News: PFT: Federal judge reinstates Ezekiel Elliott suspension

Ghost12

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,845
Reaction score
1,790
Or they are using this for appeal. Maybe they were hoping she’d rule in favor originally. Now they have reason to get decision thrown out. In which case TRO likely reinstated
It is weak grounds for an appeal if it is not asked for up front.
 

AzorAhai

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
8,901
Well it was actually the Brady ruling that did that.... I am wondering how much, if any, outrage this forum showed when that ruling was issued....
It’s not just the ruling. It’s everything she outlined and how she came to the conclusion. She practically told the commissioner do whatever you please, you earned this.
 

Ghost12

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,845
Reaction score
1,790
Studying for the MPRE right now and listening to the Barbri lecture over judicial ethics. The lecturer said, "A judge MUST disqualify him or herself where their impartiality could reasonably be questioned, unless parties remit." Applications for this: personal bias, prior involvement in case, when former partner or close relative is a party attorney or witness in proceeding, economic interests in case, public statements by judge that pidgeon hole them into a particular position.

Doesn't sound like the judge would have to recuse herself just because her husband formerly represented a party in the case. I dunno though.
That was my original impression but then I changed my mind after doing some research. Check out my post on precisely how ingrained her husband's firm is in pro sports (assuming it is indeed her husband which I don't think we've confirmed yet but it sure seems like he is).
 

Ghost12

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,845
Reaction score
1,790
In my experience that capitalism in actual practice. I'm one rung down from the 1%, so I've seen the 1% protect each other with grotesque money and power benefits among each other at the expense of the rest of us many, many times in corporate America. I'm not proposing a better solution, and I'm not on food stamps nor begging for sympathy, but capitalism in practice breeds corruption and exploitation.
Every economic system breeds corruption and exploitation.
 

Philmonroe

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,587
Reaction score
4,967
This is why a PC Policy was needed. Because many of these charges won’t be prosecuted.

The NFL wanted a mechanism in place to discipline their players to provide a perception the league was sensitive to these issues in an attempt to protect the leagues image.

Being found guilty of DV under the NFL PC Policy doesn’t mean they are a “ women beater”. But there was enough evidence to administer the suspension . Big difference . I’m not sure all fans understand the difference?

Like I said. The core issue is with the PC Policy. Once you fully understand it’s intention you’ll better understand the decision.
Sounds good like I post before you must've just been born if you don't understand how this looks. That is like saying someone getting suspended for some type of ist act wouldn't look like they are that particular ist. Come on you know how that will look to many.
 

revospeed

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
3,787
That was my original impression but then I changed my mind after doing some research. Check out my post on precisely how ingrained her husband's firm is in pro sports (assuming it is indeed her husband which I don't think we've confirmed yet but it sure seems like he is).

Speaks to how there is a lack of monitoring on judicial authority if there is a conflict that apparent and she didn't refuse herself.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,434
Reaction score
12,208
In my experience that capitalism in actual practice. I'm one rung down from the 1%, so I've seen the 1% protect each other with grotesque money and power benefits among each other at the expense of the rest of us many, many times in corporate America. I'm not proposing a better solution, and I'm not on food stamps nor begging for sympathy, but capitalism in practice breeds corruption and exploitation.

What you have experienced is not capitalism then.
 

links18

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,916
Reaction score
19,509
Could be. The economic interest extends to family members as well. I dunno if his firm is still representing the NFL though. If it's a past case, then there shouldn't be an economic interest anymore.

There is still an economic interest in having your prior work validated by a court of law.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
SCOTUS HERE WE COME

Honestly Trouty,

I doubt SCOTUS would even take the case. There is too much historical background on how the NFL and the Union work. Besides, nobody wants that. The Owners do not want to go to SCOTUS, the NFLPA, if they are smart, would not want to see this happen and SCOTUS doesn't want it.

I think that eventually, this will die a slow death and that will be that. The best we can hope for, IMO, is that Zeke learns from all of this.
 

revospeed

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
3,787
There is still an economic interest in having your prior work validated by a court of law.

I think the rule that applies to mandatory judicial refusal involving an economic interest involves an economic interest in the case at bar.
 

Ranched

"We Are Penn State"
Messages
34,885
Reaction score
84,323
22894173_1684395794940435_3997870412194470649_n.jpg
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
Team should just say "****" and not even bother taking the field Sunday...........between this biotch judge and the ridiculous one-sided officiating, I'm just about done with football for awhile.
:lmao:
I've often pondered those exact sentiments,,, the constant fusillade of yellow casing-liner's dictating the tempo,direction and outcomes of games(not just Cowboy games:eek:) is beyond blatanto_O
 

links18

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,916
Reaction score
19,509
I think the rule that applies to mandatory judicial refusal involving an economic interest involves an economic interest in the case at bar.

All that is necessary to warrant a judicial recusal is the possible appearance of impropriety: not actual impropriety, not the appearance of impropriety, just the possible appearance of such to a reasonable person. Of course, the NFLPA's lawyers had ample time to raise this issue and failed, even if the judge should have taken it upon herself to defer.
 

lukin2006

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,965
Reaction score
19,287
Company policies can over ride laws for conditions of employment or causes for discipline and termination as long as they aren’t discriminating.

The NFLPA agreed and empowered the commissioners office to take discipline on these issues without depending on the justice system to arrive at convictions or guilty pleas.

Did Brady break any laws deflating footballs?

C’Mon Cowboy fans . Stop the whining. Elliott hasnt been a choir boy. While his Conduct hasn’t been determined criminal it defintely falls within the parameters as detrimental to the league.

I don't agree company policy should over-ride legislated laws...
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
In my experience that capitalism in actual practice. I'm one rung down from the 1%, so I've seen the 1% protect each other with grotesque money and power benefits among each other at the expense of the rest of us many, many times in corporate America. I'm not proposing a better solution, and I'm not on food stamps nor begging for sympathy, but capitalism in practice breeds corruption and exploitation.

Human nature breeds corruption and exploitation. You are absolutely right that corruption and backroom deals are common in this country, but visit any country that was under the Soviet Union and you will see much, much worse behavior.
 
Top