Re-signing our own (strategy)

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Say what you want about the Cowboys, the organization has done a great job of acquiring talent and improving our cap at the same time. They have used the draft successfully and avoided huge free agency gaffes recently.

The team arguably wants to sign Tank, Dak, Zeke, Byron, Cooper, and Jaylon. Right now Tank, Cooper, Dak and Zeke seem to be the priority.

So here is the thrust of this thread: The Cowboys KNOW that the cost of doing business is going up every year and often with the year as new contracts are signed.

They have obviously tried to sign Tank, to no avail. It sounds like the team places a different value on Tank than Tank thinks he is worth. But is that true of all of these players?

It would seem that if Cooper, Dak and Zeke are high priority signings that it would have been better to have already extensions lined up. Cooper was already eligible for an extension since he was playing in year 4 of his rookie deal. Why didn't they go ahead and pay extend him before now.

Some of you will say that the team is cheap or stupid or both, but I refuse to believe that. Other than those two lame excuses why do you guys think they haven't already negotiated deals or deals in principle with these players prior to now.

Also going back to Tank, it seems like the team is going to force Tank to play under the tag which probably is smart for the team in terms of the cap, but could be problematic otherwise. It would seem that a trade would be better than allowing Tank to Tank half the season due to his shoulder injury.

I would like some intelligent discussion on this subject.

Others teams are making big signings, but some are also losing big names. The Cowboys work to resign their own big guys so that doesnt happen.

I am all for NOT signing first day guys but they need at least to get one quality safety and I would have had no issue signing a guy like Amos from the Bears for 8 or 9 million or a guy like Cook the TE from Oakland.

At this point, here are the big holes for the Cowboys:

DT, DE, S, TE, backup RB

You need to fill one of those holes with a quality FA.
 

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,820
Reaction score
6,051
Others teams are making big signings, but some are also losing big names. The Cowboys work to resign their own big guys so that doesnt happen.

I am all for NOT signing first day guys but they need at least to get one quality safety and I would have had no issue signing a guy like Amos from the Bears for 8 or 9 million or a guy like Cook the TE from Oakland.

At this point, here are the big holes for the Cowboys:

DT, DE, S, TE, backup RB

You need to fill one of those holes with a quality FA.

You just have to be patient. They will fill all their holes for backup and rotational players in the next 3 weeks and then play for the draft. If they don't get everyone they want in the draft and UDFA, they will look at June 1st and TC cuts. I guarantee that they will have 53 players ready to go for
the 1st game just like every year. Quality is in the eye of the beholder and that isn't anyone on this board for sure.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
You just have to be patient. They will fill all their holes for backup and rotational players in the next 3 weeks and then play for the draft. If they don't get everyone they want in the draft and UDFA, they will look at June 1st and TC cuts. I guarantee that they will have 53 players ready to go for
the 1st game just like every year. Quality is in the eye of the beholder and that isn't anyone on this board for sure.

Are you talking to someone else?
 

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,507
Reaction score
11,384
I really don’t mind their strategy for the most part. I’d love to see one thing added to it though. Go fix your biggest weakness with a top free agent each year. Just one, that’s it. Then look for bargains in other places of need and keep killing the draft. I think that would satisfy most everyone and help the team be more competitive.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,009
Reaction score
18,811
I agree with most of what you have to say, but if Dak has another year even like last year we are gonna have to pay 28+ to keep him and with our FO that is not even out of the realm if signed sooner

Easy. Transition tag him next year and we'll see what he's worth.
 

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
Stephen's grasp of how to deal with resignings and the cap is excellent. the giants played the free agent game to excess just a couple of years ago, to no avail. then they went all in on obj to the detriment of the rest of the team. now obj is gone, Olivier Vernon is gone, eli apple is gone and brandon Collins is gone. the money is limited. it must be spent wisely.
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,355
Reaction score
13,719
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Say what you want about the Cowboys, the organization has done a great job of acquiring talent and improving our cap at the same time. They have used the draft successfully and avoided huge free agency gaffes recently.

