News: TMZ reporting Antonio Brown Accused of Rape by Former trainer

[Rockport]

I wonder if she had filed a police report along with the lawsuit, would it have any bearing on the way the league handles it (probably not) or the Pats for that matter (that I’m not as sure of). Part of me thinks they don’t want this distraction, then I remember all the distractions they’ve dealt with (Hernandez, deflate-gate, spygate, Kraft) with no serious impact to their games.

Hoping like hell he’s not on the field this Sunday. There’s enough evidence to prove 1 of the charges in the lawsuit. Semper Fi!

 

[atlantacowboy]

Jerry never tried to sign him in the whole hour or so he was on the market.

haha

Oh , you know Rosenhaus was shopping him well before Oakland cut him. The Patriots had all their ducks lined up were ready. The release seemed to come as no surprise.

 

[Fizziksman]

Best thing to happen to AB. Now that he has been accused by rape by a femoid he will be able to gain a lot of sympathy from people as being a victim and the whole F AB train will be derailed.

 

[Mountaineerfan]

They definitely had sexual relations, it’s just a matter of if it was consensual or not. AB admitting via text that he did what he did to her while she was sleeping is disgusting if true. But he couldn’t just been saying that out of anger and pettiness.

With that said, Bob Kraft and the Pats are Goodell’s golden boys. Don’t see anything happening here without cold, hard evidence tbh.

If there wasn't an entire sub category on porn hub of sleeping individuals getting woke up, I would find it a little stranger.

Either way why did she not go to the police instead? I just find it hard to believe anyone without a police report at least being filed in this new world order which is #METOO.

 

[Rockport]

Best thing to happen to AB. Now that he has been accused by rape by a femoid he will be able to gain a lot of sympathy from people as being a victim and the whole F AB train will be derailed.

Another mouth breather ignoring the facts.

 

[MrPeanutbutter]

Maybe , you never know with bobby kraft ; & what he will instruct goodell to do.

Isn't it multiple allegations?

It's possible to make one allegation go away but multiple is tough.

 

[AbeBeta]

That was refuted , several times. In national television . He was several PSI below ...please .

Cheats are cheats .

Yes. National TV. That's where we learn science. That's where all the best science gets presented.

 

[joseephuss]

"no" and "don't" have the same meaning so you contextually have no point. Your defense of her weak story has less credibility than her weak story. lol You aren't helping her case so just stop trying. lol

"Don't, stop!"
"Stop! Don't!"
"No, stop!"
"Stop, no!"

I'm not seeing how "no" and "don't" have the same meaning. If you rearrange where "don't" is located you can get a different meaning in the word grouping. If you move "no" around it does not change the meaning.

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

Man typical gold digger. throw this away. I hope theres a day where women can be thrown in jail for these types of allegations. It takes time, energy, and resources away from real victims.

In ancient Rome, if the defendant was found not guilty, then the accused could face the same punishment for the crime of which they accused the defendant. It was called Calumnia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calumnia_(Roman_law)) (I normally wouldn't use Wikipedia for this, but I'm half asleep typing this, so here's something to support my statement for what it's worth). Perhaps, it's time that part of Roman Law is adopted into our laws and used if it is clear that the defendant is falsely accused.

 

[JoeKing]

"Don't, stop!"
"Stop! Don't!"
"No, stop!"
"Stop, no!"

I'm not seeing how "no" and "don't" have the same meaning. If you rearrange where "don't" is located you can get a different meaning in the word grouping. If you move "no" around it does not change the meaning.

no stop = go
don't stop = go
If you don't pause long enough between those two words, that is what can be heard. It's all in the delivery. You don't hear it because you don't want to hear it. It hurts your argument which you don't have, btw. We don't know how she said what she says she said or if she really said it at all. It's all hearsay and it will never convict AB in a court of law.

 

[Master22]

"Don't, stop!"
"Stop! Don't!"
"No, stop!"
"Stop, no!"

I'm not seeing how "no" and "don't" have the same meaning. If you rearrange where "don't" is located you can get a different meaning in the word grouping. If you move "no" around it does not change the meaning.

Is this what it comes down to now? It’s insane how things like this can be interpreted different ways to mean the opposite of each other.

Without commenting to these accusations specifically because I haven’t read much of the information yet, it feels like the best thing to do is just carry around a consent form and have them sign in agreement or bounce.

