When Will Mo Officially Be A Bust?

[TwoDeep3]

We had so many 7th rounders and UDFA up until recently, with this team, I think thats proven out. Consider then thread you are posting in as Lawrence looks on from his walking boot. Romo to Austin was the first time as UDFA threw a TD to an UDFA. The Packers can build through the draft, the Cowboys have their own special work around.

So what seventh rounders would you have traded for Aikman? The risk is higher for the price paid, but to say quantity beats quality harkens back to the 2009 draft which destroys your argument.

 

[CCBoy]

This made me think of the sci-fi short story turned in to a novel titled "Flowers for Algernon." It later became a film called Charlie.

To join the other side you might need an operation. Unfortunately they sometimes don't take.

That was a tragedy and required a basis of love to be appreciated...but the published version was only about 99 pages.

 

[5Stars]

This made me think of the sci-fi short story turned in to a novel titled "Flowers for Algernon." It later became a film called Charlie.

To join the other side you might need an operation. Unfortunately they sometimes don't take.

lol I have no idea what this means, but I like it!

 

[Idgit]

'Bust' isn't a meaningful word, since there's no agreed-upon definition of what it is.

I only consider a player a bust when they're unable to play in the league. Beyond that, it's just a question of a player not meeting expectations. If you're getting meaningful snaps from a guy, you get meaningful snaps. If you don't get as many as you hoped or expected, it stinks, but it's not considered a bust. That's because for my part, I think of 'bust' as in 'busted' or 'bankrupted,' which implies bottoming out completely.

 

[TwoDeep3]

I believe in kids and dogs as well.

And I believe you never read this book while at the Academy.

 

[CCBoy]

Do you not feel the same about the trade up for Demarcus Lawrence?

lol I have no idea what this means, but I like it!

Charlie was a guy who was mentally challenged due to a brain condition. He had a brain operation, and quickly developed into a genius. The story ended when his operation reverted back to his previous condition, and he knew he was going back to his former state.

Flowers for Algernon was the title, and eilrahC, printed backwards, was the movie.

 

[TwoDeep3]

Charlie was a low IQ individual who underwent an operation which increased his IQ. The scientists who worked with Charlie found his IQ continued to climb until he - somewhat like Will Hunting in the film Good Will Hunting - became aggressive and irritated with people surrounding him who could not think at his advanced level.

But instead of Charlie chasing after a woman, his mind slid back into the depths of his low IQ and he became what he was before the operation.

Thus my point about you joining the realists...

 

[5Stars]

Charlie was a guy who was mentally challenged due to a brain condition. He had a brain operation, and quickly developed into a genius. The story ended when his operation reverted back to his previous condition, and he knew he was going back to his former state.

Flowers for Algernon was the title, and eilrahC, printed backwards, was the movie.

That is some scary ****! I don't want to see that movie.

 

[TwoDeep3]

That was a tragedy and required a basis of love to be appreciated...but the published version was only about 99 pages.

I believe the initial story was an allegory for the limits of science versus God.

 

[5Stars]

Charlie was a low IQ individual who underwent an operation which increased his IQ. The scientists who worked with Charlie found his IQ continued to climb until he - somewhat like Will Hunting in the film Good Will Hunting - became aggressive and irritated with people surrounding him who could not think at his advanced level.

But instead of Charlie chasing after a woman, his mind slid back into the depths of his low IQ and he became what he was before the operation.

Thus my point about you joining the realists...

So, are you saying I need an operation?

I am freaking out over here!

 

[CCBoy]

And I believe you never read this book while at the Academy.

Not at all, I attach an emotional value as well, which to yourself, unless it is streamlined to an emotion of negative attachment, is worthless.. and hence, to yourself, unintelligible. And stereotypes aren't anything more than priviledged seeking favor.

 

[windward]

If he's cut or doesn't get a second contract. I'm not going to use preseason games played as a measure of determine in whether a player is a bust or not. This season and possibly the next will be indicative of how his caree will play out with us.

 

[CCBoy]

I believe the initial story was an allegory for the limits of science versus God.

Or simply a tragedy of life...

 

[5Stars]

'Bust' isn't a meaningful word, since there's no agreed-upon definition of what it is.

I only consider a player a bust when they're unable to play in the league. Beyond that, it's just a question of a player not meeting expectations. If you're getting meaningful snaps from a guy, you get meaningful snaps. If you don't get as many as you hoped or expected, it stinks, but it's not considered a bust. That's because for my part, I think of 'bust' as in 'busted' or 'bankrupted,' which implies bottoming out completely.

Busted, disgusted and can't be trusted!

 

[TwoDeep3]

That is some scary ****! I don't want to see that movie.

Cliff Robertson played Charlie. He also played Kennedy in PT109. A favorite of mine at the time.

Columbia Pictures scandal
In 1977, Robertson discovered that his signature had been forged on a $10,000 check payable to him, although it was for work he had not performed. He also learned that the forgery had been carried out by Columbia Pictures head David Begelman, and on reporting it he inadvertently triggered one of the biggest Hollywood scandals of the 1970s.[21] As a result of Robertson's whistle-blowing, Begelman was charged with embezzlement: he later was fired from Columbia. Robertson was subsequently blacklisted by the people who run Hollywood]for several years before he finally returned to film in Brainstorm (1983). The story of the scandal is told in David McClintick's 1982 bestseller Indecent Exposure.

 

[5Stars]

And I believe you never read this book while at the Academy.

lol

Hooked On Phonics never worked too!

 

[tecolote]

Please try and remember a linebacker taken in the first rd by Bill Parcell for perspective on bust. Sometimes called Barbie.

Barbie was awful but Claiborne was picked much higher and cost us a 2nd. I hope he can rebound this year but he certainly did not start on the right track.

 

[TwoDeep3]

'Bust' isn't a meaningful word, since there's no agreed-upon definition of what it is.

I only consider a player a bust when they're unable to play in the league. Beyond that, it's just a question of a player not meeting expectations. If you're getting meaningful snaps from a guy, you get meaningful snaps. If you don't get as many as you hoped or expected, it stinks, but it's not considered a bust. That's because for my part, I think of 'bust' as in 'busted' or 'bankrupted,' which implies bottoming out completely.

So, this is your definition. Good to know.

 

[Setackin]

You're going on ignore you are highly annoying with these senseless posts just trying to drive up your count.

How do u do that? I would like to ignore him too.

 

[5Stars]

Barbie was awful but Claiborne was picked much higher and cost us a 2nd. I hope he can rebound this year but he certainly did not start on the right track.

We really don't know what is going on right now. So, we cannot say he is on the wrong track yet.