10 rules for ruling the off-season

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,491
Reaction score
15,655
It is silly season, i.e. the time of year where there is no real NFL action. It sucks and is just sad. This sadness and desperation is now filled with social media noise on a volume of 10. And I mean utter insane screeching where I state "noise".

To help return some sanity I'd like to make some basic rules for us to agree to follow.

Many will not agree of course but we will get to how to handle that as well.

Rule 1. NFL off-season trades are pretty rare. If you are proposing trading a guy your team has benched or has been mentioned as a possible cut you can not suggest trading said player for R1 draft picks and other insane hauls. If you think other NFL franchises are crazy, perhaps look in the mirror at your own idea first.

Rule 2. You can not trade a player to a team without the cap space to take on said player. While they may could create said room, if they have cap issues chances are they aren't trading for the guy you no longer want to pay or can't afford to yourself.

Rule 3. You can not trade free agents.

Rule 4. Repeat, you can not trade free agents. Tagging a player only retains rights on said player as far as the contract stands as is. To trade (or simply match or lose) a franchise tagged player the other team inherits rules for such. See Jadeveon Clowney being traded to the Seahawks last year. The Hawks could not resign or extend him before the season ended. Thus why the haul was 2 non-starters and a low 3rd round pick. --not 2 R1 picks.

Rule 5. NFL teams value different things in some cases but largely not. Draft picks are always valued because they provide cheap labor. Draft picks gain value as you approach their use; so picks in 2 months weight more than picks in 9 or 10 months. QBs are always valued because without them the NFL is the XFL. Teams do not trade proven QB starters under the age of 30. They just won't do it. Closest case has been Jimmy G who was unproven and it took Tom Brady's personal intervention to make that happen. You can trade for QBs who are under .500 for a career and 30+. See Ryan Tannehill. OR you can possibly pay gazillions for a former QB star on the sharp downside. See Payton Manning going to Denver.

Rule 6. If you and all your draftnik friends agree player X is your team's guy this early in the draft process, chances are good you have miscalculated player X's actual draft value. This has occurred almost yearly for the Dallas Cowboys fan base. Guys like Aaron Donald were always going to go before DAL picked. I suspect that will apply to Kinlaw this year .. BUT it could be the opposite, It could be Kinlaw has reds flag medicals and isn't even on the team's R1 board.

Rule 7. Don't get high off on your own draftnik study. ((Yes, I stole and badly worded this from Biggie's 10 crack commandments.)) Draftnik's fall in love with a guy to the point they can no longer process that player's actual strengths and weaknesses. Every good NFL play that player makes is another social media post. Stop it.

Rule 8. Google draft value charts before suggesting trades. Arguing you can trade pick 20 for pick 25 and 5 other non 7th round picks is goofy. Stop it. In reverse arguing you can trade up from 20 to 10 in round 1 for your 3rd is stupid. Stop it. There are lots of charts and numbers don't need to match but teams only throw them out totally when trading up for QBs.

Rule 9. If you do not have a QB nothing else matters. Teams are not wasting prime resources on anything else if they feel they lack a QB. Recall the DAL Carter/Henson/Hutchinson era... /shivers.

Rule 10. If you constantly see these rules being violated simply place that person on ignore/block. You can try to bring them to sanity but you can not correct crazy with a keyboard. You are far more likely to end up crazy yourself.

Here's to hoping we all survive, minds intact, to week 1 NFL 2020.
 

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,223
Reaction score
42,788
Rule 9 made me think Vikes season before they signed Cousin. Zim made the playoff with THREE different starters that season, Bradford, Bridgewater and Keenum, yet he got rid ALL three coz as he put it, they ALL had their own issues.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,324
Reaction score
95,981
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I thought the the thread title, it was going to be about the Eagles being the mediots off season darlings again. For how many years in a row now. :muttley:

Mostly agree though, too many fan get set on a certain player to love or hate for whatever their own reasons are. Rather drafted or a FA.
Then they unleash the mother of all keyboard strokes upon us, and never relent, especially when they are still wrong. :laugh:
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,115
Reaction score
8,807
It is silly season, i.e. the time of year where there is no real NFL action. It sucks and is just sad. This sadness and desperation is now filled with social media noise on a volume of 10. And I mean utter insane screeching where I state "noise".

