NFL Passing Leaders In 2019 Without Garbage Time

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Not nearly as much as I do people who try and overstate the importance of statistics associated with individual numbers, with relation to winning. For example, the top 3 QBs on this chart didn't make the playoffs and 4 of the top 6, same deal.

The point of the game is to win. It's not to throw for the most yards.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
It doesn't change anything. Garbage time is not about whether you give up or not, it's about what the defense is doing. The Cowboys actually took garbage time to the extreme in that game... the Packers had I believe 5 TD drives in the second half and three of them were 80 yard drives. Even with that, the Cowboys allowing Flynn and the Packers to march up and down the field with minimal resistance would have worked if Garret and Romo had managed the clock better.

All you've done is try to change the idea that when a team is down by in this case 23 points that all the passing yards while the losing QB is trying to win is considered garbage time yards and making my point that as long as the QB is trying to win they are not garbage time passing yards. There are a number of reasons that the packers won that game. One as you pointed out the defense took the 2nd half off, Also Romo threw to 4th quarter picks and on 2 of those 80 yard drives of the packers getting a 23 yard PI penalty on 3rd down on one and a face mask penalty on a stopped 3rd down that gave them a 1st and 15 yards kept those 2 drives alive. At the end of the game the Cowboys still lead in time of possession and total yards with means they were trying to chew up the clock limiting the time the packers had to come back.

It doesn't change the fact that as long as a QB is trying to score and make a comeback those passing yards are not garbage time passing yards and when some here try to say Prescott had all of these garbage time yards the defenses on thise teams could have gone to sleep just like the Cowboys defense in that game.
.
 

McKDaddy

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,321
Reaction score
8,574
With all due respect to everyone, no one has these debates about great QB's. Everyone, no matter their team affiliation, can watch Mahomes, Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Elway, Marino, etc. and instantly know they are watching a great player.
 

weaver21

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,024
Reaction score
459
Completely disagree with half your post. Few if any Dak supporters would say he is better right now than Rodgers, Brees, Wilson or Watson. Is he competitive with them? Absolutely. And noone is saying he's better than Mahomes. But the Dak haters calling him a backup or not even top 20 is mind bogglingly stupid, assinine, ludicrous and reflects a disassociation from reality and is more trolling than sharing opinions.

There is definitely a medium when you block out the crazy agendas.

Agree to disagree then. The evidence of this is on this forum with the countless Dak threads. The guy is asking to be the highest paid player in the game and has one playoff win to his resume. I can understand some fans being upset at that notion. Me personally, I think it's all overblown considering Watson and Mahomes will overtake him anyway for that spot so it's irrelevant. Dak is a top 10 quarterback and deserves to get paid. Everything he's doing is what anyone would do in his position which is to set himself up financially for now and also the future. He wants to get paid the most money while he's still in his prime. But like I said, I can understand the outrage from some fans when they hear he wants to be the top paid player in the game.
 

weaver21

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,024
Reaction score
459
Never seen anyone call him a top 5 quarterback.....news to me.

Maybe not on here, but I've certainly seen and talked to Cowboys fans who have listed him as a top 5 quarterback, especially after his year last year. But that's the whole point about people being upset when they see him asking to be the top paid quarterback in the league. Is he top 5? No he's not. Hence why fans are upset at him asking for such money. It's the market and Dak has to reset it by wanting more money than Wentz or Goff and he's totally in the right to ask for 35+ million. The people who defend Dak all the time need to understand why people would be upset at seeing him ask for that type of money when in their eyes they feel like he hasn't earned it.
 

