I look at them exactly in the same way I did in the Emmitt-Barry Sanders debate. Sanders would wow you more than Emmitt. He was a “prettier” runner. He would break more long, ankle-breaking runs. Emmitt was much more consistent and more dependable. He got the yards when you absolutely needed it. He put the team on his back at times. He ended games. If you’re down 4 with 50 seconds to go on the 4 yard line in the Super Bowl, who do you want to give the ball to? The answer is clearly Emmitt. Emmitt was the better, more complete back. Zeke is Emmitt and Barkley is Sanders. Thus endeth the lesson.
you bring up some very good points, – but in all fairness, Sanders did not have the awesome support cast around him with the Lions, ..as Emmitt smith did in Dallas.
Not only did we have All pro or pro bowlers all across the entire OL, but we also had a Hall of famer who is considered by many as the best OG that ever played, and
another that would have been a sure fire HOFer , If not for the tragic car accident in Erik Williams who manhandled other HOFers such as Reggie White and Strahan.
- Frankly we had the very best OL in the
history of the NFL, if anyone can think of one better, please do tell.
And that speaks a huge volume.
If you ever saw the NFL documentary “
Great Wall of Dallas “ , we’d see how monstrous holes that were opened up for Emmitt , while Sanders continued playing behind average (at best)
during his entire career, yet continued his pace that would have placed him as the all time leading rusher,
IF he had not suddenly and shockingly retired in the prime of his career.
(which I still think he was just sick of losing and Lions were not going to trade him) .. To me, that also speaks a huge volume.
- the flip side of it is what the Emmitt's and Zeke's do to help their teams, .
without them having to have the ball. and that's blitz- blocking. (which barry was very average to mediocre at that)
and many plays were/are made ,..and avoided because of that dirty work element at hand.
and I haven't seen enough of Barkley's blocking yet to judge his own blocking skills.
- Also I believe the Lions actually replaced Sanders with a bigger back around goal line and short yardage situations.
whether that was a matter of poor coaching decisions or a testament that tough, short yrd situations just wasn't Sander's suit, I still dunno.
- While I’m seeing Emmitt/Zeke and Sanders/Barkley comparisons, Emmitt has never had zeke’s breakaway home run hit ability. That brings a lot more element to your offense and that much
more fear factor to defenses. And because zeke has more of a speed element to his game, he can be more of a threat in pass game than Emmitt's dumpoff-safty passes ever was, (just a matter of better coaching to succeed with zeke)
I can see why the Barkley/Sanders comparisons - as facing and dealing with Saquon is just as defenses had to face with Sanders, 2 yds, here ..4 yds there , minus -1, ..and then 3 yds .. and then
boom a 64 yard TD sprint, .. he puts that much pressure on you to have to maintain gap lanes, discipline and gang tackle him to which you cannot let up on any given play …