Looking back: Was it a mistake not to go back to Romo

OGCowboy

OGCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
927
Reaction score
1,556
Nah...i don’t think he coulda made it. He was one tough pilgrim no doubt. But he took a beating. Idc what anybody says...the dude had sand and was a helluva QB....given the right breaks he coulda balled out OG time. But chips didn’t fall right for him. It is what it is.....jus sayin
 
Coy

Coy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
2,514
Typhus said:
Or Romo would be totally paralyzed from the neck down.
The change was made because Romo was getting hurt every time he got hit.
Im happy that Romo got out when he did, man is healthy and living the life.
Click to expand...

i agree with this, but that’s another matter. I would have loved to see Romo leading that 2016 team with that oline and Zeke at RB.
 
pete026

pete026

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,158
J12B said:
Actually he took about 8 snaps in one series in the final game of the season. It resulted in him throwing a td pass.

You're an idiot and have been proven wrong.
Click to expand...
You do remember that it was an 81 yard drive that included the following:
24 yard run by McFadden.
29 yard pass interference call on Dez.
Def. Holding call to convert 3rd down
A dink and dunk pass 2 yards past the LOS that McFadden ran for 11 yards and 1st down.
3 yard TD pass lol.

I didn't really remember the drive but after all the crazy comments of late, I figured I would check it out. Wow, it was pretty amazing what it has been transformed into..... especially being the inconsequential game it was.
 
JoeKing

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,538
Reaction score
31,012
Bobhaze said:
Apparently it has been forgotten how physically broken Tony Romo was in 2016. His back was terrible. I’m not sure he could have played even a half without getting hurt again. In his day, TonyRomo was a special player. But by 2016, he was damaged goods. Tony Romo’s time was up in 2016. If had anything left in that tank at the end of 2016, some other team would have signed him in 2017. He was done.
Click to expand...
Why do you fail to see the premise is not about Romo? What the OP is really getting at is Dak getting the starting job and now he's proving he's not worth the money he is asking for. It's always about Dak and his unearned coming payday. Agenda Agenda Agenda We can't have honest discussions with accurate recollections of the situation back then. You need to get with the program here and stop making excellent posts that honestly address the question asked. :rolleyes:[SARCASM]
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,765
Reaction score
20,837
J12B said:
I wonder how things would have played out in 2016 if Romo got his job back once he became healthy.

Perhaps he could have taken the team all the way to the Superbowl like he almost did in 2014.

Perhaps Romo could have played one more season and Dak would only have 2018 and 2019 as being a starter for this team. His value would most likely be worth less because 2017 was a down year for Dak.

Perhaps he could've got re-injured and Dak would've stepped back in only further proving Romo's durability issues.

But to this day I still think Garrett and Jones did Romo dirty by not giving him his starting job back.

Jason Garrett.....*shivers*
Click to expand...

The problem with Romo was durability. He played the best ball of his career in 2014. MVP level play. He looked very sharp in the one drive they allowed him. Hadn't played for months, and marched down the field for a TD. He was *already* paid for. Put him back in. If he breaks, you put Dak back in and you're back where you started.

This way we get two chances for great QB play. Dak wasn't going anywhere. If Romo doesn't still have it, move to Dak the next year, like we did. If Romo still has it, now you've got two franchise QBs. A good problem to have.

Dumping Romo let Garrett stick around longer. Moving on from Garrett (and lots of things) when Romo was done was an obvious move. By sticking with Dak, Garrett got a rationale to not rock the boat on the success with Dak.
 
Texas2Step41

Texas2Step41

Well-Known Member
Messages
293
Reaction score
473
Bobhaze said:
Apparently it has been forgotten how physically broken Tony Romo was in 2016. His back was terrible. I’m not sure he could have played even a half without getting hurt again. In his day, TonyRomo was a special player. But by 2016, he was damaged goods. Tony Romo’s time was up in 2016. If had anything left in that tank at the end of 2016, some other team would have signed him in 2017. He was done.
Click to expand...
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,765
Reaction score
20,837
Bobhaze said:
Apparently it has been forgotten how physically broken Tony Romo was in 2016. His back was terrible. I’m not sure he could have played even a half without getting hurt again. In his day, TonyRomo was a special player. But by 2016, he was damaged goods. Tony Romo’s time was up in 2016. If had anything left in that tank at the end of 2016, some other team would have signed him in 2017. He was done.
Click to expand...

