Hennessy_King
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,625
- Reaction score
- 25,418
LolYou forgot this signal...
LolYou forgot this signal...
Nope gil just knows what real talent looks like. I mean it is how he got into the hall of fame. You salty or nah?Gil does not believe it. He put Dak there because dak is the current quarterback, and fans are creatures of the moment. Same reason best of the last hundred years lists have only players from the last twnty.
If it wasn't obvious I was in agreement and being a bit sarcastic I can't help you.So, it's not reasonable to state the facts about statistics and winning percentage? You don't think that's reasonable in comparing QBs?
Come on man, flesh out your response. If you have a point, make it. Otherwise your words are hollow.
Nope gil just knows what real talent looks like. I mean it is how he got into the hall of fame. You salty or nah?
Did you know he hosts a radio show called late hits on Sirius. And as someone who listens to it that man is sharper than you i promise you that. Man you ignent87 is a sentimental and senile age. A far cry from hall of fame performance.
And nah.
Did you know he hosts a radio show called late hits on Sirius. And as someone who listens to it that man is sharper than you i promise you that. Man you ignent
No not salty just proves what i suspected that you dont know anything about footballWhatever. You are the one who is salty. Does it bother you that i think dak is garbage?
The media itself manipulated the opinion of Romo to football fans and specifically Cowboys fans. While Gil is giving his opinion; he is a part of the media at this point.I don't think Gil Brandt is attempting to speak for the fans, just himself.
Gil’s been touting Dak since he was drafted . Long before he ever took a snap or the Slobberers hopped on. LolGil Brandt knows a winner when he sees one.
You do realize the tone of your voice doesn't come across in print, right?If it wasn't obvious I was in agreement and being a bit sarcastic I can't help you.
But the comment I responded to indicated Brandt was saying something different than fans, not that he was saying the same thing as fans. Besides, Romo is retired, and Brandt isn't a media guy that makes his living stirring up controversy like Skip Bayless and others anyway.The media itself manipulated the opinion of Romo to football fans and specifically Cowboys fans. While Gil is giving his opinion; he is a part of the media at this point.
For me personally I always looked at Romo as a gift and a curse. I always believed we had a chance with him at QB but was never surprised when he made huge mistakes.
Not this guy I wanted Dak in the 16 draft as high as the 2nd round. He only fell because of the dui which was later dismissed. Starkville, MS real shocker there. I have texts to my brother saved during the draft after round 1 we need to take Dak. Anyone that followed his team his junior and senior year knows he was a baller.Gil’s been touting Dak since he was drafted . Long before he ever took a snap or the Slobberers hopped on. Lol
And if Dak and the team ultimately have more success than the rest of QB’s in Cowboy history then Dak will most likely be placed on a pedestal much like Troy and Roger are.
Gil has always been the Homer type in addition to promoting the guys he touts and I’d say he thinks Dak has the potential to take us to a higher level than the rest in Cowboys history. Time will tell. Hope he’s right!
Dak has had that “ it” factor since his Rookie season. He’s a play maker. My criticism has always been about his pure prolific passing ability. And struggles against more elite teams.
are you sure? how well do you know gil? sounds like you are trying to justify that he has an agenda or bias, because you do....Gil does not believe it. He put Dak there because dak is the current quarterback, and fans are creatures of the moment. Same reason best of the last hundred years lists have only players from the last twenty.
Yup. That's why I initially read everything in a sarcastic tone. Makes things more fun.You do realize the tone of your voice doesn't come across in print, right?
3rd, 10th, 14th and 18th creates an average season of just better than 9th.The standard is always changing. look up where he is among his peers. As I said he was very efficient his first season. 3rd in the league. Since then he has been 18th, 14th and 10th. But hey if you consider that to be lofty then I guess that is your prerogative.
Tannehill had a career yearthat same year Ryan Tannehill was 117.5.
Really (in bold^^^)??? What games have you been watching the past 4 years? Certainly doesn't sound like you've been watching Cowboys games. If you had, you would know Dak has greatly improved his throwing ability, has consistently been in the top 5 in just about every QB statistical category, and he has definitely led this team to wins against some elite teams with top defenses.Dak has had that “ it” factor since his Rookie season. He’s a play maker. My criticism has always been about his pure prolific passing ability. And struggles against more elite teams.
Nailed it!3rd, 10th, 14th and 18th creates an average season of just better than 9th.
9th isn't average. There are 32 teams and 35/36 QBs who qualify yearly. That's right at top 25%
What's more is that "ranking" is hardly the overall measure.
QBR is more effective by far and he was 4th last year.
He's been 4th, 3rd, 19th and 5th for an average ranking just better than 8th.
If your "standard" is elite than say that and use that language but don't mislead or reduce your own argument by simply being factually incorrect.
Anyone expecting at QB to be elite his first four years is probably a mouth breather. Not even guys taken 1st overall accomplish that very often.
Wentz average QBR: just under 11th
Goff average QBR: exactly 22nd
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/nfl/qb/2019