You are ignoring Rule #1 in all Cowboys trade talk. Rule #1 states, and I quote: When posting a thread about the Cowboys in a trade, the thread originator and all subsequent posters must assume the other team is as dumb, if not dumber, than the Cowboys. This includes poor players, injured players and retired players. The intrinsic trade value always exceeds the value to the Cowboys.
And, what about being soft spoken and respectful is a problem?
You were the one who said he was a problem, so why are you asking me to tell you what the problem was?
You lumped them together as players Gruden got rid of because they were problems. If the best you can do is try and pretend I was the one that did that, that's on you, and if you were talking about Amari without foundation, that's also on you.
I didn't say you called them both "crazy" - you are covering what you said by pretending I said something I didn't.
So, you have no idea what you were saying or why you were saying it when you said Gruden got rid of Cooper because he was a problem. lol - okay, I can go along with that.
It's a simple question - what was it about Amari that caused Gruden to think Amari was a problem that he needed to get rid of? You made the claim, yet you continually blow smoke rather than answer the question. You seem to think vague comments and asking me to explain what you said yourself qualifies as a response. It really only qualifies as a dodge. A pretty comical one at that.