Other teams: If Romo had anything left in the tank, the Cowboys would have played him in 2016.

Jerry kept trying to squeeze a draft pick out of Romo, and when most of free agency was done, Tony took a deal as the *lead* color commentator for CBS. Romo had a spectacular option in CBS, and Jerry holding onto Romo limited his options with other teams.

Some team would have certainly signed Romo with an incentive laden contract, but Tony didn't have to settle for "some team". He *shouldn't* have. Starting at the top at CBS was a *huge* opportunity. Only a handful of such positions exist, and most years, you don't even have an opening, let alone one that will take a newbie off the field. Without an offer at a serious SB contender, Tony shouldn't have even considered still playing.

The last anyone saw of Romo he drove the length of the field with a 134 QB rating. Didn't look done then.

Tony was broken. Good chance he couldn't last a season. But I took the question as playing Tony in 2016. Half a season. Already paid for. Tony still looking sharp. Play the man.
 
Aviano90

Aviano90

Go Seahawks!!!
Messages
16,758
Reaction score
24,485
pete026 said:
You do remember that it was an 81 yard drive that included the following:
24 yard run by McFadden.
29 yard pass interference call on Dez.
Def. Holding call to convert 3rd down
A dink and dunk pass 2 yards past the LOS that McFadden ran for 11 yards and 1st down.
3 yard TD pass lol.

I didn't really remember the drive but after all the crazy comments of late, I figured I would check it out. Wow, it was pretty amazing what it has been transformed into..... especially being the inconsequential game it was.
Click to expand...
It also included a highly inaccurate deep ball, something Dak was criticized for that year. Then it turned into an efficient “Dak and Dunk” type of drive, something Dak was criticized for that year.
 
Last edited:
darthseinfeld

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
32,011
Reaction score
36,449
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
J12B said:
The Dez catch.

NFC championship game would have been in Seattle. Which Dallas won there early in the season. Would have crushed them too if not for a 7 point block and 2 bone headed turnovers.

Definitely could have beat Seattle to go onto the superbowl.
Click to expand...
That play happened with 4 minutes left in the game. If that play had been a TD we give Aaron Rodgers the ball back with 4 minutes left needing a FG to win. We weren't winning that game
 
Irvin88_4life

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,445
Reaction score
26,294
America's Cowboy said:
Rewatch that 2016 playoff game. You'll notice how the officials made unnecessary calls ALL GAME LONG against the Dak-led Cowboys and how it not only killed 4-5 drives but also took away 2-3 potential TD opportunities.

Romo had 1 bad call called against him in the GB playoff game of 2014. Dak had 7+ bad calls called against his Offense. That's not including the several "non-calls" against our Defense during that game as well that helped Aaron Rodgers and the Packers.

It's not even a close comparison. Dak and his Cowboys BY FAR got bamboozled by the crooked officials in that GB playoff game in 2016 than Romo and his Cowboys did in their GB playoff game in 2014.

Also, Romo never threw for more than 2 TDs or even reached 300 yards passing in 6 playoff game attempts throughout his career. Dak easily accomplished both during his rookie playoff game. This pretty much should silence all of the "Romo would have performed better" during that 2016 playoff GB game.
Click to expand...
Plus Dak tied the game twice in the last few minutes of the 4th quarter
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,979
Reaction score
7,706
Rockport said:
Only idiots would think that. Romo couldn’t take a snap without getting hurt his last year.
Click to expand...
Well he took several snaps leading to a TD during a drive vs the Eagles without getting hurt so that makes your statement an outright lie.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,979
Reaction score
7,706
darthseinfeld said:
That play happened with 4 minutes left in the game. If that play had been a TD we give Aaron Rodgers the ball back with 4 minutes left needing a FG to win. We weren't winning that game
Click to expand...

