They are all irrelevant.
They are all irrelevant.
They are all irrelevant.
I don't trust the standings so much midseasonI trust standings, not rankings.
You asked which one do you trust from all the rankings, and I trust the standings today more than I trust any of the rankings.I don't trust the standings so much midseason
-Vikes are not a 2 seed caliber team.
-Giants are not a playoff caliber team.
-49ers are much better than their record
You asked which one do you trust from all the rankings, and I trust the standings today more than I trust any of the rankings.
You are what you are. You may not be that at the end of the season, but for now, you are what you are and the standings reflect that.
Mic Drop!!So, following your logic (standings best reflect what you are)... you are on record saying:
-You'd rather face the Bucs than the Giants
and
-You'd rather face the Vikings than the 49ers
Vegas sure doesn't think the standings tell the real story.
All I want to know is how many NFC teams made the top five, in any of those rankings? Because we don't have to worry about the AFC teams until...the SB.NFL.com's Dan Hanzus
Dallas #3
PFF
Dallas #5
Football Outsiders
Dallas #2
Rich Eisen
Dallas #3
Walter Football
Dallas #5
Who do you trust? Whattya got?
8-3, 2nd place in the NFCE.NFL.com's Dan Hanzus
Dallas #3
PFF
Dallas #5
Football Outsiders
Dallas #2
Rich Eisen
Dallas #3
Walter Football
Dallas #5
Who do you trust? Whattya got?
Rankings are cool, coaches look at standings. At least in pro sports.