 

[Hennessy_King]

In ancient Rome, if the defendant was found not guilty, then the accused could face the same punishment for the crime of which they accused the defendant. It was called Calumnia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calumnia_(Roman_law)) (I normally wouldn't use Wikipedia for this, but I'm half asleep typing this, so here's something to support my statement for what it's worth). Perhaps, it's time that part of Roman Law is adopted into our laws and used.

One of my boys was locked up for 2 weeks for a false rape claim. The chick got pissed off at him called the police. They didn't ask any questions picked him up right out of his house. Couldn't afford the bail so he sat. Lost his job and nothing happened to the female.

 

[Master22]

In ancient Rome, if the defendant was found not guilty, then the accused could face the same punishment for the crime of which they accused the defendant. It was called Calumnia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calumnia_(Roman_law)) (I normally wouldn't use Wikipedia for this, but I'm half asleep typing this, so here's something to support my statement for what it's worth). Perhaps, it's time that part of Roman Law is adopted into our laws and used if it is clear that the defendant is falsely accused.

I would like to see identities remain hidden until the facts truly come out. The punishment they get for falsely accusing someone will never be the same as the damage caused to those who were accused.

 

[Master22]

One of my boys was locked up for 2 weeks for a false rape claim. The chick got pissed off at him called the police. They didn't ask any questions picked him up right out of his house. Couldn't afford the bail so he sat. Lost his job and nothing happened to the female.

It’s an awkward post like...

 

[Hennessy_King]

It’s an awkward post like...

That's how things are in the community unfortunately

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

It's hard to know what to believe anymore. When people wait months or years to report a crime, it's suspicious.

Hence why I think Calumnia should be offered as part of reforming our system. There seem to be a lot of fishy accusations going on toward high profile people. It seems to me that a lot of people rush to judgement when they here these sorts of accusations being levied against these sorts of people depending on their bias towards these certain individuals before letting the facts take place.

If this sort of thing is happening to high profile individuals, then I think it's logical to deduce that it is happening to lesser people in terms of stature as well. Thus, I think it is plausible if not likely that there are people in prison who are innocent of these sorts of crimes because people rushed to judgement too quickly. This begs the question of how many people are in prison right now who were subjected to punishment because of a false accusation.

Here is another Wikipedia link, for what it's worth, on wrongful convictions in the United States. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful_convictions_in_the_United_States

 

[Hennessy_King]

Hence why I think Calumnia should be offered as part of reforming our system. There seem to be a lot of fishy accusations going on toward high profile people. It seems to me that a lot of people rush to judgement when they here these sorts of accusations being levied against these sorts of people depending on their bias towards these certain individuals before letting the facts take place.

If this sort of thing is happening to high profile individuals, then I think it's logical to deduce that it is happening to lesser people in terms of stature as well. Thus, I think it is plausible if not likely that there are people in prison who are innocent of these sorts of crimes because people rushed to judgement too quickly. This begs the question of how many people are in prison right now who were subjected to punishment because of a false accusation.

Here is another Wikipedia link, for what it's worth, on wrongful convictions in the United States. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful_convictions_in_the_United_States

It's funny these chicks get upset for getting propositioned. I'm like shoot I wish my boss was a chick and pushed up on me for a promotion. Even if she's a slob, theres nothing a little henny can't fix

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

One of my boys was locked up for 2 weeks for a false rape claim. The chick got pissed off at him called the police. They didn't ask any questions picked him up right out of his house. Couldn't afford the bail so he sat. Lost his job and nothing happened to the female.

Yes, and I have to think that there are more like that. Look at Zeke too. While never charged with a crime because the accusation turned out to be false, he lost 6 games for a bogus accusation. The accuser in that case should have been prosecuted for a false accusation, and, under Calumnia, she would have received the punishment that Zeke would have gotten if he had committed the crime.

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

I would like to see identities remain hidden until the facts truly come out. The punishment they get for falsely accusing someone will never be the same as the damage caused to those who were accused.

Oh, no doubt. I think that as well. The identities should remain confidential until the facts are in. In most Western countries like the US, we convict on facts, not feelings or bias. We need to wait for the facts before rendering an opinion and afford everyone the same due process to which we are all protected.

 

[EST_1986]

Hoping like hell he’s not on the field this Sunday. There’s enough evidence to prove 1 of the charges in the lawsuit. Semper Fi!

He should be on the field. He's been convicted of nothing.