Yes because Romo will look like Brady after not playing a meaningful game in 12+ months.And you don't replace the QB who is helming that 'special season'. If Romo loses a game, he gets pulled for Dak right?
I mentioned that in another thread. lolSo Romo can stink it up and lose a couple of games, but the guy who won you 11 in a row can't?
Dez was awful, but the rest of the offense was good enough imo.
Why do you suppose it didn't happen?Better player starts, always.
Unfortunately, your probably right.If he continues struggling the next 2 games I might put Tony in some for the Philly game just to iron out the rust. I wouldn't expect much though. He hasn't played in a year and he keeps getting hurt. If the offense doesn't turn it around without Tony I don't think we win the SB anyway.
So Romo can stink it up and lose a couple of games, but the guy who won you 11 in a row can't?
I love Romo also but I agree I wouldn't start him next week. Now the week after may be up for grabs if the offense stalls again.It's a legitimate question. Do you start Romo next week?
I wouldn't, and I love Romo.
You mean he took control and led game winning drives. Isn't Tony Romo the king of fourth quarter comebacks? That means he essentially 'sucked' the whole game and opened up the offense in the end, so we're going to penalize Dak for doing the same?He has looked bad for 3 games, but was fortunate in two.
I'm thinking of that Carolina game. I know I know he wasn't healthy. Not like he was in pre-season.November 26, 2015…
The last time Romo played a meaningful game, and he wasn't good.
Some of you are chasing a memory of what he used to be. Some of the hits Dak shook off tonight might have put Romo on the bench.
As a serious gamer and someone who has played Madden for 25 years, I second this notion.It is a real question, I've been a football coach for 29 years, and regardless of what the average fan thinks, EVERY job really is on the line every week. There is a lot at stake here. Whatever it takes. That being said, I give Dak the benefit of the doubt, but I think his rope is getting shorter.
Throws to every receiver seemed off the mark because they were off the mark. Your second point is correct.no it wasn't, T. Will thinks every catch he makes is 1st down, throws to ever receiver seemed off the mark. The only reason why this was not a beatdown was NYG offense was just as inept and made T. Crawford and Mayowa look all pro.
Some illusory concern about "chemistry". I doubt the chemistry is great right now.Why do you suppose it didn't happen?
Really yeah it was him forcing and recovering the ST fumble in Minny. Are you saying that we can win it all with the way Dak is playing right now.You mean he took control and led game winning drives. Isn't Tony Romo the king of fourth quarter comebacks? That means he essentially 'sucked' the whole game and opened up the offense in the end, so we're going to penalize Dak for doing the same?
It's not about Dak, it's about the team. Have they been winning solely because of Dak? I agree, keep riding him, but what if it continues going south?This team got this far with Dak. You ride with him all the way. This is his team now.
November 26, 2015…
The last time Romo played a meaningful game, and he wasn't good.
Some of you are chasing a memory of what he used to be. Some of the hits Dak shook off tonight might have put Romo on the bench.