewhere else. Just my opinion. No more Zeke's. I'd be against paying Pollard too...
 

pete026

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,158
Here's a million dollar question ... what took Kellen Moore so freakin' long to finally start utilizing Pollard into the
offense such as this yea.. !!??

Hes' been here 3 years and only just now making him a true exploited weapon in this offense, more than just 2-3 touches per game. I think in one game in 2019, Pollard did not even get a single carry.
I understand the point but one of those years we basically didn't have an offensive line or QB so outside of this year, the only other year was 2019. 2020 was pretty much a lost cause in experimenting with the offense.
 

Praxit

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,663
Reaction score
12,647
..wow, interesting tidbit Bullet. Reading through your post and seeing the stats, how the comparison is getting wider. Its a good thing for us.

At same time, couldn't help to wonder what happened to Zeke? Adding the fact he's 26 yrs old. I thought RB's could still push late 20's and by then losing a step or two is common.
 
Top