The team arguably wants to sign Tank, Dak, Zeke, Byron, Cooper, and Jaylon. Right now Tank, Cooper, Dak and Zeke seem to be the priority.

So here is the thrust of this thread: The Cowboys KNOW that the cost of doing business is going up every year and often with the year as new contracts are signed.

They have obviously tried to sign Tank, to no avail. It sounds like the team places a different value on Tank than Tank thinks he is worth. But is that true of all of these players?

It would seem that if Cooper, Dak and Zeke are high priority signings that it would have been better to have already extensions lined up. Cooper was already eligible for an extension since he was playing in year 4 of his rookie deal. Why didn't they go ahead and pay extend him before now.

Some of you will say that the team is cheap or stupid or both, but I refuse to believe that. Other than those two lame excuses why do you guys think they haven't already negotiated deals or deals in principle with these players prior to now.

Also going back to Tank, it seems like the team is going to force Tank to play under the tag which probably is smart for the team in terms of the cap, but could be problematic otherwise. It would seem that a trade would be better than allowing Tank to Tank half the season due to his shoulder injury.

I would like some intelligent discussion on this subject.


They need a better plan. We need to do more than sign super cheap guys that only have upside because there are no expectations.

1. Identify the most expensive FA positions. DL, QB, WR, CB, etc.
2. Use the draft to aquire talent at those positions.
3. Use free agency to pay for those positions that are relatively cheap.

Examples-
Dlaw wants 25+ a year-

ET- got 15
Malcom brown- got 5
Ingram- got 5

Ingram and Earl are certainly really good at their positions. While DLaw is a beast he is also a bigger risk than adding the other 3. If Malcom fails it's easier to part ways and you still have 2 other good pieces. Chances of all 3 failing or being injured is much smaller than DLaw not living up to a massive deal. And we haven't even talked about trading DLaw yet.

4. Buy low (draft) and trade high. That is how you reload quickly.

We are one of the best drafting teams around more picks helps keep our talent pool stocked. It also gives us room to make smart trades if needed.
 

Parcells4Life

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,494
Reaction score
9,345
No one has mentioned the biggest problem with not having Tank signed today. His labrum!

It’s going to take awhile for him to recover from the surgery and get his strength back up. So if he doesn’t sign until July it’s very doubtful he’s 100% by week 1. It may not even be until October.

So while everyone just assumes he’ll either play under the tag like last year or sign st last minute like Dez, they’re forgetting he won’t put up his normal production if he’s not healthy or if he’s still recovering from surgery to start the year.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,991
Reaction score
20,168
You make some very good points bro...…………….I agree that we should be extending these guys a lot sooner.

The one part I disagree with you on is them being cheap. On actual cash spent last season, Dallas is 30th in the NFL while being #1 in revenue last season. This is clearly a change from how this team operated in the past and is all due to Steven Jones taking over personnel contracts now.

So we literally make the most and spend the least...………….if that is not the definition of being cheap, I dont know what is.

We have not had any real cap room until this year. We have been forced to go low budget just to get close to being back in line on our cap.

If this continues once we get all our people we want to keep signed and we still have tons of cap room then I will agree with you on cheap, but not until then because I don't believe it at this point.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,991
Reaction score
20,168
They’ve gone from overspending to underspending with no middle ground, gotta find a balance. Stephen sure isn’t the wildcatter his pops is and right now seems to be way more tentative to take risks. I can only hope that he finds a middle ground sooner than later.

He "spent" money last year by trading for Cooper because that effectively was a commitment to Cooper going forward.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,991
Reaction score
20,168
IDK......for some odd reason, Stephen seems to stretch these decisions out to the last min, backing himself into a corner and sometimes even costing more money. Bottom line....over the next couple years we FOUR elite free agents and only two tags.

