Plankton
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,011
- Reaction score
- 17,908
King doesn't "suck". He's out of the league because he didn't play the politic game well. You are trying to tell me Chris Jones is a better punter than Marquette King?
And I'm not even stuck on Marquette. I'd prefer getting a unknown with a big leg. I know its one out there there's one out there every year.
What's my problem with a older punter? The same problem I have with older players. I'd prefer youth or younger. Who wouldn't?
And reading how Chiefs fans feel about him....there are is a lot of "Its about time...." type comments.
Not that it's the be all and end all, but in roughly the same amount of punts (459 for Jones, 446 for King), Jones had nearly 400 fewer return yards allowed, had more punts fair caught (142 to 95), more punts downed inside the 20 (182 to 163), fewer touchbacks (King 34, Jones 23) and fewer touchdowns allowed on returns (King 3, Jones 0).
They are different types of punters - Jones is a directional punter more concerned with placement than distance on his kicks. King is a boomer who has had a tendency to outkick his coverage.
None of this is to mean that I think Chris Jones shouldn't have competition this camp. He absolutely needs to earn his job and not have it given to him. It's just that Marquette King isn't really a better punter when you take a close look.