InTheZone

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,520
Reaction score
7,122
Garbage time is when every dak defender sits silent in the game day threads while the offense looks like the worst in the league, then Dak finally hits a receiver in stride in the 4th quarter and they're all like "CLUTCH!".
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,780
Reaction score
69,382
Maybe not on here, but I've certainly seen and talked to Cowboys fans who have listed him as a top 5 quarterback, especially after his year last year. But that's the whole point about people being upset when they see him asking to be the top paid quarterback in the league. Is he top 5? No he's not. Hence why fans are upset at him asking for such money. It's the market and Dak has to reset it by wanting more money than Wentz or Goff and he's totally in the right to ask for 35+ million. The people who defend Dak all the time need to understand why people would be upset at seeing him ask for that type of money when in their eyes they feel like he hasn't earned it.
Well understand when you ask for money you don't ask for money based on where you are at. You ask for money based on where you will be. If the Eagles paid Carson Wentz based on what he was they would've given him 15 million.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,780
Reaction score
69,382
Garbage time is when every dak defender sits silent in the game day threads while the offense looks like the worst in the league, then Dak finally hits a receiver in stride in the 4th quarter and they're all like "CLUTCH!".
Except you are creating this scenario. This goes back to people saying you can't have a civil conversation on this site. So much extremes, hyperbole and flat out lies.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,421
Reaction score
26,903
Don't you guys hate when people try to boost up how well a quarterback played especially when they have all those "garbage time" yards in them? Let's see what it looks like if you take out all of those garbage time yards out of it.

EXvvt4CWsAM3QCn
not sure how this can be accurate at all.. I mean what part if the game were they down 21? I mean Mahomes was down by 17 and 21 early in the games and came back by half time, hows that garbage time yards, that skill buddy to beat playoff teams after being down by that much..

the Garbage time narrative is hard to prove, I rather look at how QBs played against the better teams and better defenses that more accurate.. if qb comes back from 21 down to get within 10 or 7 points or less thats not garbage time as its a game they nearly won, in a lot of cases there are wins in there arent there?

Not legitimate in any way..you play 60mins until the clock reads zero and if you gave your team shot and nearly compete d a comeback, thats not garbage time..typical garbage time for me is when the final score is 2-3 scores but the last few drives you saw a lot prevent and put a lot of yards up and few scores but still cost by 10 or more points..
 

WillieBeamen

BoysfanfromNY
Messages
15,174
Reaction score
43,724
Garbage time is when every dak defender sits silent in the game day threads while the offense looks like the worst in the league, then Dak finally hits a receiver in stride in the 4th quarter and they're all like "CLUTCH!".
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,368
Reaction score
94,337
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
This thread's going to go where it's going to go but are they contending that garbage time is down by 21 at the end of the game or at any point of the game? Just thinking off the top of my head, weren't we down by 21 against GB in the playoffs before we came all the way back? And wasn't KC down by 21 to Houston in the playoffs last season? It's not garbage time when it happens early in the game and you have to throw to get back in the game. Some teams do mount comebacks.
I always assumed garbage time was only when you lost.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
All you've done is try to change the idea that when a team is down by in this case 23 points that all the passing yards while the losing QB is trying to win is considered garbage time yards and making my point that as long as the QB is trying to win they are not garbage time passing yards. There are a number of reasons that the packers won that game. One as you pointed out the defense took the 2nd half off, Also Romo threw to 4th quarter picks and on 2 of those 80 yard drives of the packers getting a 23 yard PI penalty on 3rd down on one and a face mask penalty on a stopped 3rd down that gave them a 1st and 15 yards kept those 2 drives alive. At the end of the game the Cowboys still lead in time of possession and total yards with means they were trying to chew up the clock limiting the time the packers had to come back.

It doesn't change the fact that as long as a QB is trying to score and make a comeback those passing yards are not garbage time passing yards and when some here try to say Prescott had all of these garbage time yards the defenses on thise teams could have gone to sleep just like the Cowboys defense in that game.
.
All this proves is that you're not good at reading. If the defense is more concerned about the clock than what you are doing, then it's garbage time. Whether that's a good strategy for them or not is irrelevant. You couldn't be more confused (and wrong).
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,519
Reaction score
34,617
Don't you guys hate when people try to boost up how well a quarterback played especially when they have all those "garbage time" yards in them? Let's see what it looks like if you take out all of those garbage time yards out of it.

EXvvt4CWsAM3QCn

I'm not sure if Winston and Rivers being two of the top three quarterbacks validates this statistical category.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,780
Reaction score
69,382
I'm not sure if Winston and Rivers being two of the top three quarterbacks validates this statistical category.
What do you feel it was suppose to validate? This thread was more so created to debunk the whole "garbage time" lie people keep putting on him.
 
Top