DLAW
Byron Jones
Dak
Cooper
We probably need to get at least 2 done this year. Otherwise, imagine going into 2020 wanting to sign ALL four players with only one tag. Hell, that's putting unnecessary leverage in the player pocket coz they know you're back against the wall to either accept our demands or lose w/o compensation.

Honestly, Coop probably has the most coz his agent knows no way in hell we're letting Coop walk after giving up a first rounder. So you might as well get ready to pay him top 3 money of $17-18M per.

Just me but I would give DLaw contract a self-made deadline of the week before the draft. Other words, stop bsing with nego'ing. Put your final offer on the table with a drop-dead deadline of draft week. If he doesn't except move him during the draft. I can make a case of 4 teams who could have strong interest......Chiefs, Raiders, Colts, Jets and even possible Falcons and Bucs.

Of all the four, B Jones is the only I don't see getting his money as a Cowboy.

The problem wait waiting that long on Tank is that the free agency money dries up. You will get more out of him the more bidders there are unless that is the Cowboys draft plan to force Tank to sign longer term.
 

DBOY3141

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
5,955
No one has mentioned the biggest problem with not having Tank signed today. His labrum!

It’s going to take awhile for him to recover from the surgery and get his strength back up. So if he doesn’t sign until July it’s very doubtful he’s 100% by week 1. It may not even be until October.

So while everyone just assumes he’ll either play under the tag like last year or sign st last minute like Dez, they’re forgetting he won’t put up his normal production if he’s not healthy or if he’s still recovering from surgery to start the year.
Jerry Tillery the DT from Notre Dame that's in the draft just had the same surgery.....3 to 4 month recovery. clock is ticking on the cowboys.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,991
Reaction score
20,168
I really don’t mind their strategy for the most part. I’d love to see one thing added to it though. Go fix your biggest weakness with a top free agent each year. Just one, that’s it. Then look for bargains in other places of need and keep killing the draft. I think that would satisfy most everyone and help the team be more competitive.
Satisfying everyone isn't the issue. Staying within the cap is.

Also the Cowboys have tried to fill all of their holes with at least something predraft so they can draft true to their draft board. That has worked well the past 5 years.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,391
Reaction score
26,895
Say what you want about the Cowboys, the organization has done a great job of acquiring talent and improving our cap at the same time. They have used the draft successfully and avoided huge free agency gaffes recently.

The team arguably wants to sign Tank, Dak, Zeke, Byron, Cooper, and Jaylon. Right now Tank, Cooper, Dak and Zeke seem to be the priority.

So here is the thrust of this thread: The Cowboys KNOW that the cost of doing business is going up every year and often with the year as new contracts are signed.

They have obviously tried to sign Tank, to no avail. It sounds like the team places a different value on Tank than Tank thinks he is worth. But is that true of all of these players?

It would seem that if Cooper, Dak and Zeke are high priority signings that it would have been better to have already extensions lined up. Cooper was already eligible for an extension since he was playing in year 4 of his rookie deal. Why didn't they go ahead and pay extend him before now.

Some of you will say that the team is cheap or stupid or both, but I refuse to believe that. Other than those two lame excuses why do you guys think they haven't already negotiated deals or deals in principle with these players prior to now.

Also going back to Tank, it seems like the team is going to force Tank to play under the tag which probably is smart for the team in terms of the cap, but could be problematic otherwise. It would seem that a trade would be better than allowing Tank to Tank half the season due to his shoulder injury.

I would like some intelligent discussion on this subject.
The season starts September 1st why is everyone so in a frenzy on what they are done or not done as of yet/ its been 3 days since the official league year started and 100 posts on the fo negativity. Impatient snowFLAKES. GIVE IT SOME DANG TIME!!

There’s ton Of Fas left , draft, tanks contract and discussions on extensions. It’s just begun
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,991
Reaction score
20,168
The season starts September 1st why is everyone so in a frenzy on what they are done or not done as of yet/ its been 3 days since the official league year started and 100 posts on the fo negativity. Impatient snowFLAKES. GIVE IT SOME DANG TIME!!

