lopey
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,210
- Reaction score
- 2,902
I think he got benched....We're missing our starting LG too. The fact that we have a good backup doesn't change that fact. Don't penalize us for having depth.
I think he got benched....We're missing our starting LG too. The fact that we have a good backup doesn't change that fact. Don't penalize us for having depth.
You know that's lottery chances yourself hence putting if not when he wins a Super Bowl. He isn't that good but he is the current avg QB.
Folks, if the quarterback on your team is not playing at the level of Brees, Brady, Ben, Goff, & Mahomes, then you better keep looking for another quarterback. I'M not satisfied with mediocre quarterback play.
So Weeden is as accurate as Dak and maybe we should start him, because at least he can throw deep.
No its not
hmmm...clearing my throat, forgive me, but all QB'S need a "clean pocket" don't they? lol...Otherwise, its kinda hard to do your job as a QB. I thought Fleming had a nice quiet game filling in for Tyron btw. Didn't really have any major issues. Did good. Nice to know we have decent depth behind Tyron and Fredbeard.Note when the Commanders were sacking Dak in the first half how he suddenly started throwing bad passes? This goes back to what I think is his problem. He needs a clean pocket.
But one of the big factors is that Dallas had crappy field position all day and Linehan was calling some stupid plays during the second quarter. My opinion.
You people that bring up Romo as a catch all for every critique about Dak are just as pressed as the other side. Y'all both sound like delusional groupies waiting to get backstage. Romo been retired and Dak is avg on his own merits. I wish y'all stop bringing up Romo at least when replying to me because I've never even compared the two outside of saying I thought Romo should've got the QB job back in 2016 but get why they stayed with Dak.Well, unlike a lot of "geniuses" here, I don't proclaim to be able to predict the future, hence the "if."
I can, however, unequivocally state that Romo never won a Super Bowl, which makes his cult-like status around here so confusing, especially in light of the fact that Staubach and Aikman actually did.
So, to restate, if Dak does win it, it'll be so sweet watching his haters try to bring him down even after.
Don't know what stat does measure accuracy but I know what doesn't measure accuracy and that's completion percentage. If that was the case every dang scout coming in would've said Dak was accurate and that wasn't close to the consensus even though he had 66% or so accuracy in college his last year or two. He wouldn't been a fourth rd QB if he was so accurate in college and going by your claim of completion percentage equaling accuracy he was accurate.What measures accuracy then?
Completion % is the gold standard for judging accuracy in QBs coming from college to the pros.
You people that bring up Romo as a catch all for every critique about Dak are just as pressed as the other side. Y'all both sound like delusional groupies waiting to get backstage. Romo been retired and Dak is avg on his own merits. I wish y'all stop bringing up Romo at least when replying to me because I've never even compared the two outside of saying I thought Romo should've got the QB job back in 2016 but get why they stayed with Dak.
Well since chances are slim that he will win what will you use the 2016 forever?
Don't know what stat does measure accuracy but I know what doesn't measure accuracy and that's completion percentage. If that was the case every dang scout coming in would've said Dak was accurate and that wasn't close to the consensus even though he had 66% or so accuracy in college his last year or two. He wouldn't been a fourth rd QB if he was so accurate in college and going by your claim of completion percentage equaling accuracy he was accurate.
Dak is in his third season and no defense is respecting the deep passing game. Even decent passers make the throws Noah Brown, Beasley on the sideline, and the deep pass to Gallop.Would you have played Brees and Goff before they turned into Brees and Goff? It didn't happen overnight.
If Dak could stretch the field, Dallas is 9-2 easily.
Just talking about two plays...the thread was about the last couple games.DAL is now 28th in yards after catch....
http://stats.washingtonpost.com/fb/tmleaders.asp?range=NFL&type=Receiving&rank=231
The Chiefs have almost 1900....
Brees has 1417 yards after catch.
Every QB in the league gets inflated pass totals via yards after catch.
DAL had a WR corps of body catchers and guys who couldn't take a hit.
It was an awful group.
Yesterday they benefited from a true 1 and even had Noah Brown break a tackle.
Prior to 2 weeks ago DAL had no one who was breaking tackles.
Dak is absolutely in a system that pads his completion percentage. The same system does hurt his raw passing totals as well.Every single report mentioned how improved his accuracy was in his final year, calling attn to his improvement from 60% to 66% completion.
The stat is used specifically to measure accuracy.
Some QBs can pad these stats depending on their system. Dak is not in one of those systems now.
We get painted as Fan boys or haters by what side we seem to be on more often. You happen to wear a Dak fan boy uniform even if you're not one just like some will think I wear a Dak hater uniform. That's what it is and "you people" just describe you and others who all stay mentioning Romo when I didn't mention him so why are y'all bring him up? That's what you people means in this context and nothing else.Good, cuz I wish you'd stop with your "you people" when discussing Dak with me.
I'm certainly not a Dak hater, but don't paint me as some Dak fan boy.
I just want a QB who can lead us to the promised land. You can't get to said promised land without making the playoffs, and right now, we're in the hunt, so all is good with me.
Now, as with all of our previous QB's, including Mr Romo, if he does great things to help, cool, but if he he hurts us with INTs or poor judgment, you can bet that I'll say something.
I just think the Dak haters, especially in light of recent events, are way too irrational, and for the first time in my many years on this forum, I'm putting people on ignore.
Reality is whether a pass is thrown 5 yards or 75 yards it is either catchable or not.Every single report mentioned how improved his accuracy was in his final year, calling attn to his improvement from 60% to 66% completion.
The stat is used specifically to measure accuracy.
Some QBs can pad these stats depending on their system. Dak is not in one of those systems now.
We get painted as Fan boys or haters by what side we seem to be on more often. You happen to wear a Dak fan boy uniform even if you're not one just like some will think I wear a Dak hater uniform. That's what it is and "you people" just describe you and others who all stay mentioning Romo when I didn't mention him so why are y'all bring him up? That's what you people means in this context and nothing else.