glimmerman
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 29,999
- Reaction score
- 29,875
Jones. We have a few more DE. Not many other CB.
Obviously as a fan I have no real clue about Quinn’s makeup...but it is fair to point out that his #’s significantly dipped and was subsequently traded after his 1st big contract. Could easily be a coincidence and injuries did play a part, but it’s not something that can be ignored in my opinion. Last year was his 1st 9+ sack season since 2014 and it happens to be (likely) his last shot at a good pay day coming up.
But again, I don’t know...Quinn could be an amazing teammate with a great work ethic.
Byron is a very good cover CB but the great ones that create TO’s deserve the big paydays. But how much did Rod’s Stone Age system play into the lack of TO’s?
Hard choice either way
I absolutely believe you build teams from the inside so in general i will almost always say the lineman is more important. However, one argument I would use against a pass rusher is that teams can negate great rushers with scheme. Quick passes, running right at an undersized rusher, roll pocket away, etc.. If you have truly high level cover guys, its harder to scheme them out of the game. (of course that means you need solid coverage across the board not just the one guy.) I simply offer this as i believe we sometimes overvalue pass rushers and then wonder why they didn't make the difference in the biggest games.
Byron Jones.
just coming into his prime.
i'd hate to see another team reap our harvest.
good CBs are hard to find...we got one...i'd like to keep him.
he might not have alot of picks...but i would love to see if those numbers would change with a new coaching staff.
Dallas has no legitimate #1 CB behind Jones so you sign him.
That is not correct. Plenty of data analysis that has shown good DBs are the better long term bet. For example the 2019 Pats didn't have anyone with more than 7 sacks yet were among the best at INTs. There's a reason Gilmore is in NE.
Agreed. It will be his 10th year in the NFL and he's had 3 seasons slowed down due to injuries and 1 season with suspension. Alot of wear on tear on that body. I personally keep Jones and invest an early pick at DTI don't expect Quinn to continue playing at a high level.
I absolutely believe you build teams from the inside so in general i will almost always say the lineman is more important. However, one argument I would use against a pass rusher is that teams can negate great rushers with scheme. Quick passes, running right at an undersized rusher, roll pocket away, etc.. If you have truly high level cover guys, its harder to scheme them out of the game. (of course that means you need solid coverage across the board not just the one guy.) I simply offer this as i believe we sometimes overvalue pass rushers and then wonder why they didn't make the difference in the biggest games.
Quinn. Although older, he will have a higher impact. our Pass rush was anemic at times and there were games he was the sole pass rusher with any impact. pass rush has much more impact on the passing game than a CB (outside of Darrell Revis and Dieon Sanders). Plus, jones doesn't get many interceptions..... I take quinn, due to his higher impact.Assuming you can re-sign one, which do you choose?
Please give your reasons.
Ahhhh but thats just it - he doesn't do that, he stays on one side of the field.Whom would you trust to follow the other teams number one if Byron isn't around?
Ahhhh but thats just it - he doesn't do that, he stays on one side of the field.
If he did shadow #1 WRs and shut them down then yes, you have a very good argument for resigning him - even without the INTs.
Debatable how valuable that is - sure you can shut down the #2 WR, but what good is that if the #1 WR is abusing Chido.Means nothing. He's still helping to shut down one side of the field.
Assuming you can re-sign one, which do you choose?
Please give your reasons.
Dallas has no legitimate #1 CB behind Jones so you sign him.