Deflection will get you nowhere. Same thing you do with everything that comes up. You take a side path away from the main discussion and steer it in a meaningless direction. Merry-go-round or merri-go-round. Loop argument.
By time you are finished with any "discussion" the main point has been lost in all the drivel. The main point is never addressed, often being lost in all the drivel that goes on back and forth.
Don't believe me? Go back and read the "discussion" (if you call it that) with stasheroo. 2 or 3 days yall have been driveling at each other so far away from the topic of the thread, its not even worth reading because nobody knows what the two of you are driveling about!
If you still don't understand, then its just a matter of time. And that's fine. I accept it.
Funny you talk about deflection. You claim I made a argument or a debate.....yet, you still haven't mentioned what the argument or debate is. And what Stash was doing is exactly what you are accusing me of doing. When he's proven wrong or asked to prove something he answers a question with a question. Its a tactic a lot of people do on this site when they can't admit they are wrong on something........
And then wanted to draft Cook so I do not think Prescott was high on the list. They had Romo returning from injury, backed up by Moore, Prescott could have ended up on the PS is not for those two injuries.
I do remember a lot of talk coming out that Wade Wilson was the Prescott guy within the organization. Prescott's stock dropped from his junior to senior season and the best SEC D's, Bama, Auburn and LSU, didn't help him any. He might not have even gone in the 4th if not for the Cowboys losing out on Lynch and Cook.
And posters want these people picking another QB? No thanks.
I do agree. I can't trust them. They can't be trusted. I give them minor credit for doing their homework on Dak but going after Connor Cook and Lynch...I Think both of those guys may be out of the league already.
I agree with this to a point. but I just have a problem with the way Prescott has played against top teams the last couple of years.
I don't look at it as a Dak issue I look at it as a team issue. This team in general seems to struggle with the top teams and to me that was a reflection on Garrett's coaching. Any time a starter is out it results in a loss. Teams win without their starters all the time but Garrett wasn't capable of winning a game they weren't suppose to. It would happened rarely like the Saints game 2 years ago.
Your attempt to confuse is going nowhere what i said is that QB's taken in the 1st round have a higher success rate than those taken in later rounds, at what point in your post did you dispute that? You didn't all instead all you tried to do is show how some 1st round QB's have faired, exactly what does that have to do with what i said? You can show whatever you want but the fact remains that in the NFL today most QB's starting were taken in the 1st round, it's a fact, your arguments are weak and not based on what is said to you. Name the starter on every NFL team today along with the round he was drafted in the majority were taken in the 1st round and that is what i stated...nice try
I'm not trying to confuse you......I think you got confused on your own......
I am the one who made this statement........
"Based on this history it seems to be the smarter gamble to get a guy later in the 1st round or later than it does to trade up for a quarterback."
I said that and you replied with "You're wrong"......
You can't create your own defense in a argument. My argument was it makes more sense to trade down and take a quarterback later in the draft than it does to trade up for a quarterback like that's being discussed in this thread and like the Rams and Eagles did for their guys.