The Cowboys defense in 2014 that was supposedly better than any defense that Prescott has had were unable to stop Rodgers on one leg during the second half.

Whilst you are likely right, with the points on the board it's a different scenario. It might have given the D a bit more juice to make a stop. They almost did but a tipped pass fell into the hands of a GB receiver rather than a Cowboys defender. If we had the lead then we might have been set up slightly differently and we make an interception. Who knows.

People comparing the Green Bay defense of 2014 and 2016 as being of a similar level...a week after overcoming the Cowboys in 2014 the Packers D had 4 Interceptions and 5 sacks on Russell Wilson in Seattle. They win the game but for horrific coaching by McCarthy during the second half and a couple of boneheaded plays late in the game. Compare that with guys off the street in the Packers' secondary in 2016 and after overcoming the Cowboys, the Packers D gave up 44 points vs the Falcons and it would have been over 50 if needed.
 
darthseinfeld

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
32,011
Reaction score
36,449
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Swagger said:
The Cowboys defense in 2014 that was supposedly better than any defense that Prescott has had were unable to stop Rodgers on one leg during the second half.

Whilst you are likely right, with the points on the board it's a different scenario. It might have given the D a bit more juice to make a stop. They almost did but a tipped pass fell into the hands of a GB receiver rather than a Cowboys defender.

People comparing the Green Bay defense of 2014 and 2016 as being of a similar level...a week after overcoming the Cowboys in 2014 the Packers D had 4 Interceptions and 5 sacks on Russell Wilson in Seattle. They win the game but for horrific coaching by McCarthy during the second half and a couple of boneheaded plays late in the game. Compare that with guys off the street in the Packers' secondary in 2016 and after overcoming the Cowboys, the Packers D gave up 44 points vs the Falcons and it would have been over 50 if needed.
Click to expand...
Ya that 2014 GB team was much better.

I just think Cowboys fans torture thems too much with that play. That play doesnt seal a win. Same with the famous Romo bobble. Even with that FG, Seattle would have had enough time to score. Both those games we ultimately would have needed the defense to win.

I don't know how much that should detract from the controversy or mishap that ended those games for us. But I do think that has to be remembered as well
 
jaythecowboy

jaythecowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,872
Reaction score
2,254
I don't think his body would have held up and in the meantime they would have been taking reps away from Dak.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,979
Reaction score
7,706
darthseinfeld said:
Ya that 2014 GB team was much better.

I just think Cowboys fans torture thems too much with that play. That play doesnt seal a win. Same with the famous Romo bobble. Even with that FG, Seattle would have had enough time to score. Both those games we ultimately would have needed the defense to win.

I don't know how much that should detract from the controversy or mishap that ended those games for us. But I do think that has to be remembered as well
Click to expand...

I largely agree re 2014 and the reality is that it was on Dez Bryant. I love me some Dez so I don't bang on about it but he knew the rules or should have known the rules at the time. He had control of the ball, he just needed to land normally in play to chew up some clock rather than focus on trying to score a TD! Yet people blame Romo for not throwing the ball to Beasley having slowed down the play to super slow mo and seen him open for a split second. Football doesn't work like that and when watched in real time the throw to Beasley just wasn't on. Romo would have had to loop the ball to him by which time Beasley would have got crushed by a defender. It's questionable if he even makes the first down and even more unlikely that he holds onto the ball. Yet some people blame Romo for Dez dropping the ball! Just shows how much people hate him.

I don't blame the zebras - the rule was the problem which has subsequently been changed and rightly so.

Blaming officials and decisions is a loser mentality. I remember the Lions blaming the play where the zebras picked up a flag in the 2014 play off game. They conveniently do not mention the countless incorrect decisions against the Cowboys in that game which were far more than against the Lions and officially documented after the game. Best team won on the day with a fantastic comeback. Loser mentality blaming officials.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top