There’s ton Of Fas left , draft, tanks contract and discussions on extensions. It’s just begun

I'm not sure if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing with me. Lol. I'm talking about most bang for your buck/extension strategy. I'm one preaching patience overall. I just am a bit surprised that the Cowboys haven't hammered out an extension for Amari and signed him already.
 

Whyjerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,989
Reaction score
24,840
Say what you want about the Cowboys, the organization has done a great job of acquiring talent and improving our cap at the same time. They have used the draft successfully and avoided huge free agency gaffes recently.

The team arguably wants to sign Tank, Dak, Zeke, Byron, Cooper, and Jaylon. Right now Tank, Cooper, Dak and Zeke seem to be the priority.

So here is the thrust of this thread: The Cowboys KNOW that the cost of doing business is going up every year and often with the year as new contracts are signed.

They have obviously tried to sign Tank, to no avail. It sounds like the team places a different value on Tank than Tank thinks he is worth. But is that true of all of these players?

It would seem that if Cooper, Dak and Zeke are high priority signings that it would have been better to have already extensions lined up. Cooper was already eligible for an extension since he was playing in year 4 of his rookie deal. Why didn't they go ahead and pay extend him before now.

Some of you will say that the team is cheap or stupid or both, but I refuse to believe that. Other than those two lame excuses why do you guys think they haven't already negotiated deals or deals in principle with these players prior to now.

Also going back to Tank, it seems like the team is going to force Tank to play under the tag which probably is smart for the team in terms of the cap, but could be problematic otherwise. It would seem that a trade would be better than allowing Tank to Tank half the season due to his shoulder injury.

I would like some intelligent discussion on this subject.

I agree they are focused on their roster and have a bunch of key contracts they need to consider. That is why I never bought into the Dallas having $100MM in cap fake news. The issue I have is that it is clear Stephen Jones believes himself to be some sort of a cap guru and nothing is getting done. That this team did not have more of a "Go For It" mentality when they had a 4th round rookie contract starting at QB is a crime. Clearly they are too arrogant / stupid to see the urgency around that set up. I would also say they have 1 more year of that so why not go for it and bring in an ET. Next year Dak costs about 20-25 times what his salary is now. Think about that. I am glad that they did not add a Collins for $84MM but would Clinton-Dix at $3.5MM work. A huge upgrade at S there. The FO has been running pysch ops for 20 plus years. Fans are restless. They should be.
 

CPanther95

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,681
Reaction score
6,898
Third thread I've seen this. Pet peeve of mine.

Resign means to quit.

Re-sign means to sign a contract again.

Thanks.

So the Steelers failed to re-sign Bell and AB, but they successfully resigned them. :D
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,281
Reaction score
36,428
Exactly...……….I'm not saying go crazy and sign every free agent like the Skins did back in the day, but you got to take a couple of swings at the ball if you want to hit a homerun. Steven is just standing there, refusing to swing, and hoping to get on base by the pitcher throwing four balls.

Yeah, you can reach first base this way, but you are never going to hit a home run doing that.
I wouldnt say he’s refusing to swing. He’s just not swinging for the fences.

They are believing in their process which most would agree is sounder than it’s been. It’s producing one of the most talented teams they’ve had at least since Parcells was here.

And they did make a major move last year with Cooper. That was a swing for the fences that appeared to save the season. This first week in FA isnt the only week during the year to upgrade your roster.

I understand the frustration by some fans but when you’ve failed as much as we have in the past and you’re not great talent evaluators it’s probably wise not to risk your finances. Especially when you’re having as much success in the draft.

FA in the past for us was more of a necessity since we missed so much in the draft. We’ve obviously still had some misses recently but we’ve also had some major hits and why our focus appears to be more in retaining them.

As much as I’ve been critical of our dysfunctional organization our talent acquisition has been been better overall thru the draft and why we are where we are now. Not bad for this franchise.
 
Top