To help return some sanity I'd like to make some basic rules for us to agree to follow.

Many will not agree of course but we will get to how to handle that as well.

Rule 1. NFL off-season trades are pretty rare. If you are proposing trading a guy your team has benched or has been mentioned as a possible cut you can not suggest trading said player for R1 draft picks and other insane hauls. If you think other NFL franchises are crazy, perhaps look in the mirror at your own idea first.

Rule 2. You can not trade a player to a team without the cap space to take on said player. While they may could create said room, if they have cap issues chances are they aren't trading for the guy you no longer want to pay or can't afford to yourself.

Rule 3. You can not trade free agents.

Rule 4. Repeat, you can not trade free agents. Tagging a player only retains rights on said player as far as the contract stands as is. To trade (or simply match or lose) a franchise tagged player the other team inherits rules for such. See Jadeveon Clowney being traded to the Seahawks last year. The Hawks could not resign or extend him before the season ended. Thus why the haul was 2 non-starters and a low 3rd round pick. --not 2 R1 picks.

Rule 5. NFL teams value different things in some cases but largely not. Draft picks are always valued because they provide cheap labor. Draft picks gain value as you approach their use; so picks in 2 months weight more than picks in 9 or 10 months. QBs are always valued because without them the NFL is the XFL. Teams do not trade proven QB starters under the age of 30. They just won't do it. Closest case has been Jimmy G who was unproven and it took Tom Brady's personal intervention to make that happen. You can trade for QBs who are under .500 for a career and 30+. See Ryan Tannehill. OR you can possibly pay gazillions for a former QB star on the sharp downside. See Payton Manning going to Denver.

Rule 6. If you and all your draftnik friends agree player X is your team's guy this early in the draft process, chances are good you have miscalculated player X's actual draft value. This has occurred almost yearly for the Dallas Cowboys fan base. Guys like Aaron Donald were always going to go before DAL picked. I suspect that will apply to Kinlaw this year .. BUT it could be the opposite, It could be Kinlaw has reds flag medicals and isn't even on the team's R1 board.

Rule 7. Don't get high off on your own draftnik study. ((Yes, I stole and badly worded this from Biggie's 10 crack commandments.)) Draftnik's fall in love with a guy to the point they can no longer process that player's actual strengths and weaknesses. Every good NFL play that player makes is another social media post. Stop it.

Rule 8. Google draft value charts before suggesting trades. Arguing you can trade pick 20 for pick 25 and 5 other non 7th round picks is goofy. Stop it. In reverse arguing you can trade up from 20 to 10 in round 1 for your 3rd is stupid. Stop it. There are lots of charts and numbers don't need to match but teams only throw them out totally when trading up for QBs.

Rule 9. If you do not have a QB nothing else matters. Teams are not wasting prime resources on anything else if they feel they lack a QB. Recall the DAL Carter/Henson/Hutchinson era... /shivers.

Rule 10. If you constantly see these rules being violated simply place that person on ignore/block. You can try to bring them to sanity but you can not correct crazy with a keyboard. You are far more likely to end up crazy yourself.

Here's to hoping we all survive, minds intact, to week 1 NFL 2020.

@jterrell...thanks for the write up. But, full transparency, you got that "Like" for the interpolation of B.I.G.'s quote and a reference to the song.
 

Oz-of-Cowboy-Country

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,259
Reaction score
17,077
@jterrell

I like your rules, now let's trade Tyrone Crawford for Russell Wilson. Even player trade. I'm sorry, did you skip out on the fact rules were meant to be broken?

I'm a rebel without a cause. :muttley:
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,146
Reaction score
7,490
Rules i already go by.


right now im so glad we have a new HC with his staff, im just waiting to see what he does. lots to do and not a lot time, per say. dont flak me on the actual time til the season. lots for the new staff to do.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
GO HOME DAKTARD!!!!

And by that, I mean that for 10% of this forum its pearls before swine.
 

