CFZ Might be smarter to fill most critical roster voids via trade

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
3,733
Googled, Risner

Okay. Well-taken. Went back in my browser history, and here's a couple of things my searches had uncovered that evidently required some other keywords...

2022-05-13_15-08-56.png


2022-05-13_15-09-54.png



2022-05-13_15-10-45.png
 

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
3,733
Doh... and this one...

LWR_Recording.png



And.

Now that Landry is evidently signing in New Orleans, it's almost certainly going to raise the volume on them fielding offers for Tre'Quan Smith, who they signed earlier in the off-season.
 

exciter

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,543
Reaction score
3,428
The logic is this.

On the O-line, whatever decent-enough talent might be left in free agency to serve as the default if the 21 year-old fails to win confidence... they're probably more keen on finding a team that didn't just draft a FRP at their position. So, assuming there was anyone there you'd like, you're probably going to have to overpay to compensate for the fact that they probably have better options in terms of playing time.

In the WR corps, it's not very different, except instead of a FRP, you've got a guy who just signed a significant contract who is anticipated to be back at some point. And given the enthusiasm for the 3rd round guy who they almost took in the 2nd round, there likely are better options for a credible free agent receiver (... and again, like O-line, not that there's that many left to pick from anyhow).

Finally, among the LBs, it's not even clear that there would be any real chance to start, so LBs with that ambition (ie, who are actually potential impact players there) probably will have some allergy to signing up with Big D.

So, I'm one of those persuaded now that you watch the trade block for some decent opportunities instead of free agency. Some names are beginning to be floated among team bloggers/reporters as vulnerable as a consequence of their teams' higher draft picks.

Some early candidates on the O-line specifically include Dalton Risner (OG, Broncos) and Denzelle Good (OG/OT Raiders).
Hmmm… they just traded a top #1 WR for a fringe 3rd string developmental Tackle…. Maybe leave trading to the teams that are capable of doing so!
 

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
3,733
Hmmm… they just traded a top #1 WR for a fringe 3rd string developmental Tackle…. Maybe leave trading to the teams that are capable of doing so!

Gets tedious to have that trade misrepresented as-if salary wasn't an issue, and my Spidey sense would add, as-if attitude wasn't an issue. Don't read that as me having a problem with his attitude, but the easy interpretation is that Jerry felt the vax thing was too emblematic of a team-second attitude, and from that moment on, Amari was probably marked for being dispatched. And look, the market was the market for a guy with that production at that salary. Self-interest is self-interest. Not rational to say they took the worst offer they could get. Only rational that they took the best offer. Perhaps their timing sucked, I don't pretend to know what I cannot possibly know w/o the help of hidden mics and cameras.

If anything, this team is rightly chided for not being somewhat more inclined to make trades than they have been.
 

exciter

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,543
Reaction score
3,428
I
Gets tedious to have that trade misrepresented as-if salary wasn't an issue, and my Spidey sense would add, as-if attitude wasn't an issue. Don't read that as me having a problem with his attitude, but the easy interpretation is that Jerry felt the vax thing was too emblematic of a team-second attitude, and from that moment on, Amari was probably marked for being dispatched. And look, the market was the market for a guy with that production at that salary. Self-interest is self-interest. Not rational to say they took the worst offer they could get. Only rational that they took the best offer. Perhaps their timing sucked, I don't pretend to know what I cannot possibly know w/o the help of hidden mics and cameras.

If anything, this team is rightly chided for not being somewhat more inclined to make trades than they have been.
No way to sugar coat it… it was a dumb trade. If you look around the league at the value other teams got for comparable WRs it was a “basic reasoning skills of a potato” dumb trade. And that’s being nice!
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,345
Reaction score
34,469
The logic is this.

On the O-line, whatever decent-enough talent might be left in free agency to serve as the default if the 21 year-old fails to win confidence... they're probably more keen on finding a team that didn't just draft a FRP at their position. So, assuming there was anyone there you'd like, you're probably going to have to overpay to compensate for the fact that they probably have better options in terms of playing time.

In the WR corps, it's not very different, except instead of a FRP, you've got a guy who just signed a significant contract who is anticipated to be back at some point. And given the enthusiasm for the 3rd round guy who they almost took in the 2nd round, there likely are better options for a credible free agent receiver (... and again, like O-line, not that there's that many left to pick from anyhow).

Finally, among the LBs, it's not even clear that there would be any real chance to start, so LBs with that ambition (ie, who are actually potential impact players there) probably will have some allergy to signing up with Big D.

So, I'm one of those persuaded now that you watch the trade block for some decent opportunities instead of free agency. Some names are beginning to be floated among team bloggers/reporters as vulnerable as a consequence of their teams' higher draft picks.

Some early candidates on the O-line specifically include Dalton Risner (OG, Broncos) and Denzelle Good (OG/OT Raiders).

I think late preseason trades/acquisitions are one of the things the Joneses count on if they feel the team needs to pick up players. Stephen Jones has addressed it before.
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,291
Reaction score
13,657
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Trades aren't how Stephen operates and when he does trade it'll be for an unproven guy for a late pick. They also won't trade for a starting quality in a backup especially while they have a cheaper option already on the roster. This team is set barring injury.
 

Jake

Beyond tired of Jerry
Messages
36,067
Reaction score
84,350
The logic is this.

On the O-line, whatever decent-enough talent might be left in free agency to serve as the default if the 21 year-old fails to win confidence... they're probably more keen on finding a team that didn't just draft a FRP at their position. So, assuming there was anyone there you'd like, you're probably going to have to overpay to compensate for the fact that they probably have better options in terms of playing time.

In the WR corps, it's not very different, except instead of a FRP, you've got a guy who just signed a significant contract who is anticipated to be back at some point. And given the enthusiasm for the 3rd round guy who they almost took in the 2nd round, there likely are better options for a credible free agent receiver (... and again, like O-line, not that there's that many left to pick from anyhow).

Finally, among the LBs, it's not even clear that there would be any real chance to start, so LBs with that ambition (ie, who are actually potential impact players there) probably will have some allergy to signing up with Big D.

So, I'm one of those persuaded now that you watch the trade block for some decent opportunities instead of free agency. Some names are beginning to be floated among team bloggers/reporters as vulnerable as a consequence of their teams' higher draft picks.

Some early candidates on the O-line specifically include Dalton Risner (OG, Broncos) and Denzelle Good (OG/OT Raiders).

Sounds good, in theory, but then I remember who runs the Cowboys front office.
 
Top