Polkton31
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 642
- Reaction score
- 842
I actually agree with you, there are only a few QB's I'd pay that kind of money to, and Dak isn't one of them. I think that a guy like Dak needs a lot of talent around him to be successful, your ability to make that happen goes down if he's 20 percent of your cap. Good point on the new CBA though, that could change everything.
I wouldn't hate Dalton being the guy if Dak went down, in my kind they're somewhere in the same tier of QB, but I think Dak is the better option.
While I think its a bad idea for both parties, I've come to accept that we're stuck with the guy. With that being the case, I hope we're stuck with something that's team-friendly, a 4 year deal would not qualify as team-friendly.
I definitely feel better with Dalton as the QB2 if Dak holds out or gets hurt. Who knows, Dalton might surprise some people in this offense.
I agree 4 years might not be team friendly... But if that's the sticking point, then compromise. Since Dak likes betting on himself, make the deal for 5 years with the 5th year voidable if certain milestones are met.