Brax
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,350
- Reaction score
- 6,987
Poorly that is a understatement, glossing over is a art form on this forum.Dak played poorly too. You can’t just gloss over that fact.
Poorly that is a understatement, glossing over is a art form on this forum.Dak played poorly too. You can’t just gloss over that fact.
You're hired as head of my HR! My profits will be through the roof! Product might suffer, but who cares!I would say 20 max take it or leave it
Sorry pj,that's not what you said...can't have it both ways.Garrett refused to run the ball. Coaches folded.
I think 20 m is fair don't u? and spend the rest for other players in order to maintain a good rosterYou're hired as head of my HR! My profits will be through the roof! Product might suffer, but who cares!
Lots of incentives.I think 20 m is fair don't u? and spend the rest for other players in order to maintain a good roster
Dalton ain’t taking us anywhere. Don’t sign dak that’s fine by me. But Dalton is not the answer.
I’m a Dak fan. But that’s a lot of cap space.Romo was paid the higest GTD and Aikman was the highest paid period in 93 and 99.
If Fish report is true would be 5yr 175m. If the 106m GTD is true that would be 60% of his total contract GTD, That is ****. Lol Even if you go north of Goff and go high, and say its 115m, its still only 65% and that is still ****. Wentz got 84% of his total contract GTD and Goff got 82%. If they just go under that on Dak with 80% GTD it would be 140m GTD, far off from 106m or even 115.
If they want to reset that market back down to what Wilson got 76%, Rogers 73%, and give Dak under that with 70%, it would still be 123m GTD. Hell, Tannehill just got 77% and that would put Daks at 135m GTD. So unless the GTD is AT LEAST 123m GTD, its not worth Dak to sign a 5 yr deal
If Fish report is true and its a 35m a yr with 106m GTD and its just about they years, then that says Dak is fine with the 106m GTD but wants it on a 4yr deal, which is fair. Its under market(Goff&Wentz) on the % of GTD and under market on the $s. That would put the % at 75% which was the market was before Goff and Wentz deals and still lower % than what Tannehll just signed. Its lower in $s than Wilson, Wentz and Goff. So if hes ok with that, and from this report he is, just wants it on a 4yr deal not a 5, then the Cowboys are holding this up by wanting a 5yr deal that puts it way under market on the GTD.
Stop paying attention the "sexy" total contract number and avg annual. The 106m GTD on 5yr deal is pure ****. If he takes it on a 4yr deal, its still under market in both % of total contract GTD and the overall $s.
I’m sure people said the same thing about grocery stacking Kurt Warner at some point. Now Warner is in the HOF.How so? Because you say it? Just curious.
When was Romo ever the highest paid player in the league?
Please list what season that was...………...and if you can find such a season, I suspect you cant, I theoretically would have been against that as well.
I kinda expect things like SB rings if a player wants to be the highest paid in the league.
Bombs Bombs Bombs excellent again sir..sad to say the teams that is Ownership and media butt sniffers sale the fans Lazy GM talk and cheap owner babble.LOL noooooo. There are people on this forum that know a lot more about the cap and contracts than I do, Im always asking them questions. This is just simple math and common sense stuff. The commons sense part is, if you see 106m GTD, which is lower than Goff and Wentz, you should ask yourself, why would he take less than them on a 4yr contract, much less a 5. . Then people will see the 175m and say, that is why because its the biggest contract in nfl history. But if you look at GTD compared to total contract, you SHOULD see that is pretty ******. It already under market on a 4 yr deal, why would he sign it on a 5yr deal to make it even worse. BTW, when I say YOU, I dont mean actually you.
Like I said, there are people who know more than me about this stuff, so if any of them disagree Id be willing to listen and learn. Nothing wrong about learning and educating yourself. The one thing I wont listen to, is the talk of Wentz and Goff deals were done with years left on the contract so its not comparable. The Cowboys had a chance to get it done with a yr left on the old deal and they blew it. Agents arent looking at that way. Dak agent, or any agent, isnt going into the negotiations and saying to the owner, " look, we know this is all new money and there arent any years left for you to add it to. We will give a 5yr deal with 4yr money so you can make it look better, and make yourself and the fans feel better about themselves." Im sure agents do bring that up when there are years on the old deal. Im sure they try to sell to ownership that the new money looks like a lot but if you count the yrs left its really not that bad. Lol But all the years left does is make one party feel better about the deal. Agents go off new money, not new money added to old money and how it looks.
I don't like it at all.
For sure. I’m not a huge fan of the Zeke production after holdout either. If there is a difference between the two it’s that Zeke was almost unanimously considered a top 3 RB in the league. Dak is top 10 at best and if you judge by his actions during the negotiations, you would expect him to be on the Mahomes/Brady level.What about that Zeke guy? Doesn't he help score too or no?
BingoBetter to give the Defense an offense that can put more than 6-9 points on the board by the end of the 3rd quarter, like the ....Saints, Bills, Jets, Bears, Eagles games just to mention a couple
None of these morons have the slightest idea what is going on in these negotiations. Why people keep thinking they do is beyond me. Dak and his agent aren’t talking. That leaves Stephen just running his mouth and changing the story every two weeks.
Being honest Mahomes , Wentz and Watson is betterYou did not ask me if I felt like he was a top 5 quarterback. You asked me did I feel like he should be paid like a top 5. That's what I'm saying yes to because I do feel like his ceiling is that of a top 5 quarterback. I'd say right now he's a top 10-12 quarterback. Depends who you ask. There are 4 or 5 guys you can argue are better or worse.
The point is though out of all the quarterbacks in his age group like Wentz, Goff, Watson, Mayfield, Mahomes, etc.? Mahomes is the only one who's better than him. So if you are telling me I'm getting one of the best young quarterbacks in the league at 26? I pay top 5 for that. Its not as black and white as getting paid based on how good you are.
Depends on who you ask.Being honest Mahomes , Wentz and Watson is better
You realize a year from now that won’t matter right. Matt Ryan was once the “highest paid player in nfl history” too and now his deal looks like a bargain. You guys need to educate yourselves$35 mill a year and over $100 million guaranteed and the dude is saying "nah, not good enough".
Seriously, is there anybody on this board that thinks Dak is worth this type of coin? Being the highest paid player in the history of the entire NFL?
Dude has one playoff win...………..ONE PLAYOFF WIN!!!!!
I'm sorry, but Dak is not worth this much, he just aint. I like the guy, have his jersey I wear on gamedays, but no way in hell am I making Dak the highest paid player in the history of the league. Call me hater all you want, but dude aint worth it.