Oz-of-Cowboy-Country

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,259
Reaction score
17,077
Rules i already go by.


right now im so glad we have a new HC with his staff, im just waiting to see what he does. lots to do and not a lot time, per say. dont flak me on the actual time til the season. lots for the new staff to do.
Per se

@Runwildboys hip me to that back on our DC.com days. So I'm just paying it forward, per se.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,368
Reaction score
94,334
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
He used per say in his post but it's per se not per say. I done the same thing back on DC.com and you enlightened me of my error. Because to tell you the truth i didn't know it was per se until you let me know. So I'm just paying it forward.

Per se......not....per say.
Ah, okay. I do remember that, now that you mention it, and I'm glad you took it the way it was intended. Some people get pissy when you try to teach them something. :)
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,118
Reaction score
14,024
People want to keep all eyes on me attention on Dak’s contract situation, (surely this board does) but there are far more areas, signings, or non-signing, movements or needed movements
where I am more concerned with.

1) Dak- We need to get him re-signed in on time in regards with a new HC, new offensive system vs a lengthy hold out & last deadline minute new contract signing. Cannot spend 2020 season trying to play catchup.

2) Trades, Free agency, Drafts, cap casualty, bargain re-signings - this is all gonna be set with the Cowboys management in collation with McCarthy. This is gonna set the measurement of this team.
- While you talk about Clowney trade to Seattle, Quinn was a brilliant trade on the Cowboys part. Low risk/high reward that did pay off big.
But will it be a one year wonder deal as the challenge is to re-sign Quinn. 11 sacks despite missing 3 games (2 per suspension) was a high reward.
What are the other options if not Quinn ? (Clowney ? Dante Fowler?)

3) Talk about Dak, or Zeke, or Cooper, or McCarthy, or Kellen… but as it seems virtually every year, it’s gonna come down to what we see the DEFENSE does for this team. If its about the playoffs,
it’s about a championship caliber defense. And we seem to fail to achieve as such on a yearly basis.
This offseason we’ll see what we ADD to the current group, and what we will LOSE from the current group.
What will be the Nolan-plan/preference on Defense ? What will be different with Nolan vs .. the Marinelli/Richard group ?

4) Amari Cooper – I have been so dwelling on this more than player here. (I have no worries about eventual Dak re-signing) but as Cooper is so viciously critical to Dak’s success and continuation,
we won’t/he won’t advance to the next level, with two No.2 type WR’s. Dak needs a true impact lead WR -
There has to be an lead Alpha Dog that takes over – even when pitted vs the better coverage CBs, and be equally effective at home as well as on the road.
And right now I don’t get the better feeling with Cooper. If we re-sign Amari to one of the richest WR contracts, I think what we see now, is what we are gonna get in the future.

Yes, He’ll light up the weaker sistas, but when he goes up vs Gilmore, Ramsey, Lattimore, Fuller, Peterson, etc type elite CBs . I think he’s gonna sulk, struggle and be usual non-factor.
In fact, if we happened to hear that Cowboys are willing to move on without Cooper and seeking a new lead WR- I’m actually leaning more towards that way/thinking too.
The big issue is actually finding that new, legit impact lead WR.


5) The lead WR is one matter – the other is getting the 2016 Zeke Elliott version back. Not the grind and pound runner that these past coaches (ala Gary Brown, Garrett) seem insisted
on him purely being. Teams are not frighten vs pounders. The Breakaway backs are the ones that make defenders sweat and on their toes, (ala Barkley, Henry, etc) Re-direct Zeke into
being more the “ splash” breakaway back than a Jerome Bettis.

6) It’s not just brought up much here and seems less a priority among some since Prescott has been just astoundingly durable – has yet to miss a game via injury.
But I still do not want to be content with Cooper Rush as our key backup QB. Knowing how this team my operate – a bargain vet QB or a late round draftee QB may well come into play.
And one concussion blow to the head, or a shot to Dak’s knees could place us in a bad position
where we cannot afford loses because of the QB. (remember Mahomes’ dislocated knee last year?)
 
Top